Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ashraf Ghani- a failed traitor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    [QUOTE=Shayesta;470121]
    Pretty much every Afghan that goes back to 'rebuild' Afghanistan is going through Western organisations
    Provide me your evidence. Qatar has been heavily involved in helping Afghan refugees. The few American organization that are helping are neutral, and not tied to the American military, but this again remains doubtful. It has been recently found that even these so-called helpers are siphoning money through NGOs. Unlike you, I provide evidence.
    http://outlookafghanistan.net/topics.php?post_id=932
    but that doesn't mean they are going with the thought of supporting the ongoing war.
    Again show me your evidence. The only Afghans I see going "to help" Afghans are the translators who assist in night raids. Thats not help, WHAT it IS is supporting the war against the Afghan people
    After years of war there is finally an opportunity to do something for Afghanistan, just because the war is endless and the foreign presence isn't disappearing
    They will leave like the Soviets before them. Constant requests for talks should be a strong indicator to you, and Kabul "governments' anti-West stances should give you a perspective of where this is heading.
    doesn't mean one should sit idle and wait until it all sorts out by itself. Because it doesn't work that way.
    OK
    My point is that just like Ghani, even those Afghans from West who help the country wouldn't hand over their Western nationality. But that doesn't mean they become traitors, along with their country's interest they are also taking into consideration their own future interest. Nothing wrong with that, really.
    Show me your evidence. You are detracting from my original post again, and you just throw words around.


    Aren't the Northern Alliance supporting war on Taliban which goes at the cost of Afghan lives?
    Aren't the Taliban supporting war on NA/NATO which goes at cost of Afghan lives?
    The common perception on the ground in Afghanistan is that the USNATO presence is the primary reason Afghans fight. The view is that their presence is solely responsible for the civilians deaths outside of night raids and airstrikes.
    These two parties aren't weakening each other; They are only taking our civilians' lives. Those 'secular Afghans' (whoever they are) might have supported wars, but those in have Afghanistan have in fact participated in them.
    Again, the USNATO presence which has killed thousands of Afghans in night raids and airstrikes is solely responsible for even these other Afghan deaths. According to a recent New York Times article, this is how Afghans see it. You seem to blame Afghans for everything.


    Afghanistan isn't just limited to Southern Afghanistan.
    There is also Eastern Afghanistan you forgot to mention.
    Go and ask the Northerners whether they prefer the current government or the Taliban regime?
    First of all, Sharia rule is required for all Muslims. To deny this would be to deny Islam. However, to address your point, the opposition to foreign presence has spread to the North, and to say it is solely Pashtun is ridiculous (thinking what you are going to say).Taliban's reach spreading north | The Journal Gazette | Fort Wayne, IN I can provide more articles if you would like.
    The recent increased tensions in Kabul regarding Taliban should actually tell you enough, and if not then the increased tensions amongst Hazaras should.
    Again, Afghanistan will always be under Sharia rule. You bring up a irrelevant point.


    Go and witness those number of mansions owned per political-tie in Kabul only, forget about those in Nangarhar, Mazar and Herat. Witness those thousands of 'engineers' who have bagged hundreds of thousands of Dollars in name of 'constructions', and guess where the money ends up landing? Not to forget the ridiculous amount of money they got for construction of Kabul Airport, which in real isn't even worth a hundred Dollars. And by the way, take a closer look at your own provided source.
    Oh I have. I can show you more sources. You on the other hand have provided nothing to back up your claims. Your claims about two Afghan-American women helping orphans in Kandahar, you did not substantiate. First of all, you are comparing two Muslimahs to Ashraf Ghani. This is not necessary. Most of the organizations that are truly helping Afghanistan are not tied to any military. You have the Red Cross and the Red Crescent operating in Afghanistan. They are not tied to the Americans. The organizations that are tied to the Americans are part of the propaganda campaign, and in fact have been found to be siphoning money out of Afghanistan- money meant for Afghan people. Its all one BIG SCAM.

    America is not doing anything for Afghan people, except waging a failed war of aggression, something that has resulted in their defeat by their own admission.




    My point is that like Ghani even these Muslimahs also came to help Afghanistan through American support
    Show me your evidence. There are American organizations that are not tied to the military. What do you mean by American support? Military support? There are a few American organizations that are neutral, and there are those that assist the US military in propaganda too. I don't understand what you mean by American. For a fact,Ashraf Ghani is in Afghanistan due to American war machine, not out of humanitarian concern for Afghan people. Again, it is not even prevalent because most Afghans will not assist foreigners in this war due to honor.
    , and requested Afghans in West to join American organisations in rebuilding Afghanistan
    The "help" Americans requested has mostly been with translation. These translators assist in the night raids, and get paid BIG MONEY for doing it. They are only helping themselves, and making haraam money. Tell me otherwise.
    They are also afraid of Taliban and spoke against the Taliban, but does that discredit the support they have provided the homeless, orphaned and widows?
    You are again going off on a tangent. If there are Afghans who are helping other Afghans, then who is objecting. However, Afghans who are tied to the foreign occupation are part of the occupation too. Thats just common sense. The prevalent feeling on the ground is very anti-foreign.


