Hamid Ghool paki says Kabul should be burn

[hamid954]

ISI Afghan's Number one enemy "Hamid Ghool" says Kabul should be burn. Wake up Afghans - YouTube

[abassinafghan]

thats the words of zia ul haq , thats the word of every paki , and it means kabul should burn so afghanistan dont come its feet ....

i say let us wait , maybe kufurabad will start to burn ???

[Shehbaz Khan]

Wikileaks say and we accept !

[MostafaM]

Wikileaks say and we accept !

Mr. "Apologetic Paki",

that´s what your own media broadcasted.

And it is common knowledge that wikileaks hasn´t manipulated any information they had gathered.

Stick to the topic.

[Levanaye Zalmaye]

Mostafa jana, Shehbaz Khan is our brother but it seems as though he is suffering from Pakistan's national disease: Denial.

Even if Hamid ghul said it in front of Shehbaz Khan, he would deny it.

[MostafaM]

Zalmiya wrora,

I have read many of his murtad-like comments in the last 6-7 months.

I don´t know about others but I don´t consider him as a fellow "Pashtun brother".

[Afghanistan2010]

To be considered ( as Pashtun ) is the one who believes in Allah and his Messenger and the last day,forget about the rest.

[Admin Khan]

Mostafa jana, Shehbaz Khan is our brother but it seems as though he is suffering from Pakistan's national disease: Denial.

Even if Hamid ghul said it in front of Shehbaz Khan, he would deny it.

You can't blame him. Cognitive science backs this up very lovely.

When a child, at a very young age is indoctrinated with ideologies such as "Pakistan is the leader of the Muslim world" or "Pakistan was made for Muslims", it's obvious that if a Pakistani leader says something that would negate their teachings, they would dismiss it or better yet find a reason to dismiss it. They are even brainwashed during their Islamiyat class, where they paint Pakistan as the leader of the Muslim world. It's predicate logic for them. Simply true or false. No middleway, anything bad = false.

I mean, can you imagine not standing up for the Pakistani anthem? or not reciting it? I'll be honest, in the USA you do not have to stand for the anthem. Uff, oh, could you imagine someone in Pakistan not standing in the assembly line, where they yell "Stand at ease!!!" Time for the anthem? A few shots to the butt is what we can expect, or possibly a snuff. I've seen it with my own eyes.

In a more simple way:

Let P be Pakistan.

P: P!=Wrong.

If( P==Wrong)--> Deny, Deny, Deny!!

This is a South Asian problem*. Institutions don't teach these kids how to properly reason, or think, which is why they trail so far below Europe and USA in innovation, or forward-thinking.

*Not all South Asians suffer from this problem, albeit a large majority do.

[MostafaM]

To be considered ( as Pashtun ) is the one who believes in Allah and his Messenger and the last day,forget about the rest.

You mean before Islam arrived in modern day Afghanistan, Pashtuns weren´t Pashtuns because they weren´t Muslim but something else?

Their culture, language and habits etc didn´t exist?

And what do the categories of ethnicity and religion have to do with each other?

[Karachi]

I hate this Hamid Gul guy, every time I see his face, I feel like shooting the screen

[hamid954]

Pakistan murdabad.

[janaan]

Not a fan of hamid gul but for the sake of fairness, we can never be sure Hamid gul said that! He probably still wants kabul to burn but thats another thing!

[roadrunner]

shahbaz khan sounds like the most intelligent poster on this thread.

[Breshna]

He should...burn...himself.

[Karpo]

It is debatable whether Hamid Gul said that or not, and if he did say it, then what was the context? Did he mean the illegal Najibkhar government -that 'government' that invited the Soviets as some champions of that war put it? and in the process murdered millions of Afghans. Because capitals usually refer to the present government, illegal or not, in place. Secondly, Hamid Gul today has been staunchly opposed to the US-led war in Afghanistan as well as Pakistan's support for the US-led war, support that is critical to the continuation of the war. He is allegedly behind the latest and apparently successful efforts to make the closure of the supply routes permanent, and continue to put pressure on the so-called 'leaders' to stop the drone attacks and end Pakistan support for the US-led war. Does anyone object to that?