US Army Empowering Pedophiles To Abuse Afghan Children

[BarakzaiAbdali]

i will remove you from my ignore list on october 25th. enjoy. actually make that november 25th. bye bye.

Any further responses will be delayed till tomorrow due to other obligations. Take it easy frenemy. I am glad to see you are back to your usual self. I expect nothing less than a vicious eviscerating response.

[DaZahroJaam.]

we are not frenimies. whatever that means. and stop using that emoticons. it's makes me uncomfortable.
was it not you who suggested that according to science, it was in a man's nature to rape a woman??
maybe instead of bringing in hina azam's article on proper sharia laws, you should go back to preaching **** like women have no business being out in the fields and provoking innocent men to commit crimes and stuff like that.

everything that i need to say to you or have been saying to you in the last three years have been summarized in the second last post of mine. i am not going to go on and on and on in circles over this anymore.

you have something new to say, amuse me.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

we are not frenimies. whatever that means.

It isn't a choice - and I am not happy about it either. But it is what it is. Its a state of mind and I tried to find a way out of the frenemy zone but I cant.

and stop using that emoticons. it's makes me uncomfortable.



was it not you who suggested that according to science, it was in a man's nature to rape a woman??

Where did you pull that out of? I assume you are referring to that MRI article article study that pissed you off. See this is the essential problem most of the reasonable world has with your kind and why this war wont stop until the likes of you is cordoned off from the rest of humanity. You espouse 1) science - but have no idea of how it applies; 2) learning and history - but have no grasp of it and where it applies; and worse yet 3) you praise "blueprints" but despite promoting secular republicanism or democracy or whatever that disaster clownshow in kabul claims to be - you cannot even understand how to process evidence and then apply it.

Instead, you internalized some piece of data you did not like or clashed with a near ideological/religious view you have developed of the world and decided it ipso facto promoted rape.

maybe instead of bringing in hina azam's article on proper sharia laws, you should go back to preaching **** like women have no business being out in the fields and provoking innocent men to commit crimes and stuff like that.

So once again, culturally because you have minimal idea what rural Pashto and Pashtun culture are like - you have developed a fantasy schema of reality where the Pashtuns are held hostage by Mullah Omar waiting for DZJ to come along and free them and teach them about Tennyson and Shelly.

The reality by the way is that lice is rampant in rural Afghanistan and I commonly had to prescribe treatments for children and adult alike So I think the epitaph "lice head" would be lost on most real down to earth rural Afghans.

everything that i need to say to you or have been saying to you in the last three years have been summarized in the second last post of mine. i am not going to go on and on and on in circles over this anymore.

you have something new to say, amuse me.

So University of Chicago is a premiere center and the MRI driven study that you decided advocated "rape" is discussed here:

http://www.cnn.com/2009/HEALTH/02/19...kinis.objects/

"A supplementary study on both male and female undergraduates found that men tend to associate bikini-clad women with first-person action verbs such as I "push," "handle" and "grab" instead of the third-person forms such as she "pushes," "handles" and "grabs." They associated fully clothed women, on the other hand, with the third-person forms, indicating these women were perceived as in control of their own actions. The females who took the test did not show this effect, Fiske said."

a second quote notes:

Both women and men have something to learn from this line of research, Raison said. Women should be aware of how they are perceived when wearing provocative clothing, and men shouldn't let feelings of impersonal sexual longing interfere with their more personal relationships with other women, including female friends. "Many men make foolish choices because of sexual attraction," he said.

My commentary did not advocate rape. I am personally libertarian, meaning if I were a dictator and you came up to me and said you wanted to wear nothing but a noodle wrapped around your circumference 1000 times or if you wanted to wear a full metal body suit - I would say you could do either but that you could also have to deal with the consequences of both choices.

I stated that a lot of what human beings devised, whether it be religious ideologies, governance rules, and especially mate gaurding behavior were likely survivalistic moves society made to maintain stability and responses to these things we are discovering about our own nature.

What I likely stated was that you pretty much have devised your own religious belief based on popular opinion and not based on science, rationalism, or evidence. This means that you get enraged when research like that points out that men and women respond differently to the other sex's clothing motifs. And in fact, there is a salient point there that MEN ARE PROGRAMMED by their biochemistry and physiology to respond in the ways the authors discovered.

Now one could take this information and apply it in two ways:

1) Teach men that this is why they act retarded and hope that it changes them
2) Teach women how men think and how they are perceived at the biochemical level and let them do what they want with that info with the information pretty much advocating that at the executive level it might be worthwhile for women to wear modest clothing since it would permit a woman to be taken far more seriously by her male colleagues in this still predominantly male dominated world.

