Originally posted by Akherousin
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Global inbreeding
Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
-
Originally posted by WawrinaThanks for your honest...reply.
What is..the Jewish Conspiracy Monthly ?
^ Wawrina your not too good with sarcasm are you? lol----------
*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Originally posted by Karachilike I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here
Comment
-
sorry for missing this out, it's probably the most pertinent comment on the threadOriginally posted by R3SISTANC3 View PostSorry brother but this is pseudo nonsense.
It shows nations and areas with majority whites, caucasoids, as less inbred? How is that possible when they are all WHITE and have the same genetic MARKERS? In fact whites are probably the most inbred people on the planet second to blacks of Africa. They have a common physical characteristic standard in these regions.
The least inbred people are the Green areas since both Negroid, Mongoloid, and Caucasoid markers exist all over the regions in vast degrees. These regions have seen invasions from all types and groups and their remnants settled all over. This is why you will find Arabs, Persians, Afghans, Tajiks, Turks, Kurds, Jews etc. of all sorts: dark, light, tall, short, big eyes, small eyes, light eyes, dark eyes.
you are correct when you say that some countries on the map are all white whereas the inbred ones are more color varied.
however, does it really matter? let's take 1 family 200 years ago that was half black and half white, one parent was a retard recessive carrier. their offspring all married each other. this multipled up the recessive retard genes in the parents 200 years ago that were of different skin color. 2 of the 4 children would have the retard gene. this multiplies up. eventually cross-cousins are more likely, though they all appear multi colored. eventually half of the expanded population are genetic retard carriers, and when two of them make love a full genetic retard is produced. bradford, england, texas, us are apparently good examples.
does it make sense?Last edited by Guest; 03-07-2012, 11:39 PM.
Comment
-
Asad Mercury Malik Documental 07870 762737 - YouTube
possibly the most intelligent person in bradford
[/URL]
Comment
-
That is rubbish backed up by studies done by people that actually know this sh*t, not by idiots like youself. You have forgotten that historically 80% of marriages were by cousins. I showed you the link and you did not respond because you cant respond.Originally posted by roadrunner View PostIt does not decrease over time in an expanding population. It gets multiplied.
i realize you won't understand this.
wtf are you on about here?
If you have an inbred population, it is more likely that there will be two carriers of the same genetic problem.
This is fact and logic. Your rubbish about 2% late 30s is so stupid you dont realize it though.
PS: there is no such thing as a retard gene so stop talkign about nonsense.
Comment
-
i didnt see any link you posted.
even if what you said is true that 80% of marriages were by cousins, what does it prove? nothing.. it shows that people in the past were inbred and that the populations were not as healthy as they are now. inbred populations are not leading the world.
you have no real life experience it would seem.
Comment
-
what makes you think they didn't know where obl was? ever heard of spy verses spy verses spy verses spy..............? the talibs have been used by the u.s and pakistan.Originally posted by Al Hanif View PostIt took you more than 10 years to find Osama and you still can't beat shepherds in flip flops, who are you trying to fool, Dave ?
Comment
-
-



Comment