If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Pakistan is never going to have a pashtun leader, all we can relay on is Pakis...sadly.
Ya most of our prime ministers and presidents would be punjabis but remember Ghulam ishaq khan was a Pashtun , beside a pashtun army chief can declare marshal law and can become a dictator. You are clearly differentiating between pakis and pashtuns. I think you are one of those afghan wannabes of UK who thinks that a pashtun can not be a pakistani.
Master Khan i wouldnt agree with that, look man we might have ethnic and sectarian problems but ask any of Imran's supporters if they know where he is from and whether it matters to them.. chances are they wouldnt..they would probably assume that he is from KP..Having Khan as a last name or being pashtun in my opinion is not a barrier in becoming head of state in Pakistan
We have pashtuns who have headed the Army, ISI, FIA, IB, Parliament..heck Pakistan had a "Hindu" Chief of Justice just a couple of years back..Imagine that a non-muslim as the Chief Justice of an Islamic Republic
I'd urge you guys to be positive about this, we have to move beyond our individual differences and apprehensions
It's enough that I know, Our time had a home, In your heart..Was a place..But the glass always breaks..
Ya most of our prime ministers and presidents would be punjabis but remember Ghulam ishaq khan was a Pashtun , beside a pashtun army chief can declare marshal law and can become a dictator. You are clearly differentiating between pakis and pashtuns. I think you are one of those afghan wannabes of UK who thinks that a pashtun can not be a pakistani.
Luffy jana lega sara khora ya chartha pe yakhoo oobo welamba.
da ar zaley Afghan sela pekey manz ta ra achay?
Sta tolo afghaniano taika akhiste ka cho? Ka afghanino baba-e-qaum ye?...za master khan sara lagay wama, manz che ma ar zghala.
goro luppy
te pe pakistan aw india yakdaweloo bandey khe ekhkarey.
aw ma de tol AFghanano (not afghaniano) teka aghestey da no bel zaley guzara sharmawa.
te master khan sara lagay wey aw ka master ali haider sara no afghanistan pe key me ra gadawa.
Actually I did'nt mention Afghans...i spoke of Afghan wannabes of UK from KP...
By the way what so special about Afghans? My observation says that those who call themeselves afghans rather than Pashtuns, are mostly persianized pashtuns.
A party with three perfect words and a proper noun.
“Imran khan”, “Change” and “Youth”. Anyone can be attracted and fascinated by these three beguiling words.
Imran khan: Who is he? A well-known cricketer, the one who brought world cup to the country in 1992, a proud moment for Pakistan. A very good philanthropist, made SKMT with the help of people of Pakistan and the then Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif gave the land of SKMT tax free to him, for a noble cause.
Change: What change is required by us at present? We all are so desperate for “change” but what kind of “change” and through which channel and tool? To be very honest we don’t know exactly what kind of change we want, but the crux is we want “change”, no matter at what cost and where our desperation of “ change “would lead us. We are not concerned with it.
Youth: who are they? Engaging and involving youth is no doubt a very good initiative. What kind of Youth? Youth which have no sense of direction, no vision, who are ignorant, aggressive, intolerant and do not hesitate or don’t even think once before disrespecting their fellow citizens, senior citizens on the basis of political affiliation. Can we bring “change” from this kind of youth on board?
He is Imran khan “the Imran Khan”
He talks about change “the change”
He talks about “youth” about “us”
Having all the appealing ingredients to attract but still I left PTI. Reason being, I believe it is always better to give another chance to something which you have tried before, only when you can visibly see the difference between the tried and the untried. The new ride which you are trying to go for is not the one which is required by you.
Having a bad toothache, so I thought of trying some new toothpaste (change is what I need). As I was carried away by the advertisement and the hype created by it. The fancy packet was appealing too. I was about to purchase it but before doing that I just go through the ingredients on the back of it. And I failed to find a single useful ingredient that will solve my tooth problem. So I realized that I should stick to my old toothpaste at least it has the required ingredients may be I am not using it properly or maybe I just over looked “the new and improved” version of it in my desperation of “change” and in my eagerness of trying something new.
That day I realized, Imran khan’s speeches and talks are marvelous and can appeal to anyone for the time being. His charismatic personality no doubt leaves an impact. But on reality grounds his policies lack practical approach to the core issues. He talked about insignificant issues and without any concrete solutions. Mobilizing and gathering people on a platform does not prove any one as a successful leader. Even Shahruk khan can gather an immense crowd but this doesn’t make him a leader. It is always the vision and practical approach to the national issues and international issues that can motivate people for a change. Identification of issues and problems is not what we require today. We all know what our problems are. Talking about larger than life and reality will always have an adverse effect as they lack practical implementation.
Trying something new is good only when it is useful and when it makes sense otherwise you will end up in more mess.
Master khana imran khan is a patriotic "paki" and you have stated numerous times that you hate "paki" and "pakiland.
Imran Khan's foreign policy has one central aim at first, and that is to end the support for the US war and occupation of Afghanistan and he wants them to withdraw from Afghanistan and the rest of the region.
This directly ties to Pakistan domestic policy. He does not want US aid to enslave the nation, and wants to downgrade the ties to just simple diplomatic ones.
The main reason people support him though is to end the support for US war and occupation of Afghanistan. Majority of the people did not and do not want to support this US war and occupation of Afghanistan. He is heeding the peoples demands.
His foreign policy objectives in ending the US war and occupation and demanding they leave Afghanistan and the region is in line with the interests of the Afghan people as well as China, Iran, and Russia. It appears a new block has formed that appears to be on the same page on almost everything, now.
Hence, he taps into regional resentment to the continuation of this inhumane and immoral war.
This then is why Master Khan supports him. It doesn't mean one has to be pro-Pakistan, it only means one has to be in favor of ending this US war and occupation of Afghanistan.
Comment