Originally posted by Golden
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
is there a divide between Pakistani and Afghan Pashtuns?
Collapse
X
-
he's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.Originally posted by Porus View PostWhat's your point though dude? Pathans are Pakistani nationals, they live amongst the rest of us. Of course they're mixed.
What's your overall point here?
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Yes, Loy Afghanistan is important for the preservation of pure Afghan genes.Originally posted by Golden View PostPurity of afghans most be preserved at all costs as per wishes of Afghanfootball. This is why Pakistan need to deport refugees back as soon as possible before they become pathans.
Seriously though, you are very stupid.
Comment
-
That's all you had to say.Originally posted by Golden View PostThey think taliban are arabs,
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
His math skills .....like what? lolOriginally posted by Porus View PostYes, Loy Afghanistan is important for the preservation of pure Afghan genes.
Seriously though, you are very stupid.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
I don't really care about height and I'm not gonna do research on it either, though on a general level I think height doesn't fluctuate that much from Punjab to Pashtunkhwa. Body types are different. Punjabis eat food with a lot of ghee and yoghurt, so they're a bit fatter. Pashtuns are broader built with big hands.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Posthe's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.
Height, eh... if it differs. I don't know, maybe. Could be.
Regardless we will all fall short in front of the Belgians. Those oversized abominations of their Neanderthal ancestors.
But then that's cool. That's all good. Because then we'll show them this dude:

The Poonjabi nightmare. With a chop of his hand taking approximately 5 hours and 36 minutes to reach your skull, this guy is a force NOT to be reckoned with.
Comment
-
Of course Afghans don't look Nordic. If you read what I said idiot, you would know that I just mentioned facial structure, and to some extent height.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post[MENTION=19516]Rooh[/MENTION]
I for one don't think Afghans look Nordic, Aryana is citing an out-dated claim by Carleton Coon, that's like over 80 years old
I'd post pictures of myself but I'm afraid you're just trying to bait everyone here to share their pictures so you can wack off to them.....gross"If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"
Comment
-
They sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.Originally posted by Porus View PostYeah white people can't tell the difference... go figure! The most racist people on earth are gonna look at a guy with a turban and go huh, he must be from Amritsar.
Comment
-
It wasn't about the height, he was trying to calculate genetic differences between Indian markers among "Pathans" and Pashtuns, he's claiming there's a 40% difference, but it's arithmetically incorrect.Originally posted by Porus View PostI don't really care about height
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
What was I wrong about exactly? I never claimed they were identical.Originally posted by Golden View PostThey sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
I know, I was referring to the battle that midway took place b/w Aryana and Golden.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostIt wasn't about the height, he was trying to calculate genetic differences between Indian markers among "Pathans" and Pashtuns, he's claiming there's a 40% difference, but it's arithmetically incorrect.
Pathans are Pathans. They will always be Pathans.
Punjabis will always be Punjabis.
One groups likes to fire bullets in the air and receive them headfirst while dancing in a wedding. The other likes to oil themselves up with ghee and 'fight' each other in the mud. And then we get offended when they say Indians are brown and dirty.
Comment
-
Wait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lolOriginally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Posthe's trying to say he's counting ONLY the Indian scores Ok doing it his way, which is mathematically incorrect, it'd be 38% total. Now 23%-15%/38%= 21%, Even using his logic, nowhere near 40% more LOL this guy didn't pass grade school Math.
15 and 23 are fixed scores of two individuals. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much more or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmao
Comment
-
That's not what you were saying though. You're making it out to be that if a white dude can't tell a Pathan and Punjabi apart, then we can't either.Originally posted by Golden View PostThey sure could tell difference between eastern euros/caucasians and pathans, proves Iblis was wrong all along. No need to kiss someone a** and make it that obvious along the way.
Me, or any other member in my family can tell a typical Pathan apart. They have a peculiar smile, wrinkles on their face and olive skin... usually with brown hair. Sets them straight apart.
This doesn't mean people can't be racially ambiguous, but vast majority of Punjabis and Pathans look different. This is undebatable. We're TWO different groups ffs
Comment
-
If you're saying you're only counting Indian marker scores between the two groups. This sums to 38% total. Otherwise what would your denominator be if you rule out all other scores Anyways, so if we take percent difference .23-.15- .,08 , then using your reasoning .08/.38= .21 = 21%. Either way you'd have done your Math wrong, even though even this assumption would be incorrect.Originally posted by Golden View PostWait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lol
15 and 23 are fixed scores. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmao
What you've demonstrated here is that you can't do Math
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Golden View PostWait, from where did you get 38%? Right out of your ass lol
15 and 23 are fixed scores of two individuals. They will not be changed no matter what. So what if I wanted to say how much more or less someone score certain component in % then the other? Math how does it work? lmaoNo please... how DOES it work Sohniya?Originally posted by Golden View PostIf only you payed little more attention in school.
Afghan pashtuns average 15%, pathans average 23%. If one is 15% Indian and other 23%, clearly one of them is 35% less Indian then the other here. Another way way of saying is pathans score little over 1/3 indian compared to afghan pashtuns.
math, how does it work?
Comment

Comment