Global inbreeding

[JattApache]

bharati, this nerd is just bs ing. the map is completely stupid and he is just tongue in cheeking to entertain his tiny brain.

He is trolling, or he is just a fool

[roadrunner]

links are trolling? links are fact.

[Al Hanif]

links are trolling? Links are fact.

rofl

[JattApache]

links are trolling? links are fact.

What links ?
Show me a link that says that the majority of indian punjabis marry their cousins ? Liar lol

You are a fool

[roadrunner]

i've given you links showing that south india is the global epicentre of inbreeding.

i've given you links showing that jatts and rajputs inbreed a lot.

You claim it doesn't happen much amongst Indian Jatts. I would say this isn't true though i would say it happens less than south indians for obvious reasons.

[JattApache]

i've given you links showing that south india is the global epicentre of inbreeding.

i've given you links showing that jatts and rajputs inbreed a lot.

You claim it doesn't happen much amongst Indian Jatts. I would say this isn't true though i would say it happens less than south indians for obvious reasons.

I don't care about south indians or pakistanis jatts

Show me the link that the MAJORITY of punjabis indians marry their cousins, because that's not the case

Ok now I will stop to talk with this stupid darky gujarati troll

[Wahe Guru]

jatts in pakistan and jatts in india are culturally very similar.

most sikh jatts migrated from pakistan at partition. the same culture continues.

most sikh jatts migrated from pakistan at partition - NO NO NO

This is my point - you often keep on talking rubbish in short sentences but you insist you are correct.

A minority of Jats migrated from Pakistan since majority of Jats living in the area of West Punjab now in "Pakistan" had converted to Islam by about 1500. Majority of migrants were other Sikh castes and Hindus. Probably a majority of Jats who migrated at partition actually were from families who had been allotted land by British after WW1 in districts like Lyallpur (Faisilabad) which had been forest land and was then converted to agricultural land after WW1. And all such Jats still had their villages and lands in East Punjab and they went back to their original villages.

[Wahe Guru]

jatts in pakistan and jatts in india are culturally very similar.

most sikh jatts migrated from pakistan at partition. the same culture continues.

Jats in Pakistan and Jats in India are culturally very similar. True. But not for marriages because those Jats who converted to Islam they then did start practice of marrying cousins as allowed by Islam - but I don't think all Muslim Jats (or Rajputs) do it or that they always do it.

Cousin marriage was a practice followed by Arabs before Islam so it was allowed in Islam.

Traditionally Jats had strict rules for marriage to prevent inbreeding - and that was always followed very strictly by Sikh and Hindu Jats. It is known that inbreeding causes genetic diseases and that's why inbreeding is forbidden to Jats and also to other groups in north India. There might however be a few smaller groups of people (not Jats) who at some point started to violate these traditions but even they I do not think do it as a rule.

[Khostai]

Funny how all the inbreed countries are Muslim countrys, I think this guy wanted to show that we muslims are in this mess becuase our peopel are retarded inbred, thats way we have so much wars and poverty, was that your intetion roadrunner?
If inbred means marrieng your cousin than it can be correct, in Islam its allowed to marry a cousin, in Christian relligion not, that's way Europe and US have less inbred, country like Japan and China in old times was common to marry a cousin but becuase they copied the lifestile of Westerners they don't do that much anymore.

But I got to say marrieng a cousin is a bad idea, In Afghanisatn they show almost on every program that it is not good to do that.
And most peopel who married in the family there children are not really bright or healthy, I am really glad that my father and mother are starnagers to each other.

[Wahe Guru]

I don't care about south indians or pakistanis jatts

Show me the link that the MAJORITY of punjabis indians marry their cousins, because that's not the case

Ok now I will stop to talk with this stupid darky gujarati troll

I like the look of your troll pet. Dont feed it too much. It will become overweight.

[khushal]

Funny how all the inbreed countries are Muslim countrys, I think this guy wanted to show that we muslims are in this mess becuase our peopel are retarded inbred, thats way we have so much wars and poverty, was that your intetion roadrunner?
If inbred means marrieng your cousin than it can be correct, in Islam its allowed to marry a cousin, in Christian relligion not, that's way Europe and US have less inbred, country like Japan and China in old times was common to marry a cousin but becuase they copied the lifestile of Westerners they don't do that much anymore.

But I got to say marrieng a cousin is a bad idea, In Afghanisatn they show almost on every program that it is not good to do that.
And most peopel who married in the family there children are not really bright or healthy, I am really glad that my father and mother are starnagers to each other.

