Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

is there a divide between Pakistani and Afghan Pashtuns?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by Golden View Post
    They think taliban are arabs, they saw taliban on TV and confused sikhs for them. Every muzlim is arab for them. Clearly they can't distinguish between one and other. But I'm sure they could differentiate between sikhs and eastern europeans, caucasians Lol
    Yeah white people can't tell the difference... go figure! The most racist people on earth are gonna look at a guy with a turban and go huh, he must be from Amritsar.

    Comment


    • Originally posted by Porus View Post
      What's your point though dude? Pathans are Pakistani nationals, they live amongst the rest of us. Of course they're mixed.

      What's your overall point here?
      he's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.

      Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


      Originally posted by ذو الفقار
      don’t try to be smart.

      Comment


      • Originally posted by Golden View Post
        Purity of afghans most be preserved at all costs as per wishes of Afghanfootball. This is why Pakistan need to deport refugees back as soon as possible before they become pathans.
        Yes, Loy Afghanistan is important for the preservation of pure Afghan genes.

        Seriously though, you are very stupid.

        Comment


        • Originally posted by Golden View Post
          They think taliban are arabs,
          That's all you had to say.

          Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


          Originally posted by ذو الفقار
          don’t try to be smart.

          Comment


          • Originally posted by Porus View Post
            Yes, Loy Afghanistan is important for the preservation of pure Afghan genes.

            Seriously though, you are very stupid.
            His math skills .....like what? lol

            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
            don’t try to be smart.

            Comment


            • Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
              he's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.
              I don't really care about height and I'm not gonna do research on it either, though on a general level I think height doesn't fluctuate that much from Punjab to Pashtunkhwa. Body types are different. Punjabis eat food with a lot of ghee and yoghurt, so they're a bit fatter. Pashtuns are broader built with big hands.

              Height, eh... if it differs. I don't know, maybe. Could be.

              Regardless we will all fall short in front of the Belgians. Those oversized abominations of their Neanderthal ancestors.

              But then that's cool. That's all good. Because then we'll show them this dude:



              The Poonjabi nightmare. With a chop of his hand taking approximately 5 hours and 36 minutes to reach your skull, this guy is a force NOT to be reckoned with.

              Comment


              • Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                [MENTION=19516]Rooh[/MENTION]

                I for one don't think Afghans look Nordic, Aryana is citing an out-dated claim by Carleton Coon, that's like over 80 years old


                I'd post pictures of myself but I'm afraid you're just trying to bait everyone here to share their pictures so you can wack off to them.....gross
                Of course Afghans don't look Nordic. If you read what I said idiot, you would know that I just mentioned facial structure, and to some extent height.
                "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

                Comment


                • Originally posted by Porus View Post
                  Yeah white people can't tell the difference... go figure! The most racist people on earth are gonna look at a guy with a turban and go huh, he must be from Amritsar.
                  They sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by Porus View Post
                    I don't really care about height
                    It wasn't about the height, he was trying to calculate genetic differences between Indian markers among "Pathans" and Pashtuns, he's claiming there's a 40% difference, but it's arithmetically incorrect.

                    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                    don’t try to be smart.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by Golden View Post
                      They sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.
                      What was I wrong about exactly? I never claimed they were identical.

                      Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                      Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                      don’t try to be smart.

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                        It wasn't about the height, he was trying to calculate genetic differences between Indian markers among "Pathans" and Pashtuns, he's claiming there's a 40% difference, but it's arithmetically incorrect.
                        I know, I was referring to the battle that midway took place b/w Aryana and Golden.

                        Pathans are Pathans. They will always be Pathans.

                        Punjabis will always be Punjabis.

                        One groups likes to fire bullets in the air and receive them headfirst while dancing in a wedding. The other likes to oil themselves up with ghee and 'fight' each other in the mud. And then we get offended when they say Indians are brown and dirty.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                          he's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.
                          Wait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lol

                          15 and 23 are fixed scores of two individuals. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much more or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmao

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by Golden View Post
                            They sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.
                            That's not what you were saying though. You're making it out to be that if a white dude can't tell a Pathan and Punjabi apart, then we can't either.

                            Me, or any other member in my family can tell a typical Pathan apart. They have a peculiar smile, wrinkles on their face and olive skin... usually with brown hair. Sets them straight apart.

                            This doesn't mean people can't be racially ambiguous, but vast majority of Punjabis and Pathans look different. This is undebatable. We're TWO different groups ffs

                            Comment


                            • Originally posted by Golden View Post
                              Wait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lol

                              15 and 23 are fixed scores. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmao
                              If you're saying you're only counting Indian marker scores between the two groups. This sums to 38% total. Otherwise what would your denominator be if you rule out all other scores Anyways, so if we take percent difference .23-.15- .,08 , then using your reasoning .08/.38= .21 = 21%. Either way you'd have done your Math wrong, even though even this assumption would be incorrect.

                              What you've demonstrated here is that you can't do Math

                              Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                              Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                              don’t try to be smart.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Golden View Post
                                Wait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lol

                                15 and 23 are fixed scores of two individuals. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much more or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmao
                                Originally posted by Golden View Post
                                If only you payed little more attention in school.

                                Afghan pashtuns average 15%, pathans average 23%. If one is 15% Indian and other 23%, clearly one of them is 35% less Indian then the other here. Another way way of saying is pathans score little over 1/3 indian compared to afghan pashtuns.

                                math, how does it work?
                                No please... how DOES it work Sohniya?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X