After some wrestling with Barakzai and RTR (which I do occasionally for rejuvenation of my crude fighting spirit), now I am turning to this very important topic that I have on my mind for a while.
But before I start the discussion, I want to tell you about my views if you've not figured them out yet. First and foremost I am a humanist; then a Pashtun and a Muslim Canadian in the modernist, reformist sense i.e. I am not a passive, uncritical subscriber to values and beliefs whether from the East or the West that are archaic, out of tune with the spirit of current time, and in conflict with universal human rights, equality, free speech, inclusiveness, tolerance, compassion, and accommodation.
I am a liberal secular person but I highly detest the type of fake liberalism that doesn't draw its inspiration from indigenous values and world-views but is borrowed in its entirety and aimed at serving non-indigenous interests.
The topic I want to open for discussion is, for the last 500 years, no civilization in history has as much and so thoroughly dominated the world as the Western Civilization has. And this hegemony has not been limited to one sphere of life---rather, it has manifested in every conceivable dimension of human existence whether economy, politics, military, intellect, technology, values, culture, etc.
Although, there is no denying the fact that there also have been many benign impacts of West's domination of the world, but one can also not ignore the fact that it has lead to severe suffocation in the rest of the world as well where the "OTHERS" find their intellectual and material space to be greatly constricted by the West.
Now that the there are some signs of resurgence (mostly economic) in the rest of the world, it sounds West is not willing to share any space with the rest. It seems, the West wants itself to be the locus and center of global power and wealth forever.
What do you think how does this augur well for the future of humanity? Do you think, is there any possibility of change in Western attitude in terms of shared human destiny ? I am asking you people because you can better understand Western attitude than I can.
But before I start the discussion, I want to tell you about my views if you've not figured them out yet. First and foremost I am a humanist; then a Pashtun and a Muslim Canadian in the modernist, reformist sense i.e. I am not a passive, uncritical subscriber to values and beliefs whether from the East or the West that are archaic, out of tune with the spirit of current time, and in conflict with universal human rights, equality, free speech, inclusiveness, tolerance, compassion, and accommodation.
I am a liberal secular person but I highly detest the type of fake liberalism that doesn't draw its inspiration from indigenous values and world-views but is borrowed in its entirety and aimed at serving non-indigenous interests.
The topic I want to open for discussion is, for the last 500 years, no civilization in history has as much and so thoroughly dominated the world as the Western Civilization has. And this hegemony has not been limited to one sphere of life---rather, it has manifested in every conceivable dimension of human existence whether economy, politics, military, intellect, technology, values, culture, etc.
Although, there is no denying the fact that there also have been many benign impacts of West's domination of the world, but one can also not ignore the fact that it has lead to severe suffocation in the rest of the world as well where the "OTHERS" find their intellectual and material space to be greatly constricted by the West.
Now that the there are some signs of resurgence (mostly economic) in the rest of the world, it sounds West is not willing to share any space with the rest. It seems, the West wants itself to be the locus and center of global power and wealth forever.
What do you think how does this augur well for the future of humanity? Do you think, is there any possibility of change in Western attitude in terms of shared human destiny ? I am asking you people because you can better understand Western attitude than I can.

Comment