Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Contours of the emerging Pashtunistan

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Originally posted by Toramana View Post
    Go empty your terror **** in your Paki commode.
    Aww...too bad language for you...in this age doesnt look good.
    sigpic"When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we only Want to make peace!" (2.11)

    And when it is said to them (hypocrites): "Believe as the people (followers of Muhammad Peace be upon him , Al-Ansar and Al-Muhajirun) have believed," they say: "Shall we believe as the fools have believed?" Verily, they are the fools, but they know not."(2.13)

    Comment


    • #32
      Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
      The more land, the better. The goal is from idealogical perspective a Pashtunistan. Yet, from geographical view, the goal is always as much land as possible. This is basically a goal of any country, same goes for Pashtunistan concept.
      To answer your question in short; as much as we can get/possible.

      you wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?

      you have no ghayrat

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by Pishdad View Post
        you wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?

        you have no ghayrat
        hazara and uzbeks are mongols who slaughtered the native population and stole the land of them so they have no right to possess any region in afghanistan. Tajiks are just eastern iranics who betrayed their old culture and language for farsi and who later mixed with persians and turks. Only pashtuns are native people in afghanistan, who have a language and culture native to afghanistan.
        Last edited by Kushan Saka; 01-08-2015, 07:45 PM.

        Comment


        • #34
          I was in Kabul this summer and I did not sense any of this nationalist crap over there. Everybody seems to live side by side, intermarry, etc. And when people worry, they worry about actual problems in the country: lack of safety, unemployment, lack of freedoms, education, poverty, etc. Afghanistan has a ton of REAL problems and the question as to which people is more native than the other is most certainly not one of them. Nor should it be. Nobody is leaving any time soon.

          Comment


          • #35
            Originally posted by Pishdad View Post
            you wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?

            you have no ghayrat
            I wanna park my car, In your mothers garage. Its a limousine, I hope it fits.
            Don't quote me or speak to me if you hate Afghanistan, you be ignored.

            People with identity crisis will be ignored as well.

            ''When you cant make them see the light, make them feel the heat''
            Ronald Reagan

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cmZyOrUA0

            https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC9sz0nPePI

            Pashto dictionary:
            http://thepashto.com/index.php

            Comment


            • #36
              Originally posted by Kushan Saka View Post
              hazara and uzbeks are mongols who slaughtered the native population and stole the land of them so they have no right to possess any region in afghanistan. Tajiks are just eastern iranics who betrayed their old culture and language for farsi and who later mixed with persians and turks. Only pashtuns are native people in afghanistan, who have a language and culture native to afghanistan.

              dude the mongol invasions were like 800 years ago, get over it. they are now your countrymen but here you are advocating for ethnic cleansing. do you have ghayrat? you're probably some lame nerd living in the west, who do you think you are calling for people who actually live in afghanistan to be dispossessed of their lands? LOL


              tajiks managed to preserve their ancient iranic customs and history and avoid arabization...dari was the medium through which this was achieved. farsi has many soghdian and bactrian loanwords which reflects the central role played by tajiks in the standardization and spread of the language. it is a universal language that has drawn many different ethnic groups into its orbit including pashtuns. there wasn't some backdoor illuminati meeting held where tajiks decided to "betray" their eastern iranic roots, it was a complex historical process. blame ay-rabs

              Comment


              • #37
                Originally posted by DSM0305 View Post
                I wanna park my car, In your mothers garage. Its a limousine, I hope it fits.

                that's not nice.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Originally posted by Zarim View Post
                  I was in Kabul this summer and I did not sense any of this nationalist crap over there. Everybody seems to live side by side, intermarry, etc. And when people worry, they worry about actual problems in the country: lack of safety, unemployment, lack of freedoms, education, poverty, etc. Afghanistan has a ton of REAL problems and the question as to which people is more native than the other is most certainly not one of them. Nor should it be. Nobody is leaving any time soon.
                  Thats only in Kabul. Go to the rural parts and see the racism emerge lol.
                  "Revenge is a dish best served cold".

                  -Old Pashtun proverb




                  "My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Originally posted by Pishdad View Post
                    dude the mongol invasions were like 800 years ago, get over it. they are now your countrymen but here you are advocating for ethnic cleansing. do you have ghayrat? you're probably some lame nerd living in the west, who do you think you are calling for people who actually live in afghanistan to be dispossessed of their lands? LOL


                    tajiks managed to preserve their ancient iranic customs and history and avoid arabization...dari was the medium through which this was achieved. farsi has many soghdian and bactrian loanwords which reflects the central role played by tajiks in the standardization and spread of the language. it is a universal language that has drawn many different ethnic groups into its orbit including pashtuns. there wasn't some backdoor illuminati meeting held where tajiks decided to "betray" their eastern iranic roots, it was a complex historical process. blame ay-rabs
                    i dont hate tajiks and i would never support violence against tajiks but i hate the propaganda of some of them. Farsi has 50% arabic words and is not related to bactrian or sogdian. It orginated in fars and not in Khorasan like some tajik nationalists want to believe.
                    Last edited by Kushan Saka; 01-08-2015, 08:24 PM.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by Kushan Saka View Post
                      i dont hate tajiks and i would never support violence against innocent tajiks but i hate the propaganda of some of them. No farsi has 50% arabic words and is not related to bactrian or sogdian. It orginated in fars and not in Khorasan like some tajik nationalists want to believe.

                      it did not originate in khorasan but emerged as a literary language there. there's a famous account in naser khusrau's (who was from balkh) safarnamah where he encounters a man in tabriz who does not speak dari well. and yes it has soghdian and bactrian loanwords, there are studies on this.




                      ferdowsi avoided using arabic loanwords in the shahnamah. pashtuns envy the shahnamah and fabricated the puta-khazana in order to put their language on par with it. this is a fact!

                      anyway pashtun vs. tajik threads are boring so I don't want to continue this discussion. I just find all the delusional racists on here funny. especially loy afghanistan

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Pishdad View Post
                        it did not originate in khorasan but emerged as a literary language there. there's a famous account in naser khusrau's (who was from balkh) safarnamah where he encounters a man in tabriz who does not speak dari well. and yes it has soghdian and bactrian loanwords, there are studies on this.

                        http://www.iranicaonline.org/article...ge-i-loanwords
                        http://journals.cambridge.org/action...ne&aid=3800364

                        ferdowsi avoided using arabic loanwords in the shahnamah. pashtuns envy the shahnamah and fabricated the puta-khazana in order to put their language on par with it. this is a fact!

                        anyway pashtun vs. tajik threads are boring so I don't want to continue this discussion. I just find all the delusional racists on here funny. especially loy afghanistan
                        go to the tajiikam forum or any other pro-persian and anti-pashtun site and you will see real racists and fascists. Nobody here is comparable to the idiots there and just because pashtuns here want to unite their divided land, this doesnt mean they are racists

                        Comment

                        Working...
                        X