The female author first author, Dr. Fiske goes on to note

In fact, it's a byproduct of human evolution, experts say. The first male humans had an incentive to seek fertile women as the means of spreading their genes.

"They're not fully conscious responses, and so people don't know the extent to which they're being influenced," Fiske said. "It's important to recognize the effects."

So my point is that Pashtuns and other people across the ages may have developed female mate gaurding behavior for various reasons in response to their biology.

And when a "lice head" murderer like you comes along and thinks you can tear off the hijabs and burkas off women in that region and just scream out "Freeeeedom! its here, Karzai and me are here to give it to you" - you have no dam-ned idea about what you are doing and why that society evolved that particular custom over time.

Heck, even the Capulets kept Juliet behind high walls.

x

[khushal]

I dont think DZJ has the capacity to understand how biology explains human behavior but she should understand joey- the language she truly understands. I tried explaining that to her but she responded that men who thinks like that are the ones with problems. How naive she is.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi6KQ02inr8

your welcome DZJ.

[DaZahroJaam.]

I dont think DZJ has the capacity to understand how biology explains human behavior but she should understand joey- the language she truly understands.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi6KQ02inr8

your welcome DZJ.

My welcome what, dumbass?? Whose point are you trying to prove here?? And don't you dare bring Joey in to this.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

I dont think DZJ has the capacity to understand how biology explains human behavior but she should understand joey- the language she truly understands. I tried explaining that to her but she responded that men who thinks like that are the ones with problems. How naive she is.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hi6KQ02inr8


your welcome DZJ.

First of all that clip is hilarious.

Second, I know man.

I can't be mean anymore since shes a frenemy but I agree her understanding of history, the sciences and rational application of knowledge are not conducive to a positive outcome for Afghanistan and are pretty uninformed.

Take for instance her statement that Karzai has the right to be corrupt corrupt because Mullah Omar was off in the other corner of the country fighting and doing his IEDthope as they say in your Eastern dialect.

A perfect example was when she said that the Talibs messed up the country for 20 years resulting in the retard fest we see now where the idiot of all idiots Dostum somehow is an elected official.

They were only officially in power 96-'01 and a reasonable portion of that involved incremental fractions of the country lol.

Yet she couldnt correlate that Sherzai and Ulomi, two names that resonate with any Kandahari from our dad's generation because of how stupid they were - facilitated such horrible actions in the city and province that it led to the rapid rise of the Talibs.

That is lol, when she said "messed the country up for 20 years" what she fails to recall is that Ulomi and Sherzai helped create the mess and now they are sitting in the government LOL.

[khushal]

DZJ longs for the Kabul of the 60' and 70's of the mini skirt era. But her own commies trying to force that culture on a conservative armed rural population not only killed 2 million poor afghan villagers but brought the conservativeness to Kabul who today those commies like Ulomi, arse kisser Karzai and the combined military might of NATO couldn't do anything about it.

DZJ should be cursing her commie elders for destroying her dream Kabul.

[DaZahroJaam.]

okay, let's focus on 2001 until the current date. they have lost their power over the country since 2001. how much effect has their behind the scene presence has had in the presence of turmoil in that country?? it has been fourteen years since they stopped being in charge and look at what they are doing to afghanistan. how many years do you think they put towards finding the opportunity to actually get in to power??


hey ****ers, did you hear about the recent cases of polio outbreak in nangrahar?? do you suppose that has something to do with taliban forbidding people from vaccinating or getting their children vaccinated around those areas about two years ago??

did any of you hear of people who are starving and are unable to feed their children in kunduz this week?? three days after taliban took over the province'?? no??

did you hear anything about people being told that unless they participate in poisoning afghan army officials, they better abandon their own homes and run off to wherever they please?? is this sharia?? maybe you should get your heads out of your asses, step out of lala land for a change and focus on what is happening around you.

[DaZahroJaam.]

remember this when you stuff your faces with food for the next three days..while you watch your kids eat, remember that their children are starving for what you believe in.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

okay, let's focus on 2001 until the current date. they have lost their power over the country since 2001.

No, they became an INSURGENCY in 2001. Its the same pattern that has happened anytime a foreign entity entered Afghanistan. Dost Mohammad did the same thing in his time - he became a huge nuisance to the British puppet government of his era.

how much effect has their behind the scene presence has had in the presence of turmoil in that country??

That is an innately stupid and naive question and you pretty much know the answer to that. The better question is: how effect has the presence of dynacorps, canadian military, American military, Jan Mohammad Khan Pedophile Ultra, Abdurrazeq, and Dostum had on the presence of "turmoil" in the country.

Ask the family in Gardez who had their pregnant females shot by "Night raids teams" who kicked down their door. And then ask them who recently re-approved the night raids that appear to not have made a dent in the Taliban's ability to operate.

it has been fourteen years since they stopped being in charge and look at what they are doing to afghanistan. how many years do you think they put towards finding the opportunity to actually get in to power??