    How do you know he is supporting war against Afghanistan? What war are you talking about by the way?; Those against the Taliban, or those against the civilians?
    You can google his name, statements, and actions. This war was started in October 2001. Did Afghans invade America? I don't recall this eer happening. What are you even talking about?
    Because people I see suffering are the civilians, thanks to both the foreigners and our own Afghan 'elements'
    Read below. See who the civilians are blaming. The prevalent mood in Kabul is that the foreigners are to blame. This feeling is mostly everywhere in Afghanistan. Didn't the Mazar and Takhar protests tell you anything? Afghans are opposed to the foreign presence.

    "Fruit vendors in the city’s relatively safe downtown and students at universities struck a similar tone and added a frequently heard argument: If the Americans leave, then the Taliban will no longer have an excuse to wage war.
    “During the Taliban regime there were no suicide attacks, but since these people have shown up in our country, we have faced lots of adversity,” said Nasrullah, a shopkeeper in Kabul’s dilapidated downtown, who like many Afghans uses only one name. “When they leave Afghanistan, the Taliban will stop fighting; it is only because of these foreigners they are fighting.”

    Last edited by Guest; 07-03-2011, 02:11 AM.

    Comment


    • #32
      What Shayesta is trying to say is that Afghans should have never implemented the Shariah. Because they chose to have Shariah they were invaded. And therefore it is our own fault. So we should accept invasion and puppets as rulers.
      [SIZE="4"][B][CENTER][URL="www.quranawsunnat.com"]www.quranawsunnat.com
      [/URL]
      [URL="www.youtube.com/Sangartube"]www.youtube.com/Sangartube
      [/URL][/SIZE]
      Mullah 4 Life! [/CENTER][/B]

      Comment


      • #33
        Originally posted by شمله ور خراساني View Post
        What Shayesta is trying to say is that Afghans should have never implemented the Shariah. Because they chose to have Shariah they were invaded. And therefore it is our own fault. So we should accept invasion and puppets as rulers.
        It appears that that is what she is saying.

        Comment


        • #34
          What war are you talking about by the way?; Those against the Taliban, or those against the civilians? Because people I see suffering are the civilians, thanks to both the foreigners and our own Afghan 'elements'
          . I am talking about the war against the Afghan people. Read below. See who the civilians are blaming. The prevalent mood in Kabul is that the foreigners are to blame. This feeling is mostly everywhere in Afghanistan. Didn't the Mazar and Takhar protests tell you anything? Afghans are opposed to the foreign presence.

          "Fruit vendors in the city’s relatively safe downtown and students at universities struck a similar tone and added a frequently heard argument: If the Americans leave, then the Taliban will no longer have an excuse to wage war.
          “During the Taliban regime there were no suicide attacks, but since these people have shown up in our country, we have faced lots of adversity,” said Nasrullah, a shopkeeper in Kabul’s dilapidated downtown, who like many Afghans uses only one name. “When they leave Afghanistan, the Taliban will stop fighting; it is only because of these foreigners they are fighting.”

          Last edited by Guest; 07-03-2011, 01:11 AM.

          Comment


          • #35
            why would of there of been suicide attacks during the taliban regime? they weren't fighting a guerrilla war at the time.

            and weren't the taliban fighting a civil war before the foreigners invaded?
            There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

            Sayyid Qutb

            Comment


            • #36
              Your answer is in the National Geographic documentary. I think they were the response to the civil war between Afghans.

              YouTube - ‪How the Taliban came to power‬‏
              Last edited by Guest; 07-03-2011, 01:22 AM.

              Comment


              • #37
                Ghani sb already given up his passport and hold only afghan passport.
                The man is realy talented and did good job for the country.
                He has some good ideas in his mind.A patriotic and pashtunist.
                The reason he is failed cus not being pupet of the west and others.
                good luck afghans with warlords and dump talibs, you do not need good people to rule you.



                Support pashto language and greater pukhtoonkhwa.

                pa prady jaba khabarai pakhtun naka
                be laila bala soda kho majnon naka
                gero jabo kre lahoo pa khpal tahzeeb ki
                be pakhtu ba de bal hestsok rastoon naka
                hamza baba
                پَښتو کښې اُولېکئ
                Pashto Keyboard Online (Afghan) LEXILOGOS >>

                Comment


                • #38
                  the civil war stayed the same, its just the actors that changed.
                  There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                  Sayyid Qutb

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    ashraf ghani is not someone i would like to see lead the afghan nation, though he is bright and should be kept to manage the economy and development of the country.
                    There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.

