3 Ghazni elders killed by Taliban after uprising

[Afghanistan2010]

Are you really as stupid as you look?

This is another documentary made by him.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

I'm definitely not as stupid as you look, with that disgusting rat-beard of yours LOL

I saw the clip, you said that these fighters are sitting there while an attack helicopter flies by. All we see is that different images of various footage. Not fighters sitting there.


you have no ability to think logically. You're like a woman

[Afghanistan2010]

Now you attack woman ?

You should watch this documentary and you will know,how people are brainwashed.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

which woman did I attack?

I'm just saying you're a male but you think like a woman. You don't use logical thinking.

That's insulting you as a male, I don't have same expectations from women.

Ok I will watch the documentary

[khushal]

I said confirm, not support,


and the U.S. and Iran both confirming the drone .....disinformation once again. The U.S. MAY just want the Iranians to THINK they have a drone, to plant a device that could infiltrate the Iranian computer networks.

Must suck seeing how your idiotic argument can pretty much sabotage your own claims LOL

Your saying non sense. Thats your hypthosis which belongs in the fantasy world.

second which all parties confirm funding

[khushal]

which woman did I attack?

I'm just saying you're a male but you think like a woman. You don't use logical thinking.

That's insulting you as a male, I don't have same expectations from women.

Ok I will watch the documentary

your saying that women dont think like logically. your speaking non sense again.

[khushal]

Watch this documentary. it is from the american perspective:
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/obamaswar/view/

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Khushal, lol I know you're angsty because I'm showing the failures of your scapegoat/argument tactic, honestly I think you've developed a whole new logical fallacy

and the only reason you're getting angsty now about what I said to afghanistan2010 is because it would inevitably imply you're effeminate too for the same reasons. LOL

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Your saying non sense. Thats your hypthosis which belongs in the fantasy world.

second which all parties confirm funding

I'm just using your logic.....it could be disinformation

both America and the Taliban confirm they get international funding.

[khushal]

Khushal, lol I know you're angsty because I'm showing the failures of your scapegoat/argument tactic, honestly I think you've developed a whole new logical fallacy

and the only reason you're getting angsty now about what I said to afghanistan2010 is because it would inevitably imply you're effeminate too for the same reasons. LOL

Im not angsty. What your doing is different from what I am doing. What I am saying is that the claims have to backed up by evidence otherwise it is questionable. What your doing is coming up with hypthosis that sane people laugh at.

On the second part this is what you said:

you have no ability to think logically. You're like a woman

You comparing all women to someone that dont have the ability to think logically. how can that be when we have female doctors, engineers, etc.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

your evidence are just commentaries and could in fact be disinformation ...so by what your own logical fallacies .....it would be the same thing, so they are not evidence after all. You never know who could be faking what these days. right?!??!?!? LOL

I never said all women, remember context , there's always exceptions.

Like Faye handing you your back side in debates, that shows that certain women can think logically.

[khushal]

your evidence are just commentaries and could in fact be disinformation ...so by what your own logical fallacies .....it would be the same thing, so they are not evidence after all. You never know who could be faking what these days. right?!??!?!? LOL

I never said all women, remember context , there's always exceptions.

Like Faye handing you your back side in debates, that shows that certain women can think logically.

Thats your hypthosis. not mine. I concede when presented with evidence but you have yahoos saying things that dont make sense and cant back it up with evidence.

on the second thing, you were talking to one person and comparing him to one woman and the reason you were comparing hinm to a woman is because you think he does not have the ability to think logically therfore you beleive that females dont have the ability to think logically.

A few pages back you complemented Faye that you found it shocking that a farangi woman could debate well against a pashtun man. That was an uncalled insult itself against females and farangi.

you are back tracking because you have been proven wrong again

When I ask Faye for evidence, she tells me to find it myself. thats her debating skills. lol

[RevolutionThroughReason]

don't try to switch things around; its yours, it just demonstrates that according to your standards, which by the way is changing goal posts, that your "evidence" thus cannot be admitted as evidence. If you take it as evidence then it shows you cherry pick and demonstrates how severely Taliban supporters have confirmation bias.


no That's not an insult to women, in fact it's a compliment; that even with this hyper macho facade of Pashtun pride and self righteousness you have over being a Pashtun people like yourself dish out, you were outclassed by a woman and a farangay.

Your claim that it's an insult, is an emotional reaction not a logical one, very effeminate. It's sad to see the men who claim to be so Pashtun act so effeminate.

http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2005/01/050121100142.htm

"This, according to Rex Jung, a UNM neuropsychologist and co-author of the study, may help to explain why men tend to excel in tasks requiring more local processing (like mathematics), while women tend to excel at integrating and assimilating information from distributed gray-matter regions in the brain, such as required for language facility. These two very different neurological pathways and activity centers, however, result in equivalent overall performance on broad measures of cognitive ability, such as those found on intelligence tests."

[khushal]

don't try to switch things around; its yours, it just demonstrates that according to your standards, which by the way is changing goal posts, that your "evidence" thus cannot be admitted as evidence. If you take it as evidence then it shows you cherry pick and demonstrates how severely Taliban supporters have confirmation bias.


no That's not an insult to women, in fact it's a compliment; that even with this hyper macho facade of Pashtun pride and self righteousness you have over being a Pashtun people like yourself dish out, you were outclassed by a woman and a farangay.

Your claim that it's an insult, is an emotional reaction not a logical one, very effeminate. It's sad to see the men who claim to be so Pashtun act so effeminate.


http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases...0121100142.htm

I never came up with a nonsense hypthesis like you. your a strange person and cant keep focus.

Claiming that women are illogical is not an insult? what kind of a strange world do you live in. you insulted women and now your backtracking trying to come up with scientific articles claiming women are intellectually inferrior. you are filled with nonsense hythosis.

Faye outclassing me? Come on ask her about how she insulted pashtuns because she couldnt debate rationally. The admins were forced to delete her posts. thats classy in your world only, not in the sane world.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

claiming women are illogical isn't an insult; it's just how women GENERALLY are, just like claiming most woman bleeds (some do not for whatever reason) once a month isn't an insult, but if you say a man bleeds once a month. LOL well it may not be taken lightly.

You're looking at things from the Western cultural paradigm.

As for whatever else; if it's nonsense, you're right it is nonsense because I'm using your Pattern of Thinking/Argument; so of course it is nonsense, I am showing you how ridiculous your claim is. Thus now that you acknowledged it is nonsense.

My claim is validated by you. Thanks. :D