Tweet
Here is my premise.
Allah creates what He wills, without any limitations on his powers.
Thus if he chooses to create a human being, there are no constraints for him that need to follow preset universal laws of nature.
So let us not argue if evolution is true or not, but suppose that it is true and that it is a universal law of nature according to the sciences. Meaning, let's not argue on the scientific validity of this theory, but rather delve on the "meaning" it gives to life, and the constraints it puts on the Creator.
Those who believe in evolution are rejecting Allah's attributes as Khaliq and Qadir.
For if it is true that life spontaneously emerged, species evolved from one another, then we have reverted to paganism. Read all the mythologies of the polytheistic religions, and they too describe a form of "evolution" and speciation where the gods take different forms. To believe that some power other than Allah imposes limitations on his ability to create from nothingness, to give life to non living things, such as clay, is truly the hallmark of a disbeliever.
Scimitar, sun, goat, roshina and co. You say you are muslims, but you believe in evolution - this belief weakens your Iman. Science cannot trump religion. Many generations before you believed that science had trumped religion before. The materialists were one such people who believed that all life is what is observable. What cannot be observed cannot be real. Thus god and ghosts were not real because they are not observable. Indeed, when arguing with mountain goat, he said this many times over. This is what materialism entails and this has been the arguments of those who rejected the belief in Resurrection, the afterlife, the angels and Allah. Which is why the most vocal proponents of evolution happen to also be the most vehement of anti-theists, like richard dawkins. Granted that there are theists who use the theory of evolution. I am one such person. But I do not believe in it. I don't believe in speciation - one organism forming into another organism. Rather, Allah creates what He wills. How? This is not in the domain of science. And you are not the first to entertain the idea that you know the secret to life. You are not Dr. Frankenstein, so don't fool your self into thinking that you know how Allah created. Just like you don't know why Allah says he has a wahj or yad. Sama3na wa Ata3na. If Allah says he created Adam from mud, then this is the truth. Mud is not bacteria. If Allah says he rafa3a Essa ibn maryam (alihi salam), then it literally means he "raised" him, consequently if Allah says he "anzalahu" in regards to Adam (alihi Salam), then this is true. Like wise, if Allah says that Muhammad made the journey through the seven heavens and met the prophets during mi3raj, then this is a literal truth!
Any objections?
Allah creates what He wills, without any limitations on his powers.
Thus if he chooses to create a human being, there are no constraints for him that need to follow preset universal laws of nature.
So let us not argue if evolution is true or not, but suppose that it is true and that it is a universal law of nature according to the sciences. Meaning, let's not argue on the scientific validity of this theory, but rather delve on the "meaning" it gives to life, and the constraints it puts on the Creator.
Those who believe in evolution are rejecting Allah's attributes as Khaliq and Qadir.
For if it is true that life spontaneously emerged, species evolved from one another, then we have reverted to paganism. Read all the mythologies of the polytheistic religions, and they too describe a form of "evolution" and speciation where the gods take different forms. To believe that some power other than Allah imposes limitations on his ability to create from nothingness, to give life to non living things, such as clay, is truly the hallmark of a disbeliever.
Scimitar, sun, goat, roshina and co. You say you are muslims, but you believe in evolution - this belief weakens your Iman. Science cannot trump religion. Many generations before you believed that science had trumped religion before. The materialists were one such people who believed that all life is what is observable. What cannot be observed cannot be real. Thus god and ghosts were not real because they are not observable. Indeed, when arguing with mountain goat, he said this many times over. This is what materialism entails and this has been the arguments of those who rejected the belief in Resurrection, the afterlife, the angels and Allah. Which is why the most vocal proponents of evolution happen to also be the most vehement of anti-theists, like richard dawkins. Granted that there are theists who use the theory of evolution. I am one such person. But I do not believe in it. I don't believe in speciation - one organism forming into another organism. Rather, Allah creates what He wills. How? This is not in the domain of science. And you are not the first to entertain the idea that you know the secret to life. You are not Dr. Frankenstein, so don't fool your self into thinking that you know how Allah created. Just like you don't know why Allah says he has a wahj or yad. Sama3na wa Ata3na. If Allah says he created Adam from mud, then this is the truth. Mud is not bacteria. If Allah says he rafa3a Essa ibn maryam (alihi salam), then it literally means he "raised" him, consequently if Allah says he "anzalahu" in regards to Adam (alihi Salam), then this is true. Like wise, if Allah says that Muhammad made the journey through the seven heavens and met the prophets during mi3raj, then this is a literal truth!
Any objections?
get a grip, lad
Comment