Pakistan: The True Heir Of Indus Valley Civilization

[Friends of Baloch]

Everybody knows thats these disgusting pakis are born liars and suffering from mental disease that is their inherited Hindu "low-caste" inferiority complex.

At the end of the 19th century when the British conquered these dravidian punjabis they started to civilize and study them and have written much on the topic of India and its people. The British census records from just before the turn of the 20th century show that Punjab was less than 50% Muslim at the time and had among the highest concentrations of "harijans / dalits" (the 'untouchables') anywhere in the "Raj".

After a single British legal and education system for all were introduced to the "natives" without distinction against religion or "caste" there started to be mass conversions of Hindu low-castes in Punjab to Islam during the reign of the "Raj" so that they could escape from their pathetic existence at the bottom of Indian society they had been suffering for centuries.

These pakis have no roots in any Islamic civilizations. They are historically the "low caste" Hindus that were washing the feet and sweeping the toilets of the "Pandit jee" and later in their history become the servants and slaves of Muslim empires and finally collaborators with the "Britishers".

Dirty pakis have no unique history, culture or civilization of their own. No unique dynasties, economy, philosophy or arts to call their own. No unique identity, no identity at all. They share and borrow all things with India and are nothing but an arbitrary British invented state and fabricated "nationality".

In sum, these pakis are just the weakest and dirtiest of Indians.

[tripledouble]

Everybody knows thats these disgusting pakis are born liars and suffering from mental disease that is their inherited Hindu "low-caste" inferiority complex.

At the end of the 19th century when the British conquered these dravidian punjabis they started to civilize and study them and have written much on the topic of India and its people. The British census records from just before the turn of the 20th century show that Punjab was less than 50% Muslim at the time and had among the highest concentrations of "harijans / dalits" (the 'untouchables') anywhere in the "Raj".

Thank you for your insightful comment but you sir are a Black Dravidian Baloch, and the Baloch speak Brahui the only Dravidian language in Pakistan, so Balochistan is the homeland for dravidian people of Pakistan and balochistan is also home to Afro Makranis, so you sir shouldn't be a self-hater, there's nothing wrong with being a Black Baloch, be proud of your Dravidian heritage!

[Friends of Baloch]

the Baloch speak Brahui

The biggest Dravidian language in napakistan is actually Punjabi. Punjabi is the b*stardized language of raped Dravidians which you are a descendant of!

Punjabi language is distinct because it is the only language considered to now be largely "Indo-Aryan" that has retained its original Dravidian substratum and distinctly Dravidian tonal/nasal features.

Here is a perfect example pure dravidian paki punjabi:

PUNJABI BOLIYA - PTV SONG -PUNJABI FOLK SONG - BY BUSHRA SADIQ & GROUP - YouTube

Now what is the difference between these cackling dravdian pakis and their tamil brothers? Nothing! Both are bud bud sh*t sounding languages that sound exactly the same.

The only difference is that tamils are pure dravidians whereas punjabis are raped dravidians.

[tripledouble]

The biggest Dravidian language in napakistan is actually Punjabi. Punjabi is the b*stardized language of raped Dravidians which you are a descendant of!

Punjabi language is distinct because it is the only language considered to now be largely "Indo-Aryan" that has retained its original Dravidian substratum and distinctly Dravidian tonal/nasal features.

Here is a perfect example pure dravidian paki punjabi:

PUNJABI BOLIYA - PTV SONG -PUNJABI FOLK SONG - BY BUSHRA SADIQ & GROUP - YouTube

Now what is the difference between these cackling dravdian pakis and their tamil brothers? Nothing! Both are bud bud sh*t sounding languages that sound exactly the same.

The only difference is that tamils are pure dravidians whereas punjabis are raped dravidians.

I'll take your word my Black Baloch Dravidian brother, your people are true blue dravidians, be proud of your dravidian past!

[Toramana]

I'll take your word my Black Baloch Dravidian brother, your people are true blue dravidians, be proud of your dravidian past!

