shocking hadith, hadith with no sense, hadith cannot be believed by a sane person

[Badlun]

No, He is a Khattak, if I recall correctly. As a matter of fact, I am 99.99 percent sure he is a Khattak.

What does it serve of he is Khattak or not. What matters is to refute his ideas. He may be Khattak or Bangash or Somalian.

I am astonished that why we do not simply admit that some Hadith are not authentic instead of proving that monkeys can throw stones and punish their fellow monkeys. I cant understand how such absurd hadith can be present in books like Bukhari!

[Manzareh]

What does it serve of he is Khattak or not. What matters is to refute his ideas. He may be Khattak or Bangash or Somalian.

I am astonished that why we do not simply admit that some Hadith are not authentic instead of proving that monkeys can throw stones and punish their fellow monkeys. I cant understand how such absurd hadith can be present in books like Bukhari!

He asks a question, gets a reply and then asks the same question again. Clearly a troll.

FYI Barakzai gave a response to the monkey topic on page 5, seems you have selective reading issues like dreamer does.

[Admin Khan]

What does it serve of he is Khattak or not. What matters is to refute his ideas. He may be Khattak or Bangash or Somalian.

I am astonished that why we do not simply admit that some Hadith are not authentic instead of proving that monkeys can throw stones and punish their fellow monkeys. I cant understand how such absurd hadith can be present in books like Bukhari!

Maybe they were never supposed to be there to begin with, and perhaps the enemies of Islam included them. Maybe those terms have original meanings, that have been lost, and mean something else. I am beyond confident that if I were to meet Manzareh, and say obvious English words, that he might think mean obvious things, but in NY they mean something else. Languages change, that could be another reason.