Tweet
your a moron. the author has no motive to create bogus people. your too arrogant to admit that I was right when this story was first told.
-
-
We don't know that, we have no idea what the author's motives are. If you weren't a moron; you'd make sure your evidences are air tight; a "pseudonym" witness is as shaky as it gets.
You can't be right when you lack solid evidence.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
the guy exists. he works as a researcher and he is from ghazni.
http://www.afghanistan-analysts.org/...n-local-police
People are actually starting to call it an American made uprising. It sounds like they are trying to copy how the Taliban started in Kandahar back during the civil war of 92-96. But as you can see this is not a peoples uprising. the Taliban spread like wildfire through the country and this did not.Last edited by khushal; 08-06-2013, 07:48 PM.Comment
-
Follow the money Khushal
Who We Are
The Afghanistan Analysts Network (AAN) is an independent non-profit policy research organisation. It aims to bring together the knowledge, experience and drive of a large number of experts to better inform policy and to increase the understanding of Afghan realities. It is driven by engagement and curiosity and is committed to producing analysis on Afghanistan and its region, which is independent, of high quality and research-based. Our aim is to be bi-taraf but not bi-tafawut – impartial, but not indifferent.
Since its establishment in 2009 AAN’s publications have informed and influenced the work of policymakers, journalists, academics and development workers working on Afghanistan. AAN’s analysts are regularly asked to speak at conferences and briefings around the world, and frequently appear as commentators in the media.
Funding
Since its establishment AAN has operated on core funding in order to safeguard the independence of its reporting. Funding has been provided by:
• 2009: The government of Sweden;
• 2010: The governments of Sweden and Norway;
• 2011-2014: A donor consortium of four donors led by the Embassy of Sweden, on behalf of the Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, the Royal Danish Embassy and the Netherlands Embass
Sweden: one of NATO’s most active and effective partners
Sweden is a high capability partner, which has provided valuable support to NATO-led operations mandated by the United Nations. It currently has forces deployed in Kosovo and Afghanistan, and has agreed in principle to participate in the post-2014 NATO-led training mission for Afghan forces.
So basically this is a SWEDISH Think Tank FUNDED by the Swedish Government and IS APART of the NATO Presence in Afghanistan.
My Analysis is that this is just a way NATO is trying to claim the Uprising as their victory; having the authors writing "American Uprising" to give themselves credit/
Just like Obama was trying to claim the Arab Spring.
Email Habib; in't proven to be a legitimate person but is quite possible a Pseudonym for a Swedish writer.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
the aim was that the guy exists.
your explanation is some weird conspiracy theory. It would be in NATO's interest for this to be actually a legit uprising because its an uprising against their enemy.Comment
-
No a WRITER exists under a Pseudonym; not that the guy who he claims that he is; exists.
So no you haven't really given us evidence; you've given someone who is writing commentary under a false identity/.
Your source is not credible evidence.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
You first said he does not exist which was a conspiracy theory even though the author of the first article has no motive to make someone up from nothing. After I proved he exists, now your saying he is not who he says he is, coming up with another conspiracy theory that he is a Swedish writer.
Your conspiracy theory does not even make sense. You do realize that if he is not who he says he is, the whole news network reputation is down the drain. There is no motive for them to put their whole network in that position where they are throwing everything away just for this story that is not even in their funders interest.
If any motive exists, the only one I see is that they are looking out for the swedish tax payers interest of their own government lying to them about some fake uprising, wasting their money and blood on an incompetent policy on afghansitan.Comment
-
No I said he PROBABLY doesn't exist. and that still holds because the actual Person that the writer "claims" to be Probably Doesn't exist.
Someone writing something under a "Pseudonym" doesn't mean that "person" they claim to be exists. There's no conspiracy theory; what there is are apparent inconsistencies in sources which makes your sources dubious and unreliable. Conspiracy would be saying that this is FOR SURE some scam to put one over.Last edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 08-06-2013, 08:28 PM.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
what your saying is similar to what one would say that the interview conducted by Anderson cooper with one of the trayvon martin murder case jurors was all made up because she wouldn't provide her name or reveal her face. that she was some fictitious person and was not one of the jurors.
That's a laughable conspiracy theory just like yours is.Comment
-
No it's not like that at all because we actually have seen and heard these people. LOL
come on Khushal; that was pathetic. your sources are poor; deal with it.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
you haven't seen her, she could have been anyone, maybe one of Anderson coopers secretaries posing as a juror just like how you are implying this emal guy could be a swedish writer.Comment
-
No actually we saw the jurors Khushal lol
ok you're grasping hard now. Your sources are flimsy; we're done here.
actually I should say we heard the jurorLast edited by RevolutionThroughReason; 08-06-2013, 09:19 PM.[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
no one saw her, are trying to say your psychic now by seeing what is hidden. tell us what she looks like then.
Also the whole uprising has been transitioned into the ALPComment
-
Well isn't that what we should want, the people to police themselves
Good for them[QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]
2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.Comment
-
but you said to follow the money. where does the ALP get their money from?Comment
Comment