Originally posted by Jamaludeen
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Amirul Mumineen Mullah Omar Mujahid (hafidhahullah) tells his lifestory in his own vo
Collapse
X
-
But by ridding tv, you don't actually get rid of western tv because people can still access it online. So there is no point of banning tv. If people are dumb, they will stay dumb.. By banning tv.. They wont become smarter or more intelligent..Lol and they still wont know whether they are being brainwashed or not..Originally posted by Al Hanif View PostMy bad, I was talking about western TV.
A friend can brain wash you.. Too.. Even if he claims
To be a Muslim..Last edited by JAMALUDEEN; 02-29-2012, 07:33 PM.
Comment
-
Yes.Originally posted by Jamaludeen View PostBut by ridding tv, you don't actually get rid of western tv because people can still access it online. So there is no point of banning tv. If people are dumb, they will stay dumb.. By banning tv.. They wont become smarter or more intelligent..
I just said that with Internet, they have a way wider range of independant sources.
In the case of TV, it's state propaganda.
For example, only thanks to Internet we know the real reasons why NATO attacked Libya.
It was because of golden dinar and centralized banks.
None of the western media outlets mentionned this.
RussiaToday did though.
This clearly shows that TV is dangerous, especially in the West, because it provides only a single point of view.
Comment
-
I am not for banning TV.Originally posted by Jamaludeen View PostBut by ridding tv, you don't actually get rid of western tv because people can still access it online. So there is no point of banning tv. If people are dumb, they will stay dumb.. By banning tv.. They wont become smarter or more intelligent..Lol and they still wont know whether they are being brainwashed or not..
A friend can brain wash you.. Too.. Even if he claims
To be a Muslim..
I think Catya and Pakhtunzai are.
I just said that I prefer the Internet.
Comment
-
That doesn't justify banning tv. TV is not dangerous, and if people are dumb enough to fall for the propaganda .. They will be dumb enough to fall for the propaganda on the Internet.Originally posted by Al Hanif View PostYes.
I just said that with Internet, they have a way wider range of independant sources.
In the case of TV, it's state propaganda.
For example, only thanks to Internet we know the real reasons why NATO attacked Libya.
It was because of golden dinar and centralized banks.
None of the western media outlets mentionned this.
RussiaToday did though.
This clearly shows that TV is dangerous, especially in the West, because it provides only a single point of view.
Comment
-
Lol you responded so I thought you did. My bad... I'm starting to be real suspicious of catya.. There are other better ways of providing information to the public through the tv..Originally posted by Al Hanif View PostI am not for banning TV.
I think Catya and Pakhtunzai are.
I just said that I prefer the Internet.Last edited by JAMALUDEEN; 02-29-2012, 09:24 PM.
Comment

Comment