Are all followers of the sect Mutazilah considered disbelievers

[RevolutionThroughReason]

how is classifying 2010, a child molestor, got anything to do with reason, a logical debate and mu'tazillism?
mu'tazillah still adhere to qu'ran and hadiths. doing good deeds and uniting muslims.
read up on mu'tazillah and try to learn what they are really about.

We have to separate ourselves from those who are a threat to our youth. 2010's Alma-mater is basically a nursery for sodomy which takes advantage of poor, disadvantaged children and exploits them for the deviance of his elders. 2010 himself was a victim of this cycle and now he perpetuates it.

Logic is not detracted by name calling, it's truth value that counts in logic, everything else is a secondary matter.

[کیش]

Mutazilah: a sect that preaches the right interpretation and claim to have equable knowledge of god. Than go online and try (notice to try) to get a fling with Indian girls.

Very interesting.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Mu'tazilah just use the reality that God is supposed to be responsible for creating and using that to understand the Qur'an.

so if Mu'tazilah are responsible trying to claim they have God's knowledge, we did God make Nature the way these people interpret it?

The fact someone flirts with Women has no bearing on how true their beliefs are, Especially considering Deobandis, Taliban are known for sexually abusing and molesting young boys

[RevolutionThroughReason]

i don't necessarily disagree with some of the mutazillah ideas but rtr's approach is defective. if he was truly enlightened by his logic and reason, he would be a guiding light, not the way he is, degrading every conversation with his own emotional and intellectual imbalance and inner frustrations.

If what you were saying were correct, that means The Truth value of something depends on whether or not you insult, act hostile or aggressive towards others in the process?

So by that understanding, gravity is only real if the person saying it is being nice to you, electriicity only works if the person saying it didn't insult you first. Platetectonics is only valid because the presenter is being polite. Clearly that would be ridiculous because these things work regardless of how nice you were to someone about it. Which leads to this conclusion: ENLIGHTENMENT has NOTHING to do with how you argue with people.

If politeness concerns you more than Truth; then you are far from ever even knowing what enlightenment actually is.

Maybe you should work more on Truth Values than being brainwashed by idiotic Aboriginal garble and coming to the rescue or Low Life ...but very polite jack asses like Arevapast. Even George Bush was polite and we saw what a polite ****stain he was. I guess you're treading his foot steps?

[کیش]

Mu'tazilah just use the reality that God is supposed to be responsible for creating and using that to understand the Qur'an.

so if Mu'tazilah are responsible trying to claim they have God's knowledge, we did God make Nature the way these people interpret it?

The fact someone flirts with Women has no bearing on how true their beliefs are, Especially considering Deobandis, Taliban are known for sexually abusing and molesting young boys

Explain the first two paragraph alittle more clearer please.

The third paragraph is an example of a hypocrit. A preacher at one time, than trying to hit on multiple women on another. You do know fornication is punishable by lashes? Or is that ambiguous.

Also, i don't know why or care about your obsession with the Taliban and false lies. Don't change the topic, we aren't talking about the Taliban.

[faye]

We have to separate ourselves from those who are a threat to our youth. 2010's Alma-mater is basically a nursery for sodomy which takes advantage of poor, disadvantaged children and exploits them for the deviance of his elders. 2010 himself was a victim of this cycle and now he perpetuates it.

Logic is not detracted by name calling, it's truth value that counts in logic, everything else is a secondary matter.

poor excuse. get over yourself.

so what is the truth value of the accusation that 2010 is a victim of paedophiles, and is perpetuating it or is that just another one of your fantasies?
are you sure YOU are not the one who has been interfered with, as your overt homophobia and accusations, point you out as being the most disturbed person here.
new studies show 'homophobes hiding in the closet'.

[faye]

Maybe you should work more on Truth Values than being brainwashed by idiotic Aboriginal garble and coming to the rescue or Low Life ...but very polite jack asses like Arevapast. Even George Bush was polite and we saw what a polite ****stain he was. I guess you're treading his foot steps?

logically, one would not need to be so abusive if one was balanced in themselves, emotionally and intellectually. you are obviously out of balance.
as well as your imbalance being obvious to one and all, we are also well aware of your obsession with the anal orifice, gays and crossdressers, already.
must you continue to advertise it?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Also, i don't know why or care about your obsession with the Taliban and false lies. Don't change the topic, we aren't talking about the Taliban.

you would know that better than anyone else here. right?

I am a chameleon. I could say I'm an Arab, Turk, Irani, Afghan, Indian, and Hispanic.

But I try to tell white girls am Italian, but it doesn't work damn racist skirts.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

logically, one would not need to be so abusive if one was balanced in themselves, emotionally and intellectually. you are obviously out of balance.
as well as your imbalance being obvious to one and all, we are also well aware of your obsession with the anal orifice, gays and crossdressers, already.
must you continue to advertise it?

That's not true; because #1 you assume it's a need #2 it still presumes that how truth your arguments are depend on how polite you are

you're regurgitating the same bull**** you said before; circular argument fallacy.

you have no ground to stand on here Faye

[RevolutionThroughReason]

poor excuse. get over yourself.

so what is the truth value of the accusation that 2010 is a victim of paedophiles, and is perpetuating it or is that just another one of your fantasies?
are you sure YOU are not the one who has been interfered with, as your overt homophobia and accusations, point you out as being the most disturbed person here.
new studies show 'homophobes hiding in the closet'.

Because the school he studied at is known for sexual abuse of children

perhaps in Australia fantasizing about sexual abuse of kids is a norm; which explains why you'd think that is something to fantasize about; but that doesn't work for us.

"New Studies" Another idiotic emotional black mail tactic you pulled out of your aging decrepit ass

[faye]

you're regurgitating the same bull**** you said before; circular argument fallacy.
you have no ground to stand on here Faye

OOPPPS!! anal again

of course i have no ground to stand on. it doesn't exist, remember?

[faye]

Because the school he studied at is known for sexual abuse of children.
"New Studies" Another idiotic emotional black mail tactic you pulled out of your aging decrepit ass

oh..the school he studied at is known for paedophilia. so the stats show that every single child suffered from this abuse, including 2010?

OOOPPPSSSS!!!!! anal AGAIN.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

oh..the school he studied at is known for paedophilia. so the stats show that every single child suffered from this abuse, including 2010?

OOOPPPSSSS!!!!! anal AGAIN.

well if he's in an environment that fosters it, and he's defending it, logically this would be the case.

[faye]

i see, logically but not factually.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

well logic is derived from facts