Difference between a Tajik and a Pashtun

[Samandri]

History of Pakistan. You are Pakistani aren't you?

Also your wrong about some of the ladies you posted. Mongol or no Mongol, uni brow or not, these 3 from your post are very beautiful: (they look better than 80% of Pakistani daal khors I have seen guaranteed)

Tajik women are masculine, have facial features of transgenders and have horrible thick uni-brows which make them scary looking. The only thing they can boast of , is lighter shade of skin colour, but its not exactly helping in case of Tajiks.

[Win Butler]

^You filthy pseudo-Pashtun, you've never met a Tajik woman in your life. Stop commenting on **** you have no knowledge of, British cock sucker.

[ANAcommander]

Tajik men look feminine, while their women look masculine. Lol

And the guy who said these women look better than Pakistani girls.... Bwhahaha

You must be a homosexual or have a thing for donkeys. Lol

[Khostai]

Khostai. show me what avarage Tajiks you see in Afghanistan look like:

Most tajiks looks like massoud, the skin tone is yellowish brown and the nose tip is down and sharp. And most men have flat head like the turks and mongols.

its quite understandable for tajiks to look like that, becuase they are mix of arabs and turks, turks are mixed with mongloid people. So you have people with flat head, yellowish brown skin tone and noses that are pointed down.
They took over persian language and culture, becuase they forgot their own. And now claim that persian is not a race but an cultural group, but of you tell an Iranian that and ask them if they see tajiks as their brothers they will scream no.

Look we pashtuns from Afghanistan and Pakistan can have a lot of diffrences but at the end we are still one ethnic group and we are all ethnic Pashtun. Tajiks just took over Persian culture and language but are not persian. And most educated tajiks in Afghanistan know that, thats why they changed farsi to be called Dari, to create their own identity. But during the wars a lot went to Iran and got brainwashed by Iranian goverment to claim to be persian, becuase most tajiks are still suni, and culture is the only thing Iran has to influence the people, and they quite succeeded in. You have retards like ferdousi who will swear on their mothers grave that they are persian and what not.

Its like an Moroccan will claim to be French, or Africans claiming to be English.

[Forreigner]

Tajik women are masculine, have facial features of transgenders and have horrible thick uni-brows which make them scary looking. The only thing they can boast of , is lighter shade of skin colour, but its not exactly helping in case of Tajiks.

I am not ''Tajik'' or Tajikistani like these women you keep posting are, nor look like these people, so whatever you say man, I don't really care, but posting pictures of ugly people. u do know ugly people are in every in the world, right?

also 2nd girl here in your post still attractive even with mongol eyes and 10x more Attractive than Australoid looking Pakistanis.

[Forreigner]

Tajik men look feminine, while their women look masculine. Lol

And the guy who said these women look better than Pakistani girls.... Bwhahaha

You must be a homosexual or have a thing for donkeys. Lol

Any Pakistani that is not Pashtun/Baloch (a lot Pashtuns unfortunately have mixed and even don't know they are Pashtun anymore lol) look like this:





Pakistanis used to look Iranic, but mixed with Australoid Indians too much. So you Indian Australoid looking people should be the last to comment on uglyness. Most Pakistanis look no different than Indians (same amount of Australoid dilution). Why you people want to be united with Pashtuns I don't know, and why Pashtuns want to be with your Indian looking asses I don't even understand.

I don't care much about Pashtuns on the Pakistani side since they have totally became Indian by now like Punjabis and Sindhis. Only Baloch have kept their identity, so I see them more similar to Afghans. I think Balochs should unite with Afghanistan if Pashtuns don't, since Baloch have the coast line that would be vital for Afghanistan in terms of trade.

[Firdousi]

Autistic Tajik awlade khar. I don't know why chinky eyed Mongols want Khorosan so badly.

Greater Khorasan Map

Pathetic bitch, take your own advice and give some evidence.

Greetings!

You must be by far the dumbest member on PF. You are a good example of what we call in Afghanistan "ghool".

Do you even know the meaning of "reliable source"? You are fake maps mean nothing. This is what happens when you burn down schools. An entire generation of Pashtuns will grow 100% uneducated and brainless. I pity you lol

[Firdousi]

"The people of Hindustān call every country beyond their own Khorasān, in the same manner as the Arabs term all except Arabia, Ajem."

Exactly. Pakistan is India. Pashtuns are from Soleiman mountains in modern Pakistan. Ergo you guys are not Khorasanis. Whether you like it or not. You are Indians dude.

[Forreigner]

Most tajiks looks like massoud, the skin tone is yellowish brown and the nose tip is down and sharp. And most men have flat head like the turks and mongols.

its quite understandable for tajiks to look like that, becuase they are mix of arabs and turks, turks are mixed with mongloid people. So you have people with flat head, yellowish brown skin tone and noses that are pointed down.
They took over persian language and culture, becuase they forgot their own. And now claim that persian is not a race but an cultural group, but of you tell an Iranian that and ask them if they see tajiks as their brothers they will scream no.

Look we pashtuns from Afghanistan and Pakistan can have a lot of diffrences but at the end we are still one ethnic group and we are all ethnic Pashtun. Tajiks just took over Persian culture and language but are not persian. And most educated tajiks in Afghanistan know that, thats why they changed farsi to be called Dari, to create their own identity. But during the wars a lot went to Iran and got brainwashed by Iranian goverment to claim to be persian, becuase most tajiks are still suni, and culture is the only thing Iran has to influence the people, and they quite succeeded in. You have retards like ferdousi who will swear on their mothers grave that they are persian and what not.

Its like an Moroccan will claim to be French, or Africans claiming to be English.

everything in your post is wrong, your not even Pashtun lol. just a daal khor Pakistani/former cow worshipping Indian that became Muslim lmao.

