Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason
View Post
In fact I can prove to you now you are wrong.
He includes the phrase "pa asl" under 1.4 itself with subdivided meanings of that particular phraseology under a/b
Clearly delineating that you are wrong.
In a and b he is showing how the phrase can be used to fit the definition you want in 1.4
But in NO WAY does he make this a subset of asl ki which is clearly divided.
In fact it falls under the beginnings of 1.3: "FACT, SUBSTANCE, PRINCIPLE
and then he uses "pa asl ki" to show the utilization in this sense.
You are welcomed to write him. But your rate limiting factors are the surrounding phrases. Until you can make the masdar asl mean something it doesnt you are utterly wrong when it comes to the meanings of these words.

Comment