As we know, in Islam it is allowed for a man to have physical relations with slave women. Such women can be acquired in two ways according to Islamic Sharia; (1) daughters, sisters, wives, mother of the fallen enemy can be captured and made slave (2) such women can be bought/purchased e.g. individually or from a slave market.
Such women are called "right-hand possession" or "property". Not only the immediate owner or master has a right (of "physical relation" to use a decent word for an abhorrent act) over her but also his father and grand-father.
What would be your reaction if for example today your father, brother, son or husband buys a slave woman and keeps her for sensual purposes? There are many parts of the world where there is extreme poverty and from where women can be bought.
Personally, I find it extremely detestable. Belonging to Al-Ghamidi School of thought (and a pantheist/mystic) , I think such acts/rules should immediately be revoked/forbidden and replaced with universal human rights.
Such women are called "right-hand possession" or "property". Not only the immediate owner or master has a right (of "physical relation" to use a decent word for an abhorrent act) over her but also his father and grand-father.
What would be your reaction if for example today your father, brother, son or husband buys a slave woman and keeps her for sensual purposes? There are many parts of the world where there is extreme poverty and from where women can be bought.
Personally, I find it extremely detestable. Belonging to Al-Ghamidi School of thought (and a pantheist/mystic) , I think such acts/rules should immediately be revoked/forbidden and replaced with universal human rights.


Comment