[Sarbani]

Exactly. Pakistan is India. Pashtuns are from Soleiman mountains in modern Pakistan. Ergo you guys are not Khorasanis. Whether you like it or not. You are Indians dude.

How do you know Pashtuns originated in the Suleiman Mountains? There isn't enough data to record the ethnogenesis of Pashtuns.

KPK and Balochistan are part of Pakistan in the same way that Tibet is part of China. Its just an artificial colonial political unification.

[Firdousi]

How do you know Pashtuns originated in the Suleiman Mountains? There isn't enough data to record the ethnogenesis of Pashtuns.

KPK and Balochistan are part of Pakistan in the same way that Tibet is part of China. Its just an artificial colonial political unification.

My statements are backed by historical facts. You can check Tarikh al Hind by Al Biruni. There is no evidence about any massive Pashtun presence in Khorasan. Do you realize that first Pashtun "empires" (actually most of them) were founded in Indostan? Sur kingdom and Lodi kingdom

..the father of Sher Sháh, came to Hindu-stán from Afghánistán, from a place which is called in the Afghán tongue “Shargarí,”* but in the Multán tongue “Rohrí.” It is a ridge, a spur of the Sulaimán Mountains, about six or seven kos in length, situated on the banks of the Gumal. They entered into the service of Muhabbat Khán Súr, Dáúd Sáhú-khail, to whom Sultán Bahlol had given in jágír the parganas of Hariána and Bahkála, etc., in the Panjáb, and they settled in the pargana of Bajwára.

— Abbas Khan Sarwani, 1580 Táríkh-i Sher Sháhí; or, Tuhfat-i Akbar Sháhí, of 'Abbás Khán Sarwání. CHAPTER I. Account of the reign of Sher Sháh Súr.". Packard Humanities Institute. Retrieved 2010-09-04

The most explicit mentioning of the Afghans appears in Al- Baruni’s Tarikh Al-Hind (eleventh century AD). Here it is said that various tribes of Afghans lived in the mountains in the west of India. Al Baruni adds that they were savage people and he describes them as Hindus

The Afghans By Willem Vogelsang Edition: illustrated Published by Wiley-Blackwell, 2002 Page 118

Al Beruni mentions the Afghans once (ed Sachau, I 208) saying that in the western mountains of India live various tribes of Afghans who extend to the neighbourhood of the Sindh (ie Indus) valley. Thus in the eleventh century when the Afghans are first mentioned, they are found occupying the Sulaiman Mountains now occupied by their descendents, the very tribes which the advocates of the exclusive claims of the Durannis will not admit to be true Afghans. Al Beruni no doubt also alludes to them in the passage (loc. Cit .p 199) where he says that rebellious savage races, tribes of Hindus, or akin to them inhabit the mountains which form the frontier of India towards the west

A Glossary Of The Tribes And Castes Of The Punjab And North-West Frontier Province Vol. 3 By H.A. Rose, Denzil Ibbetson Sir Published by Atlantic Publishers & Distributors, 1997 Page 211

1000 years Pashtuns were not much different than today: violent people, fighting each other and unable to embrace civilization.

[Firdousi]

How do you know Pashtuns originated in the Suleiman Mountains? There isn't enough data to record the ethnogenesis of Pashtuns.

KPK and Balochistan are part of Pakistan in the same way that Tibet is part of China. Its just an artificial colonial political unification.

Now brother, can you prove Pashtuns were in Khorasan a thousand year ago? Actually, did "Pashtun identity" even exist back then?

[Samandri]

Exactly. Pakistan is India. Pashtuns are from Soleiman mountains in modern Pakistan. Ergo you guys are not Khorasanis. Whether you like it or not. You are Indians dude.

Pashtun historical homeland is indeed Koh-i-Sulieman range, but you should know that this mountainous range is not confined to Northern Balochistan but also covers Waziristan as well as Loya Paktiya, Zabul and Kandahar areas of Afghanistan. From Ghazni to Sindh valley, the region was inhabited by Afghans in 10th and 11th century. The proof that Afghans were settled in and around Ghazni in 11th century, can be ascertained from Tarikh-i-Bayhaqi of that period who mentions Sultan Masud (son of Mahmud of Ghaznavi) undertaking military expedition against rebellious Afghan tribes of Ghazni mountains.

[Samandri]

Actually, did "Pashtun identity" even exist back then?

Shorty, According to Utbi, the court historian of Mahmud Ghaznavi, Subaktagin recruited Afghans and Khiljis in his army in 10th century. The same book talks about Sultan Mahmud undertaking two military expeditions against Afghans on two separate occasions.

[Firdousi]

Pashtun historical homeland is indeed Koh-i-Sulieman range, but you should know that this mountainous range is not confined to Northern Balochistan but also covers Waziristan as well as Loya Paktiya, Zabul and Kandahar areas of Afghanistan. From Ghazni to Sindh valley, the region was inhabited by Afghans in 10th and 11th century. The proof that Afghans were settled in and around Ghazni in 11th century, can be ascertained from Tarikh-i-Bayhaqi of that period who mentions Sultan Masud (son of Mahmud of Ghaznavi) undertaking military expedition against rebellious Afghan tribes of Ghazni mountains.

With all due respect, my Indian friend, but i am not one of those uneducated Pashtuns like Afghanfootball you are used to fool with your pseudo history. When you claim something you need to prove it. Prove that Soleiman Mountains covered all those places. Reliable sources not fairy tails.

BTW nobody denied those Ghaznawid raids on Pashtuns. I told you, ghool, that Al Biruni who was a member of the Ghaznawid court and partook in most of Mahmud´s raids in Indian pointed out that Pashtuns were a savage Indian tribe. You see? A thousand year ago you were as barbaric and violent as you are today. Old school lol