Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Pashtuns as Iranian people?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    Originally posted by Kakar-Wardak View Post
    All indic groups have caste system, pashtuns have tribal system This is alien to your ganga Civillization.
    India's diversity is extreme. North, South, East, West. Pashtuns could just be another Indic race, on the outskirts of Indosphere.

    No other country can match India's diversity, some example in geography:

    From this:



    To this:

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by Toramana View Post
      Proud to be Paracha a sophisticated people . Now go to mountains and return to the Pashtun profession of being highwaymean.

      There is nothing sophisticated about parachas.
      Hardly anyone considers you or you sophisticated talents.
      You must be on crack to think Pashtuns are highway men.

      Comment


      • #48
        Originally posted by Akbar View Post
        Afghans and specifically Pashtuns.
        Ah ok, so we are all Khorasanion according to the hadiths.
        Imagine Balochs, Pashtuns and Tajiks under one banner and following the same aim. We could conquer the universum.
        Last edited by Elias; 11-27-2017, 01:05 PM.

        Comment


        • #49
          Honestly, who gives two hoots about this iranic mumbo-jumbo?
          We are what we are: Pahstuns. Despite cultural and historical differences, we consider tajiks and balochis(along with nuristanis and probably also dardics) as our brothers, and to some extent, even punjabis.

          Comment


          • #50
            Originally posted by Ambatin View Post
            Pashtun culture is closer to Indians than to Iranian plateu people. its time you embrace your inner Indian. Lol

            welcome to the Indian umbrella, brothers.
            Lol you wished you could be like your conquerors.
            Can it be possible that you have Stockholm syndrom?

            Comment


            • #51
              Originally posted by Elias View Post
              Ah ok, so we are all Khorasanion according to the hadiths.
              Imagine Balochs, Pashtuns and Tajiks under one banner and following the same aim. We could conquer the universum.
              That's very true
              We have too much in common.

              Comment


              • #52
                Originally posted by Ambatin View Post
                Pashtun culture is closer to Indians than to Iranian plateu people. its time you embrace your inner Indian. Lol

                welcome to the Indian umbrella, brothers.
                Every Indic person wishes this was true ...so they can go around saying "We waz Pathanz"

                lol

                Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                don’t try to be smart.

                Comment


                • #53
                  Originally posted by Toramana View Post
                  Proud to be Paracha a sophisticated people . Now go to mountains and return to the Pashtun profession of being highwaymean.

                  You went from Pashtun Nationalist to stereotyping Pashtuns ....What the actual F**k lol

                  Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                  Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                  don’t try to be smart.

                  Comment


                  • #54
                    Originally posted by Toramana View Post
                    Proud to be Paracha a sophisticated people . Now go to mountains and return to the Pashtun profession of being highwaymean.

                    Hahahahaha Parachgaan sophisticated?

                    Pa araam kena. Che Parachgaano qisse uleekam dalle, no de sharma no bo bekhee internet predey.

                    Pa shoomtob ke taso sani nashta da manama.

                    Comment


                    • #55
                      The theory states that a some millennia ago, there was a group of people, Aryan(Iranian in English). They multiplied into lots of groups and separated over large distances forming their own empires(and their language evolving into different languages). Two such separated groups are 'Persians' and 'Pashtuns'.
                      This theory does not say that 'Persian Culture' = 'Pashtun Culture'. It just says that both of the groups had a common ancestor a long time ago.
                      Make's sense doesn't it?

                      P.S. I would put Pashto Language older than Persian Language(in terms of closeness to the ancient Aryani language).

                      Comment


                      • #56
                        Originally posted by khushal View Post
                        Khorasan just means east or where the sun rises similar to what "Orient: Oriental" means. The Persians referred to what was East of them as Khorasan.
                        Thats partially true, dude. Yeah Khorasan means "where the sun rises" just like "Maghreb" means "where the sun dies" but it has also a cultural and historical meaning. It was the way Persians called to the Eastern Iranian provinces. India is not Khorasan.

                        Pashtuns from the tribal areas are not Khorasanis. Herat, Balkh, Samarqand, Bukhara, Merv, Panjkent, Tus, Neyshabur, are considered as Khorasan. Sometimes even Kabul and Ghazni were included but Kandahar and Jalalabad are not Khorasan. I find hilarious how Pashtun nationalist and Pashtun pro-Talibans are trying so hard to relate themselves to this term, but its just cultural appropiation.

                        BTW Tajiks also claim that Khorasan only belongs to them which is also BS. A Pashtun guy was the last king of Khorasan (Abdullah DUrrani) and several Persianized Turkic tribes ruled this land for almost a millenia.

                        Nationalism is s tupid lol
                        "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
                        I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

                        -Ferdowsi.

                        Comment


                        • #57
                          Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                          You went from Pashtun Nationalist to stereotyping Pashtuns ....What the actual F**k lol
                          Lol-the man who claims to be the field prize winner in maths but does not know how to prove fundamental theorems of calculus. Pathetic.

                          Comment


                          • #58
                            Guys Pashruns are East Iranic a shade of the diverse grouping . So why you guys argue?

                            Comment


                            • #59
                              Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
                              Thats partially true, dude. Yeah Khorasan means "where the sun rises" just like "Maghreb" means "where the sun dies" but it has also a cultural and historical meaning. It was the way Persians called to the Eastern Iranian provinces. India is not Khorasan.

                              Pashtuns from the tribal areas are not Khorasanis. Herat, Balkh, Samarqand, Bukhara, Merv, Panjkent, Tus, Neyshabur, are considered as Khorasan. Sometimes even Kabul and Ghazni were included but Kandahar and Jalalabad are not Khorasan. I find hilarious how Pashtun nationalist and Pashtun pro-Talibans are trying so hard to relate themselves to this term, but its just cultural appropiation.

                              BTW Tajiks also claim that Khorasan only belongs to them which is also BS. A Pashtun guy was the last king of Khorasan (Abdullah DUrrani) and several Persianized Turkic tribes ruled this land for almost a millenia.

                              Nationalism is s tupid lol
                              The country of Pashtuns has never been referred to as Khurasan in medieval sources. Even early Durrani sources mention Afghanistan (Pakhtunkhwa) and Khurasan as distinct geographical entities.

                              Comment


                              • #60
                                Originally posted by Toramana View Post
                                Lol-the man who claims to be the field prize winner in maths but does not know how to prove fundamental theorems of calculus. Pathetic.
                                Is this your deflection tactic parachi bibi?

                                Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                                Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                                don’t try to be smart.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X