Taleban are Pakistan's Army Proxies not Pashtun Nationalists

[faye]

pashtun nationalists are not pashtuns.

if they are not pashtuns, they can't be pashtun nationalists in the first place. how can you internet warriors tell pashtuns what they are and are not, anyway?
you're french aren't you? westernised with superficial extremist wannabe desires.

[abassinafghan]

pashtun nationalists are not pashtuns.

so are not wanna be arabs , or pan islamists or wannabe jihadis who let dance their own sisters on the street on daylight , feel no obligation to cover them and stopping them from such behaviour in their own countries

[Afghanistan2010]

if they are not pashtuns, they can't be pashtun nationalists in the first place. how can you internet warriors tell pashtuns what they are and are not, anyway?
you're french aren't you? westernised with superficial extremist wannabe desires.

they pretend to be pashtuns with nationalism,but they have no knowledge who pashtun really are,what it means to be a pashtun,most of those so called "nationalists" are in Khyberpakhtunkwa and they are in a identity crisis therefore they want to show off and say we are pashtuns this and united pashtunistan....pe khula ke de gorrah derr mutta kama pakhtun peshane na khabare dumra dumra ke ...drimmay murderkhoro...

i do not have any extremist desires,i do not seek the destruction of any peaceloving,freemdomloving people but i support resistance against crusaders,settlers,and others who try to terrorize you,your people and your country.And i stress upon such resistance and i have desires for this to see those who are oppressed rising and defending themselves.

And one does not harm to the other without a reason which have to be valid.

i never call myself other than a muslim from afghanistan,the land of the mountains and brave people.

[Afghanistan2010]

Ansari means descended from the Ansars during the time of Muhammad(saw)



Not sure how legit this is but I guess that is an explanation.

Ansar = means protector,helper and in that very specific period it had a different meaning,they were recalled as if they were a tribe,but stil they are remembered as the protectors and helpers.

A translation would be also = partisan

[khushal]

Ansar is not a tribe, it is an arabic word meaning patron, one who aids. When the muslims fled Mecca, the people that took them in and protected them were called Ansars. It later was referred to muslim warriors who were fast on the battlefield. the word kept evolving with the times.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Ansar = means protector,helper and in that very specific period it had a different meaning,they were recalled as if they were a tribe,but stil they are remembered as the protectors and helpers.

A translation would be also = partisan

That's the original meaning yes; but the applied meaning became people who were descended from those people in the context of Muhammad(saw)'s companions.

[khushal]

Not seeing a statistical analysis; just a narrative

Remember th Questta shopkeeper who claimed to be the Taliban number 2 and took close to a million from the best and the brightest minds the sole superpower had to offer. These things are also happening in the local level as well. This whole war is a scam. You dont know what your talking about becuase you dont know afghans in afghanistan. Remember when I told you that it is the "dabai" of the the Talib that can get rid of this corruption.
If anyone has another solution, then bring it forth. Some of you people have criticism with no solution just like the stupid americans............ well most of you are stupid americans.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

right, so no statistics. Ok got that.

[khushal]

What statistics? so what happened to all this money with nothing to show for it?
you show us where the money went and ill show the statistics
trillion dollars spent -> nothing to show for it -> scam

that is the equation

[RevolutionThroughReason]

well do an analysis with research supporting it; then maybe it will have credibility, I am not outrightly denying what you're saying but you're making very definitive conclusions on abstract evidence.