-
-
How is Imran Khan, an alcoholic womanizer any different than Farhat Taj who putridly spread her legs for a farangi?
Toramana you're very irrational and confused ; you argue that we cannot evaluate Farhat Taj by her life decisions but we can evaluate Imran Khan?
Granted I agree with your critique of Imran Khan, but you're clearly not even handed and show slanted arguments.Comment
-
I fail to see how Farhat Taj letting a farangi have sex with her and a Hezak dancing in a rally
represents "Saintly" character ....Imran Khan is dirt bag, but so are people like you Toramana, you're just two dirt bags who are at war with each other.Comment
-
Toramana
Please give me evidence and facts explaining your opposition to Imran Khan's objectives to end the US war and occupation. Do you think war in Afghanistan is good?
I want to see your facts
I could care less if Najib was brought out of the grave and ran for an election. If his objectives were to end wars and occupation, it would be sensible to say that is rightComment
-
Bring any evidence before labelling these allegations.Originally posted by ScimitarXEdge View PostComment
-
Toramana
Are you opposed to ending Pak support for US war and occupation of Afghanistan?
Are you opposed to ending foreign meddling in the region that started in 1953?Comment
-
Mingora swat ANP celebrate - YouTubeOriginally posted by Toramana View Post
isn't that a transvestite??????Comment
-
Imran Khan's house spread over 400 kanals
The same person and their Paki Panjo followers criticise Asfandiyar Wali, Afrasiab Khattak, Achakzai, etc. who live in mud-houses in Charssada and Peshawar.
Imran Khan's House Exposed - YouTubeComment
-
Below is a glimpse as who is Daphne Barak. Had this woman interviewed Asfandiyar or Achakzai, the entire Punjo media would have declared them agents of Israel.
DAPHNE BARAK’S CAREER PORTFOLIO. Will there be any questions NOW?
July 7, 2011
tags: Aaron Carter, Ami Winehouse, Azif Zardari, Benazir Bhutto, Daphne Barak, Dieter Wiesner, Grace Rwaramba, Joseph Jackson, Katherine Jackson, Kit Culkin, Macaulay Culkin, Mallika Chopra, Michael Jackson, Roger Friedman, Sanam Bhutto
by vindicatemj
Many wonder why I ask to be patient with the Aaron Carter situation and what we should have done instead. I think we should have investigated Daphne Barak first. I am not ready to pass any judgment on Carter at the moment as it is still too early to conclude what he really said, whether he meant Michael Jackson at all (at least in part 2 where he didn’t give any names) and under what circumstances his conversation with Daphne Barak took place.
In all his earlier interviews Aaron firmly stood by Michael’s side and I am not ready to shrug it off as a mere nothing. Daphne, on the other hand, has a long history of harassment of Michael Jackson – only this harassment took place in such a sly manner that even the good and well-meaning mother of Michael Jackson’s didn’t notice any malice on Daphne’s part and willingly gave her interviews.
You can always recongnize the vultures by the way they smile
I see Daphne Barak as an extremely ugly species of a tabloid viper. She is as vicious as Diane Dimond and Martin Bashir but is not as straightforward as they are – surprisingly, she poses herself as a “friend” of the Jackson family and does indeed have access to them. Michael’s parents evidently considered her trustworthy enough to give her several interviews (which means that they should be satisfied with her work), and there was even a time when Daphne, Joseph and Randy Jackson found themselves in a business project together. This points to her being considered an insider of the Jacksons’ family and someone who is trusted – at least by Michael’s parents.
This is a terrible mistake and misconception on their part of course, which is all the more harmful as it misleads other people as to Daphne’s real intentions regarding Michael Jackson. People assume that if Michael’s parents are friends with her, they can also rely on her being a friend.
Grace Rwaramba, for example, didn’t give interviews to anyone for 17 (!) years and the only person she chose to speak to was Daphne Barak. Why would a reserved and cautious woman like Grace do such a reckless thing? Only because she thought Daphne to be friendly and trustworthy enough to listen to some of her observations on why she no longer worked for the Jacksons. However you do remember what came out of that trust, don’t you?
The same could have happened to Aaron Carter. With someone else he wouldn’t have tolerated insistent questions about whether he ever saw Michael take any drugs (he said that he didn’t) but with a well-meaning Jacksons’ “friend” he didn’t regard such speculations suspicious – especially since it was a casual talk between the two of them. How many of us also babble our tongues with friends, discussing, for instance, the various versions of Michael’s death? And would it be normal for a “friend” to secretly record you and sell the tape to tabloids (as Daphne Barak did) especially after tampering with the tape and twisting your words into their opposite through heavy editing?
Thinking that you are talking to a friend when in fact you are not is an extremely dangerous thing because you lose your usual vigilance and open yourself to all sorts of provocations. From Daphne Barak’s cut-and-paste videos it looks like she is quite capable of framing up people, so learning about her ways is absolutely crucial for correct interpretation of the Carter situation – same as knowing Bashir’s cannibal nature is crucial for learning how and why he used Michael’s exceptional honesty and trust for his own cannibal ends.
I have scraped some information on Daphne Barak and must tell you at once that she produces a very contrasting impression. Her secret is that on the face of it she sounds very sincere and genuine, but when her true nature is accidentally uncovered you are shocked to see how malicious she is, how criminal her ways of obtaining information are and how big and shameless is her desire to falsify facts in order to get the best price.
If you don’t know the way she is operating her sophisticated lies may very well go unnoticed, but if you do, all of it is seen in a different light. This is why Roger Friedman who knows all the tricks of their trade calls her nothing less than a “vulture-like celebrity interviewer” and even “a blood-sucking vampire”.
Wiki introduces Dapne Barak as- “an Israeli-American interviewer whose subjects have included film and music celebrities, royalty, world leaders, and international personalities”.
http://vindicatemj.wordpress.com/201...questions-now/Comment
-
And now at this...Typical Punjabi cunningness/duplicity---Now this buffoon is calling himself a Mahajar ---When he is in Pukhtunkhwa, he calls himself Pashtun ---
http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=tJZ41BTW9PUComment
-
This is Dephne Barak sister of Yahood Barak---and "friend" of Imran Khan---The more I think about this person the more he seems to me implanted by Jews.Comment
-
^Slow down Toramana. There's no need to spam your own threads with youtube videos.
Just think about it - once you start saying that Imran Khan has been installed by Jews and you openly look down upon his Indofication by calling him anti-Hindu/Sikh names, it comes across as the reaction of someone who has fallen right back into a trap that is often associated with nervous Pakistan supremacy advocates.
Long story short; you've made your point, but perhaps you miss the point about crafting a mature, believable argument.
Comment
Tweet
Comment