What are you talking about. Marrying first cousins has nothing to do with religion, it is more cultural than anything else. Judaism, christianity and Islam allows first cousin marriages.
First cousin marriages are common in the Indian subcontinent, keeping wealth in the family and trust is stronger in the family.

But the whole thing about offsprings of first cousin marriages as having genetic defects is a myth. Studies have shown that genetic defects in first cousin marriages are not that much higher than the general population.
http://www.nytimes.com/2002/04/04/us...ted=all&src=pm

Famous people in the west that married first cousins:
1)Albert Einstein (parents were also first cousins) he was a math and physics whiz but he couldnt comb his hair. inbeeding caused him to become a retarded groomer.
2)Thomas Jefferson
3)Benjamin Franklin
4)Edgar Allen Poe
5)Charles Darwin
6)Franklin Roosevelt
7)Rudy Giuliani

20% of all marriages in the world are first cousins and 80% of all marriages historically have been between first cousins. People are as ignorant today as back then.
If Roady is a retard, its not because of his first cousin parents, its just simply because the stupid gene in him beat the sh*t out of the intellectual gene in him. The Stupid gene is dominent in him.

Resistance is right, the most diverse region in the world with the most diverse genetic markers is the place where the three races(Caucasian, Negroid, Mongloid) meet.

[JattApache]

If Roady is a retard, its not because of his first cousin parents, its just simply because the stupid gene in him beat the sh*t out of the intellectual gene in him. The Stupid gene is dominent in him.

[tor_khan]

Everybody who walks on this planet is descending from some level of inbreeding.

Simply put if we follow this model and we go back 5 generations, we are descended from 32 great-great-great grandparents. Double that - 10 generations - and we would be related to 1024 great ancestors:

SELF
2 PARENTS
4 GRANDPARENTS
8 GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
16 GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
32 GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
64 GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
128 GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
256 GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENT
512 GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GREAT-GRANDPARENTS
(keep on doubling the figure to go back another generation)

Twenty generations back (about 450 years) we are related to 1,048,576 great ancestors. Five generations before, our existence depends on 33,554,432 people - another five generations before (30 generations back) and we are now counting in figures over a billion. Continue this trend and go back to the time of the Romans and the time-line by which the Gregorian Calendar is fixed (2000 years), then we have a total number of one million trillion people in our immediate ancestry.

According to those who study paleodemographics there is something wrong here ... because that last figure is more than the said number of people who have ever lived.

The pyramid model means that two uniquely unrelated people came together to parent the next generation. However, a different model may show that two parents of one of our ancestors might not have been so distantly related and therefore there may be overlap. An individual may have cousin-parents and thus six great-grandparents rather than eight. Before the time of mass travel when people lived in small villages, individual genes came often from a tight pool and where cousin parents would not have been unusual.

[roadrunner]

most sikh jatts migrated from pakistan at partition - NO NO NO

This is my point - you often keep on talking rubbish in short sentences but you insist you are correct.

A minority of Jats migrated from Pakistan since majority of Jats living in the area of West Punjab now in "Pakistan" had converted to Islam by about 1500. Majority of migrants were other Sikh castes and Hindus. Probably a majority of Jats who migrated at partition actually were from families who had been allotted land by British after WW1 in districts like Lyallpur (Faisilabad) which had been forest land and was then converted to agricultural land after WW1. And all such Jats still had their villages and lands in East Punjab and they went back to their original villages.

are you inbred, wahe, because you cannot read (or write).

I meant Sikh Jatts were living in Pakistan and migrated to India at partition. Most Sikh Jatts are from the pakistani area of punjab

[roadrunner]

Jats in Pakistan and Jats in India are culturally very similar. True. But not for marriages because those Jats who converted to Islam they then did start practice of marrying cousins as allowed by Islam - but I don't think all Muslim Jats (or Rajputs) do it or that they always do it.

Cousin marriage was a practice followed by Arabs before Islam so it was allowed in Islam.

Traditionally Jats had strict rules for marriage to prevent inbreeding - and that was always followed very strictly by Sikh and Hindu Jats. It is known that inbreeding causes genetic diseases and that's why inbreeding is forbidden to Jats and also to other groups in north India. There might however be a few smaller groups of people (not Jats) who at some point started to violate these traditions but even they I do not think do it as a rule.

it perhaps explains why hindu jatts look like south indian tamils.

they've had to mix over the centuries.