ill be the first person to say the talib rule was ridiculous and pretty bad, better than what came before them though. i dislike them because of how they ruled, not who they were backed by. but i won't say they are paki slaves or have the interests of pakistan in mind when the leadership makes its decisions. what gets me though is that people still deny the paki-talib link.
i mean, look at karzai, do u think he would of made an outburst with the paki delegation about delivering mullah omar on talks if he didn't think, or the whole damn world, that pakistan has a hand in the insurgency? would the US ruin 6 decades of an excellent paki-US relationship if they didn't know for sure that pakistan was harboring the taliban?
what i think of the US and karzai aside, these groups do not go out of their way to make hard accusations if they, with the best intel in the world, did not believe it to be true.
i mean, look at karzai, do u think he would of made an outburst with the paki delegation about delivering mullah omar on talks if he didn't think, or the whole damn world, that pakistan has a hand in the insurgency? would the US ruin 6 decades of an excellent paki-US relationship if they didn't know for sure that pakistan was harboring the taliban?
what i think of the US and karzai aside, these groups do not go out of their way to make hard accusations if they, with the best intel in the world, did not believe it to be true.

Comment