Originally posted by Toramana
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Contours of the emerging Pashtunistan
Collapse
X
-
Aww...too bad language for you...in this age doesnt look good.sigpic"When it is said to them: "Make not mischief on the earth," they say: "Why, we only Want to make peace!" (2.11)
And when it is said to them (hypocrites): "Believe as the people (followers of Muhammad Peace be upon him , Al-Ansar and Al-Muhajirun) have believed," they say: "Shall we believe as the fools have believed?" Verily, they are the fools, but they know not."(2.13)
-
Originally posted by DSM0305 View PostThe more land, the better. The goal is from idealogical perspective a Pashtunistan. Yet, from geographical view, the goal is always as much land as possible. This is basically a goal of any country, same goes for Pashtunistan concept.
To answer your question in short; as much as we can get/possible.
you wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?
you have no ghayrat
Comment
-
hazara and uzbeks are mongols who slaughtered the native population and stole the land of them so they have no right to possess any region in afghanistan. Tajiks are just eastern iranics who betrayed their old culture and language for farsi and who later mixed with persians and turks. Only pashtuns are native people in afghanistan, who have a language and culture native to afghanistan.Originally posted by Pishdad View Postyou wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?
you have no ghayratLast edited by Kushan Saka; 01-08-2015, 07:45 PM.
Comment
-
I was in Kabul this summer and I did not sense any of this nationalist crap over there. Everybody seems to live side by side, intermarry, etc. And when people worry, they worry about actual problems in the country: lack of safety, unemployment, lack of freedoms, education, poverty, etc. Afghanistan has a ton of REAL problems and the question as to which people is more native than the other is most certainly not one of them. Nor should it be. Nobody is leaving any time soon.
Comment
-
I wanna park my car, In your mothers garage. Its a limousine, I hope it fits.Originally posted by Pishdad View Postyou wanna steal more tajik/hazara/uzbek land like your hero momand?
you have no ghayratDon't quote me or speak to me if you hate Afghanistan, you be ignored.
People with identity crisis will be ignored as well.
''When you cant make them see the light, make them feel the heat''
Ronald Reagan
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e7cmZyOrUA0
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QC9sz0nPePI
Pashto dictionary:
http://thepashto.com/index.php
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kushan Saka View Posthazara and uzbeks are mongols who slaughtered the native population and stole the land of them so they have no right to possess any region in afghanistan. Tajiks are just eastern iranics who betrayed their old culture and language for farsi and who later mixed with persians and turks. Only pashtuns are native people in afghanistan, who have a language and culture native to afghanistan.
dude the mongol invasions were like 800 years ago, get over it. they are now your countrymen but here you are advocating for ethnic cleansing. do you have ghayrat? you're probably some lame nerd living in the west, who do you think you are calling for people who actually live in afghanistan to be dispossessed of their lands? LOL
tajiks managed to preserve their ancient iranic customs and history and avoid arabization...dari was the medium through which this was achieved. farsi has many soghdian and bactrian loanwords which reflects the central role played by tajiks in the standardization and spread of the language. it is a universal language that has drawn many different ethnic groups into its orbit including pashtuns. there wasn't some backdoor illuminati meeting held where tajiks decided to "betray" their eastern iranic roots, it was a complex historical process. blame ay-rabs
Comment
-
Thats only in Kabul. Go to the rural parts and see the racism emerge lol.Originally posted by Zarim View PostI was in Kabul this summer and I did not sense any of this nationalist crap over there. Everybody seems to live side by side, intermarry, etc. And when people worry, they worry about actual problems in the country: lack of safety, unemployment, lack of freedoms, education, poverty, etc. Afghanistan has a ton of REAL problems and the question as to which people is more native than the other is most certainly not one of them. Nor should it be. Nobody is leaving any time soon."Revenge is a dish best served cold".
-Old Pashtun proverb

"My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"
Comment
-
i dont hate tajiks and i would never support violence against tajiks but i hate the propaganda of some of them. Farsi has 50% arabic words and is not related to bactrian or sogdian. It orginated in fars and not in Khorasan like some tajik nationalists want to believe.Originally posted by Pishdad View Postdude the mongol invasions were like 800 years ago, get over it. they are now your countrymen but here you are advocating for ethnic cleansing. do you have ghayrat? you're probably some lame nerd living in the west, who do you think you are calling for people who actually live in afghanistan to be dispossessed of their lands? LOL
tajiks managed to preserve their ancient iranic customs and history and avoid arabization...dari was the medium through which this was achieved. farsi has many soghdian and bactrian loanwords which reflects the central role played by tajiks in the standardization and spread of the language. it is a universal language that has drawn many different ethnic groups into its orbit including pashtuns. there wasn't some backdoor illuminati meeting held where tajiks decided to "betray" their eastern iranic roots, it was a complex historical process. blame ay-rabsLast edited by Kushan Saka; 01-08-2015, 08:24 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Kushan Saka View Posti dont hate tajiks and i would never support violence against innocent tajiks but i hate the propaganda of some of them. No farsi has 50% arabic words and is not related to bactrian or sogdian. It orginated in fars and not in Khorasan like some tajik nationalists want to believe.
it did not originate in khorasan but emerged as a literary language there. there's a famous account in naser khusrau's (who was from balkh) safarnamah where he encounters a man in tabriz who does not speak dari well. and yes it has soghdian and bactrian loanwords, there are studies on this.
ferdowsi avoided using arabic loanwords in the shahnamah. pashtuns envy the shahnamah and fabricated the puta-khazana in order to put their language on par with it. this is a fact!
anyway pashtun vs. tajik threads are boring so I don't want to continue this discussion. I just find all the delusional racists on here funny. especially loy afghanistan
Comment
-
go to the tajiikam forum or any other pro-persian and anti-pashtun site and you will see real racists and fascists. Nobody here is comparable to the idiots there and just because pashtuns here want to unite their divided land, this doesnt mean they are racistsOriginally posted by Pishdad View Postit did not originate in khorasan but emerged as a literary language there. there's a famous account in naser khusrau's (who was from balkh) safarnamah where he encounters a man in tabriz who does not speak dari well. and yes it has soghdian and bactrian loanwords, there are studies on this.
http://www.iranicaonline.org/article...ge-i-loanwords
http://journals.cambridge.org/action...ne&aid=3800364
ferdowsi avoided using arabic loanwords in the shahnamah. pashtuns envy the shahnamah and fabricated the puta-khazana in order to put their language on par with it. this is a fact!
anyway pashtun vs. tajik threads are boring so I don't want to continue this discussion. I just find all the delusional racists on here funny. especially loy afghanistan
Comment

Comment