Dont be an idiot. When you claim to tell the truth, tell it the full way. How many years do you think Abdullah Abdullah put toward subverting an already retarded foreign hand written constitution and forcing his way into power?

Your commentary is basically akin to claiming: Anytime a bunch of white people come in with guns and find a bunch of fag-got retards like Karzai who are willing to the be their puppets - the locals who don't just accept that hegemony and do what mankind has done from time immemorial (i.e. to fight) are the ones that are in the wrong.

To the contrary, its the bought and sold donkeys in Kabul that are pretty much reliant, as we have seen in recent days, on foreign bombs, foreign guns, and the remnants of Northern Alliance Militias.

By that token, many thousands upon thousands died in the US when Washington and his men mounted an insurrection - were they to simply just "accept" the royalist position?

hey ****ers, did you hear about the recent cases of polio outbreak in nangrahar?? do you suppose that has something to do with taliban forbidding people from vaccinating or getting their children vaccinated around those areas about two years ago??

No dip sh-it, You rely way too much on Khamaa and Tolo, two PROVEN government mouthpiece papers.

did any of you hear of people who are starving and are unable to feed their children in kunduz this week?? three days after taliban took over the province'?? no??

Thats war ja-ck as-s. You are throwing out a thousand red herrings that basic to ANY war. Its a war imposed by your caucasoid monkey handlers Stephen Harper and his former flame George W. Bush. The Taliban, like the Vietcong, is a homegrown insurgency.

Basically, its not me you have to convince - its a boy in Helmand or in Wardag or just about any province who has had to deal with ALP, ANP, ANA pedophelia, corruption, and governmental mistrust who decided he did not want to be forced off the road of his own country to make way for a military convoy of a foreign nation.

Just because you have an imaginary version of Kabul that resembles the show "Friends" crafted in your head doesn't mean that is the reality that will emerge.

did you hear anything about people being told that unless they participate in poisoning afghan army officials, they better abandon their own homes and run off to wherever they please??

Oh really, and none of them, like the guy that killed Karzai's brother, just decided to do it because they got tired of the high level nepotism, rape, corruption, drug running, child abuse and God knows what other crimes your boyfriends in Kabul have comitted?

Nations dont have the fertile ground for an insurgency if their central governments are not this dumb. Remember that, always. it will help you be smarter in life.

is this sharia?? maybe you should get your heads out of your asses, step out of lala land for a change and focus on what is happening around you.

And mayhap, you ought to quit with your histrionic bul-l-sh-it and just focus on the facts.

The facts are these:

1. There is an insurgency that has Afghans in it.
2. That insurgency is fighting a government that has nominal support at best
3. That nominally supported government requires white people's guns to keep it propped it. And to do that they have to kill Afghans and have done so regularly.
4. This has resulted in escalation of this war and created a war of attrition and massive assymmetry

x

[BarakzaiAbdali]

remember this when you stuff your faces with food for the next three days..while you watch your kids eat, remember that their children are starving for what you believe in.

Oh don't worry about that propaganda piece.

how about you embed and tattoo in your mind this grandfather on the right of Mr. Scahill who lost 2 daughter in laws and unborn grand children when your piece of feces mordar donkey gheen Karzai and his acolytes approved a night raid in Gardez that resulted in those women getting shot, point blank in the abdomen?:
http://www.shelfheroes.com/2013/11/d...lm-review.html

That night raid, launched by Mr. McRaven et al per an internal investigation was found to have discovered NO TALIBAN in the house and no fighters locally.

Their wives and children died because of pieces of crap like you who cheerlead that central government.

[DaZahroJaam.]

tsk tsk tsk...that level of anger can not be good for health.

[DaZahroJaam.]

o, and this..




i am sorry for your loss.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

tsk tsk tsk...that level of anger can not be good for health.

Frenemy, I could never be angry with you (the way I get toward Azmal). Merely vigorous oratory and debate. However, your attachment/predilection to war-porn does betray a weird sadistic and rather unladylike side to you.

[DaZahroJaam.]

you will never be able to treat me any worse than you already have. you may have a bad memory, i don't. as for which part of my behavior is "ladylike" and which part, not, we are beyond that point.
when you can't humiliate, bully and harass someone in to walking away and shutting up about their beliefs, you pet them until they feel obliged to pleasing you. i have no interest in proving myself virtuous to you or anyone else out there. in a society where the most esteemed walk around with consciences as dead as yours, there is no room for one to fit in their self respect as well as the respect of society. and between the two, i will always choose my freedom and self respect. regardless of the price it may come with.