What is wrong with being Dravidians? They are very intelligent people. Pakis are not disliked for being Dravidians or otherwise but disliked for their proverbial dishonesty, ig-nobility, and moral corruptibility (not all Pakistanis, e.g., I consider you a gentleman. Only the super-patriots that are trying to invent a false history for themselves).

And pardon me, it is a fact that most of the Pakistanis east of Indus are the descendants of low-caste Hindus that converted to Islam to escape upper-caste oppression.

[Toramana]

Da Bannu Murdar is really the descendant of the people of the bygone Indus Valley Civilization. It is said when the noble Aryans attacked them, they were dispersed. Some might have ended up in Bannu.

[Da Bannu Mazdigar]

The kind of torakona are now declared kafir as per the constitution of Pakistan.

No wonder he left Pakistan after being abused by the local on ocassions.

[tripledouble]

What is wrong with being Dravidians? They are very intelligent people. Pakis are not disliked for being Dravidians or otherwise but disliked for their proverbial dishonesty, ig-nobility, and moral corruptibility (not all Pakistanis, e.g., I consider you a gentleman. Only the super-patriots that are trying to invent a false history for themselves).

And pardon me, it is a fact that most of the Pakistanis east of Indus are the descendants of low-caste Hindus that converted to Islam to escape upper-caste oppression.

That's not a fact wrora, you just proved your ignorance of South Asian history by saying south asian muslims descend from low caste hindus, which is partially true but the castes that make up Muslims of South Asia are very diverse, for example Allama Iqbal's and Nawaz Sharif's ancestors were brahmins(high caste) and Jinnah's ancestors were lohanas(middle castes), most of the Bohras and Memons descend from mercantile castes, that's why they're a business oriented community; most Punjabi Muslims descend from Jats who were not part of the caste system, and Rajputs who were warriors(Amir Khan the boxer is a Rajput) and then you have Chaudry's who are zamindars; as for Sindhis we all know that Sindhis mixed with balochis a lot even [MENTION=1058]Bengal_Tiger[/MENTION] could tell you about that, and about 30% of Muhajir Muslims have Pathan ancestry, but they obviously mixed a lot so they look like Indians now, and i'm not even scratching the surface of Turkish Muslims in South Asia like Pashas,Chugtais and Kidwais http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Turks_in_India

Most South Asian Muslims are converts from Hindus, but not all were low caste, the majority were of the middle castes like artisans and merchants and a few were high caste brahmins/khatris: Hamid Mir,Najam Sethi and Khawaja Saad are a good example of that.

Anyways i don't care about this because i'm a Hazarewal and we don't have a caste system nor do we associate with indians.

EDIT:Taking pride in the IVC doesn't mean we're manufacturing history, we're reclaiming the history of our land that spans 9000 years, the people of the IVC were brown too, so it's not like we're taking pride in some white aliens.

[Since1947]

Pakis are still Hindus, Islam has made no change to their hinduistic practises.

They're still comparing their skin tones, they still burn women with acid and do honor killings, they still use skin bleach, they still go to fortune tellers, they still worship democracy, they still play the cricket game of their colonial master...

Pakistan is not a muslim country.

Pakistan in an Hindu country that pretends to be Muslim.

Errrr and who or what exactly do you think you are? When did God give you the right to determine who is a Muslim and who is not? Yeah did not think so. :/

Things such as not being satisfied with skin tones, acid attacks, honour killings, 'worshipping' democracy etc happen in various countries around the world. Darn Hindu countries everywhere. These ''hinduistic practices'' are widespread so why the need to declare Pakistanis Hindus. Sigh.

Visiting this forum once in a while makes me realise common sense is not so common.

[Friends of Baloch]

What is wrong with being Dravidians? They are very intelligent people. Pakis are not disliked for being Dravidians or otherwise but disliked for their proverbial dishonesty, ig-nobility, and moral corruptibility (not all Pakistanis, e.g., I consider you a gentleman. Only the super-patriots that are trying to invent a false history for themselves).

