The Pashtunization of Tajiks and Hazaras while the Punjabitization of Pakis Pashtuns

[kanishka]

lol ever heard of Abdur Rehman Khan and his deal with Britain?all he cared about was $$$

how much $$$ did he get?

[Khostai]

Tadjiks it is part of multinational society of Afghanistan. They saved the culture, traditions, language. Tadjiks of Afghanistan saved more originality, than Tadjiks of Tadjikistan.

Tajiks dress is PAshtun, food is Uzback and laguage is Farsir from Iran...Tadjiks don't have there own culture language or what so ever, thats why in the west they are so westernised and forget Afghan culture so fast.

[Zubr-Zubr]

Tajiks dress is PAshtun, food is Uzback and laguage is Farsir from Iran...Tadjiks don't have there own culture language or what so ever, thats why in the west they are so westernised and forget Afghan culture so fast.

It is a choice of Tadjiks. Them nobody compels.

[Zubr-Zubr]

Tajiks dress is PAshtun, food is Uzback and laguage is Farsir from Iran...Tadjiks don't have there own culture language or what so ever, thats why in the west they are so westernised and forget Afghan culture so fast.

For Tadjiks better influence of Pashtun, what influence of englishmen and Russians. In Islamic emirate Afghanistan Tadjiks live as free people. Tadjikistan is the Russian colony. In Tadjikistan the Russian culture prevails above the national Tadjik culture. It is not good.

[tripledouble]

Tajiks dress is PAshtun, food is Uzback and laguage is Farsir from Iran...Tadjiks don't have there own culture language or what so ever, thats why in the west they are so westernised and forget Afghan culture so fast.

so if tajiks are so bad, do you plan to let them create their own country, like a loy tajikistan?

[Khostai]

so if tajiks are so bad, do you plan to let them create their own country, like a loy tajikistan?

of course not, why I would let those racist ****s rule over Uzbacks Pashtuns Turkman and other minorities, you know that the North has a lot of small ethnic groups, Tajiks are not even the majority over there.

[Al-Afghani]

of course not, why I would let those racist ****s rule over Uzbacks Pashtuns Turkman and other minorities, you know that the North has a lot of small ethnic groups, Tajiks are not even the majority over there.

All the ethnic minorities would rather live with Tajiks than Pashtuns, who are either Taliban or ethnic fascists. Hazara, Uzbeks, Turkmen have bad memories of the treatment they received from the Pashtuns.

[Loy Afghanistan]

All the ethnic minorities would rather live with Tajiks than Pashtuns, who are either Taliban or ethnic fascists. Hazara, Uzbeks, Turkmen have bad memories of the treatment they received from the Pashtuns.

If you are not happy you can move back to your ancestors land in Mongolia, Persia, or Arabian desert.

[Kushan Prince]

so if tajiks are so bad, do you plan to let them create their own country, like a loy tajikistan?

That's a FACIST map created by tajik natiaionlists to split Afghanistan up and create diversions. Truth is, Pashtuns are everywhere in Afghanistan today, not only in the south and east.

[tripledouble]

That's a FACIST map created by tajik natiaionlists to split Afghanistan up and create diversions. Truth is, Pashtuns are everywhere in Afghanistan today, not only in the south and east.

well when i see a loy afghanistan map it includes my native districts of Hazara and Mansehra; as well as non-Pashtun areas of Chitral/Kalash and some maps even show Balochistan as part of Afghanistan; so that pisses me off equally.

[Kushan Prince]

well when i see a loy afghanistan map it includes my native districts of Hazara and Mansehra; as well as non-Pashtun areas of Chitral/Kalash and some maps even show Balochistan as part of Afghanistan; so that pisses me off equally.

I can't speak on the Hazara conflict because i'm ignorant on the topic and i'm not from KPK. I agree with Chtiral, it shouldn't be part of the province and most nationalist chitralis want a separate province. But all of Baluchistan was part of Afghanistan at one point and and was called "Godar" by Pashtuns because it bordered with water. Afghanistan was not always landlocked.

[tripledouble]

I can't speak on the Hazara conflict because i'm ignorant on the topic and i'm not from KPK. I agree with Chtiral, it shouldn't be part of the province and most nationalist chitralis want a separate province. But all of Baluchistan was part of Afghanistan at one point and and was called "Godar" by Pashtuns because it bordered with water. Afghanistan was not always landlocked.

well i've been told by some Baloch nationalists(some guys from the BNP) that Balochistan was only legally part of Afghanistan but they had full autonomy over their affairs, so they weren't really integrated with Afghanistan; at least that's what their story is.

[Kushan Prince]

well i've been told by some Baloch nationalists(some guys from the BNP) that Balochistan was only legally part of Afghanistan but they had full autonomy over their affairs, so they weren't really integrated with Afghanistan; at least that's what their story is.

This is correct. Most baloch tribesmen had full control of what happened inside the province but Afghans controlled its politics basically like it was colonial America. Although the relationship with Pashtuns and Baloch people have always been a stable one because of cultural similarities.

[tripledouble]

This is correct. Most baloch tribesmen had full control of what happened inside the province but Afghans controlled its politics basically like it was colonial America. Although the relationship with Pashtuns and Baloch people have always been a stable one because of cultural similarities.

I've always thought Baloch were close to Sindhis cultural, at least that's what i've observed in my interactions with them; also i've noticed that Baloch from Awaran,Lasbela,Gwadar and other Southern and eastern parts of Balochistan over lap with Sindh, i believe only Baloch in the northwest close to the Afghan border, like Nushki,Kalat,Chagai etc over lap with Pashtuns, otherwise the difference between the two groups is like night and day.

[Kushan Prince]

I've always thought Baloch were close to Sindhis cultural, at least that's what i've observed in my interactions with them; also i've noticed that Baloch from Awaran,Lasbela,Gwadar and other Southern and eastern parts of Balochistan over lap with Sindh, i believe only Baloch in the northwest close to the Afghan border, like Nushki,Kalat,Chagai etc over lap with Pashtuns, otherwise the difference between the two groups is like night and day.

Well a lot of baloch tribes have Pashtun origins like the mengals, Ahemdzai, Raisani etc. Baloch's are not a homogenous people, they have multiple origins, a lot of sindhis are mixed with baloch's where they could have absorbed cultural traits. Also, the baloch tribal structure is the same as Pashtuns and the clothing is basically the same, not to mention most Baloch carry the Irano-Afghan phenotype but i will leave anthropology out of this.