Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Saudis to destroy prophet's tomb?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Saudis to destroy prophet's tomb?

    I dont know if this is true or not, there are many news reports saying this:




    I hope not
    Last edited by Karachi; 11-01-2012, 09:58 AM.

  • #2
    If it is true then the Saudi govt is gone and a new uprising of the Muslims world is ahead. These Saudi kings are mad. They will be dumped in their dollars.
    Muslims respect them but it does not mean they do whatever they like. There is nothing more respectable to Muslims than Muhammad peace be upon him and anything related to him. This will be the highest level of ignorance if they ever tried to even think about this idea. It will shake the world, it will change the world.
    Last edited by Friend; 11-01-2012, 10:17 AM.

    Comment


    • #3
      Dont worry, remember what happened to Africa's King of Kings, dishevelled, ragged and broken, bloodied nose, and the ignominiously shot . . . . Its matter of time.

      Plutarch came with this idea that is now a poem:

      Though the mills of God grind slowly;
      Yet they grind exceeding small;
      Though with patience he stands waiting,
      With exactness grinds he all.

      Comment


      • #4
        I doubt this report is true. Nobody could be so idiotic.

        Comment


        • #5
          I don't think they will be destroying the original tomb .. the builiding above it .. may be .. just to expand it and allow more people to come there.
          yao warokay ghwandi baagh ao pa khwa ye seen rawan!

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by asad71 View Post
            I doubt this report is true. Nobody could be so idiotic.
            Similarly how one could have never thought the hub of Islam, Saudi, can ally with Israel to bang another Muslim country. Remember Asad, people forget religion when it comes time for some dirty politics, or making a few quick Bejamins, tsk, tsk.
            Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

            A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

            For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


            The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

            -Ferishta, 1560–1620

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
              Similarly how one could have never thought the hub of Islam, Saudi, can ally with Israel to bang another Muslim country. Remember Asad, people forget religion when it comes time for some dirty politics, or making a few quick Bejamins, tsk, tsk.
              Saudi is not hub of Islam ,nice try though.
              people might forget that why should we forget ?
              doesnt that make us as bad?

              dont forget the very planes,tanks and other vehicles which are used in Afghanistan are refueled by the same Saudis.
              Last edited by ډګروال; 11-01-2012, 06:11 PM.

              Comment


              • #8
                ^ makkah and medina are not hub of Islam?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                  ^ makkah and medina are not hub of Islam?
                  Jab insaan jahil hota gain, he might at times might think Amsterdam and Rotterdam are, not Mecca and Medina.
                  Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.

                  A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai

                  For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."


                  The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!

                  -Ferishta, 1560–1620

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by Admin Khan View Post
                    Jab insaan jahil hota gain, he might at times might think Amsterdam and Rotterdam are, not Mecca and Medina.
                    insaan jab jahil hotha hai to woo baath karney ke tameez bol jatha hai,tere jaisy.
                    you said house of saud(Saudi the monarchy) is hub of islam ,which is totally nonsense.now you are saying mecca and madina and if you think they are the same than you need some education.

                    funny how you start yapping in urdu because you have another seculer tool speaking your language.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                      ^ makkah and medina are not hub of Islam?
                      makka and madina are not house of saud ,you failed.

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        ^ are you seriously that blind and stupid? house of saud are ruling the place, they are destroying or doing whatever they want to the place.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                          ^ are you seriously that blind and stupid? house of saud are ruling the place, they are destroying or doing whatever they want to the place.
                          wrong

                          the puppet king isnt the owner of those places but a custodian.
                          so they are what we call chaprasee or toilet cleaners of Majid ul haram and majid ul nabawi.even than their position is illegitimate.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            ^ a chaprasee doesn't destroy or makes whatever he wants at the place. you are completely wrong

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                              ^ a chaprasee doesn't destroy or makes whatever he wants at the place. you are completely wrong
                              Whats your point?

                              Once again; what do you want done?

                              As I stated elsewhere you identify the symptoms of the disease and dont treat the underlying cause.

                              Who backs them? Who covers their asses in the media complex whenever they suppress legitimate debate, even nonviolent, in their home country?

                              http://www.aljazeera.com/indepth/opi...543685680.html

                              Who protected them in Gulf War 1 against internal turmoil?

                              Who has a Carter Era declaration of immediate engagement if the house of Saud is threatened?

                              Also, your commentary about being blind to Africa is utterly uninformed. Tell me again, who decided to intervene in Africa on multiple military engagements leading to a deluge of arms falling into the hands of tauregs and then being transferred to these other characters?

                              Who backs leaders like Zardari of Pakistan and pretty much every other political party there to allow the various kingdoms military installations in regions close to Iran?

                              You guys whine and complain about the situation in Saudi and who controls the Saudi intelligence, but then also whine when internal folks deal with the issue in their own ways because they are also too "wahabi."

                              What do you want, Clark Kent to come out of the sky and remove them?

                              When their interests were threatened in Bahrain who extinguished all media coverage of the Bahrain Saudi let intervention.

                              Internally, that Al jazeera article shows, they disappear their own people... your own article shows that archaelogy professors in the Kingdom are reeling from the excesses but cannot do a damn thing.

                              Also you are completely off in the third world issues involving the Saudis and why their protocols dont work in Europe or America. Why is that they find fertile ground in all the areas you mention? Are these regions not in a status or perpetual interventionalism with a nothing to lose attitude? Whether it is Sudan, Taureg regions, Bahrain post the British protecterate, Iraqi Sunni areas, Pakistan and Afghanistan, Chechnya, Bosnia: All these regions have one thing in common. I will let you think about what it is.
                              "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X