And pardon me, it is a fact that most of the Pakistanis east of Indus are the descendants of low-caste Hindus that converted to Islam to escape upper-caste oppression.

Correct. Pakistanis are the true heirs of the Hindu "untouchables" replete with their inherent "low caste" racial inferiority complex that pakis are so well known for.

These pakis even after converting from "dalits" to Islam were still treated like "untoucbables" by the Hindus until the "Britishers" partitioned India.

See from 7:40 to 9:20 below:

Partition of India Origin of Hatred BBC History India & Pakistan Documentary sa prevodom - YouTube

The "Britishers" partitioning of India resulted in the biggest case of "Black-on-Black" crime and violence that the World has ever seen, most of this barbaric savagery taking place in the Bundjab (aka the raped ass of India).

Indian society and civilization is so inward looking and backwards in some ways that it deeply sticks to its "caste system" so much that even when a native of theirs converts outside of it to a foreign religion the rest of Hindu society ignores and doesnt acknowledge this and still treats the "converted" by whatever "caste" they originally belonged to. That is why Muslims and Christians are so discriminated against in India because they have mostly converted out of the "low castes" which their Hindu brethren never fully recognized.

But now that these ex-Hindu "low caste" pakis have for the first time in their miserable history been given a country of their own they are desperate to deny this fact about their pathetic history so have tried to falsely reinvent themselves as the ruler rather than the servant and slave and as the descendants of any number of invaders that had in reality conquered, raped and looted their weak and pathetic ancestors in centuries past.

The most "popular" paki lies and fantasies are claiming descent from the following races that their families and ancestors in reality have nothing to do with:

Mughals
Persians
Arabs
Turks / "Central Asians"
Scythians
Afghans
Huns
Greeks

Even the retarded official website of the government of the Bundjab peddles these lies to try and compensate for their racial and "low caste" inferiroty complex!

"although originally belonging to the Aryan stock, the people of Punjab are descendants of the Iranians, Turks, Afghans and Arabs who came individually or in groups." - http://www.punjab.gov.pk/about_punjab_people -

Bascially trying to claim anything and everything that these retarded Indians turned pakis are not!

Poor, ugly, crapply little pakis and their sad little fantasies and "low caste" racial inferiority complex.

Desperate to be Persian or Arab but they are just sad, dirty little pakis.

[tripledouble]

Correct. Pakistanis are the true heirs of the Hindu "untouchables" replete with their inherent "low caste" racial inferiority complex that pakis are so well known for.

These pakis even after converting from "dalits" to Islam were still treated like "untoucbables" by the Hindus until the "Britishers" partitioned India.

See from 7:40 to 9:20 below:

Partition of India Origin of Hatred BBC History India & Pakistan Documentary sa prevodom - YouTube

The "Britishers" partitioning of India resulted in the biggest case of "Black-on-Black" crime and violence that the World has ever seen, most of this barbaric savagery taking place in the Bundjab (aka the raped ass of India).

It's hillarious how you're riled up about proving that Punjabis are Dravidians when you yourself are Balochi Dravidian, your people are Dravidians and speak Brahui, don't need to whitewash them by sharing pictures of White Sardars who are part of the elite Baloch and mistreat the average Baloch, who happen to be convertes;The Baloch Sardars have foreign origins but the average Baloch like around 80% are of local stock and look like Sindhis and Makranis, only some have are mixed with Pashtuns and look like them; if you visit my hometown of Abbotabad and ask them about Baloch people, they think of people like this






Not the White Sardars who are a minority and they brainwash poor Baloch by telling them they're actually Kurds Even the Iranians call Baloch people Hindis

Be proud to be Brown man, there's nothing wrong with being Dravidian, even in Abbotabad us Hindkowans take pride in the Harrapa civilisation, we don't claim to be Kurds or Arab we have people of all colors, nothing wrong with that.