Originally posted by Soldat_Amir
View Post
By the way, regarding being related to Karzai, the Pope, a doctor, a lawyer, or two Mahsud reporters... that doesnt give evidence or weight to your claim.
Its like my relative saying: Look dude, we are related to a heart doctor so if we say drink mud 3 times a day to treat your heart attack, well then its gotta be right.
And in regard to the western sources, just because you cannot debunk Pape and his methodology or take on scheuer's open source data doesnt deligitimize them. In fact it make them more legitimate. What does Robert Pape have to gain if the war ends or continues? If it ends and the Afghan war stops then he actually suffers.
The other issue is FT ANDERSEN's continued claim that no, i repeat 0% of the deaths from drone attacks are civilian. As the BBC reference shows, that is just not true.
On our side of the border, this has been definitively disproven to the embarassment of the Afghan government and General Peteraus:
"Attending that jirga, however, were Clive Stafford Smith and Tara Murray, two US lawyers who trained at Columbia and Harvard. They tell me, unequivocally, that US law is based on the fact that every person is innocent until proven guilty. Why was Tariq, even if a terrorist suspect, not offered an opportunity to defend himself?
Let me offer an important alternative argument - the US government has a record of making terrible mistakes in this covert war. On 2 September 2010, the International Security Assistance Force in Afghanistan claimed to have killed Muhammad Amin, the alleged Taliban deputy governor of Takhar province in Afghanistan, in a drone strike. There was only one problem: Michael Semple, a Taliban expert at Harvard University, subsequently interviewed Muhammad Amin and confirmed that he was alive and well and living in Pakistan in March 2011.
The man who was killed was Zabet Amanullah, who was out campaigning in parliamentary elections - along with nine of his fellow election workers. This was confirmed by exhaustive research conducted by Kate Clark, a former BBC correspondent in Kabul who now works for the Afghanistan Analysts Network, who had met with Zabet Amanullah in 2008. The error could have been avoided, Clark points out in her report, if US military intelligence officers had just been "watching election coverage on television", instead of living in its "parallel world" remote from "normal, everyday world of Afghan politics".
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mobile...n_1086622.html
Sorry Maseed, you lose again. And next time you send that Skank Andersen a video, and next time she is dumb enough to claim a 100% accuracy rate for the drones, be sure to have her sign on with her anglocized surnamed.



Comment