                    Sayyid Qutb

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Originally posted by شمله ور خراساني View Post
                      I've never been there. You seem to know all about it. I assume you spent quite some time there with sodomist Mullahs in Lahori brothels.
                      You are busy recycling the Pakistani hot-airs in this forum 24/7 and yet you refuse to admit your heritage? All you copy and paste are the same BS preached by cockroaches of Paki establishment…ex Jamyat Islami, Tablighi Jamahat, Taliban and etc…in other word…the same filthy savages that are doing Porkistan bidding in my holy Afghanistan. Allow me to remind you that your communicating to an Afghan who knows your kind too well…You may fool the average Afghans who is blinded by your manipulation of religion sentiments, but you’ll not pass go with me sonny.
                      ای وخته بېرته راشه يو افغان وزېږوه
                      نو بيا يو احمد خان يا ميروس خان وزېږوه

                      چې ننګ په وطن وکړئ داسي ځوان وزېږوه
                      نويا خو خوشحال خان يا بادشا خان وزېږوه

                      سپن اوشن بيرغ د ازادۍ کړي زمونږ پورته
                      بيا داسې يو بادشا لکه امان وزيږوه

                      چې جوړه کړي انګريز ته بيا غزا د ارنوۍ
                      يو داسې لوی غازي ميرزمان خان وزيږوه

                      سرو مال قربان کړي له وطن او له ناموسه
                      په مينه د وطن کي افغانان وزيږوه

                      ټپې د ازادۍ کړه بورا ته په خيالونو
                      اوس راشه په شعرنو کي طوفان وزيږو

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Originally posted by Azmal View Post
                        You are busy recycling the Pakistani hot-airs in this forum 24/7 and yet you refuse to admit your heritage? All you copy and paste are the same BS preached by cockroaches of Paki establishment…ex Jamyat Islami, Tablighi Jamahat, Taliban and etc…in other word…the same filthy savages that are doing Porkistan bidding in my holy Afghanistan. Allow me to remind you that your communicating to an Afghan who knows your kind too well…You may fool the average Afghans who is blinded by your manipulation of religion sentiments, but you’ll not pass go with me sonny.
                        Ah, the true son of Pakistan, as per his descent from a Lahori by Telai (supposedly we might add) is calling others Pakistani. The same son of "Pakistani" who couldnt distinguish between zia and zai and understand something as simple as the concept that the suffix means son of.

                        Hey the Saleh murdaar Harameeyaah, who the hell are you to call anyone savage you piece of trash. You are basically a mouthpiece for that ass clown from Panjshir, Mr. Saleh. Each and every aspect of your rhetoric resembles his. Shall we remind the readers of your pornographic skills? Now you come up with a new script of mullahs and you in a far away madrassah?

                        All of this and all the accusations against his mother when you dont even know who your grandmothers were. Have you located her on the list yet, you know the nonexistent Yusufzai slave that you generated and then insulted the whole Yusufzai tribe with:

                        m. (first) Maryam Begum, Bobo Jahan-i-Qal'a-i-Hazara (d.s.p.), daughter of Sardar Faqir Muhammad Khan, a Barakzai. m. (second) Bibi Walida Jahan (d. March 1915), daughter of Mir Jahandar Shah, Uzbek Mir of Badarkhshan. m. (third) ca. 1865, a daughter of H.H. Amir ul-Muminim Sayyid Amir Muzaffar ud-din 'Abdul Khan Bahadur Sultan, Amir of Bokhara. m. (fourth) 1875, after the birth of her sons, Asal Begum, previously Gulraz Bibi, a former slave-girl from Wakhan and Samarkand. m. (fifth) at Kabul, 22nd November 1880, Bibi Halima, Bobo Jahan-i-Jaghadar Begum (d. at Kabul, 1925), his Chief wife, daughter of Sayyid Mir Atiqu'llah Khan, by his wife, Shams-i-Jahan Begum, eldest daughter of H.H. Amir al-Mumenin, Amir-i-Kabir, Amir Dost Muhammad Khan, Amir of Afghanistan. m. (sixth) before 1882, a daughter of Mir Hakim Khan, Nizam ud-Daula, Mir of Shibarghan. m. (seventh) Safura Begum [Bibi Staro], a Chitrali lady. m. (eighth) Padshah Begum, daughter of a Mazari Sayyid from Balkh. m. (ninth) Bibi Gulraz II, a Kohlabi consort from Gulistani. m. (tenth) Bibi Zahara, a Shighani consort. m. (eleventh) Sajida Begum (d.s.p.), eldest daughter of Mir Muhammad 'Ali Khan Yaftali, of Badakhshan. m. (twelfth) a Kohlabi consort. m. (thirteenth) Bibi Nekadam (d. ca. 1886), a Chitrali consort. m. (thirteenth) a daughter of Muhammad Husain Khan Ming, of Maimana. He d. at Bagh-i-Bala, Kabul, 1st October 1901 (bur. Boston Sarai Mausoleum), having had issue, twelve sons and four daughters:

                        http://www.royalark.net/Afghanistan/barak12.htm

                        and then you got your geography wrong again and accused the noble Safi of supplying a slave for Telai the pervert's pornographic adventures:


                        http://www.royalark.net/Afghanistan/zikria.htm


                        When everyone knows it was a Lahori. Ironic isnt it? Ashamed of your own made up pertend lineage to the point where you castigate the country that you sprang from. And not only that, but you picked a clown named Sultan Muhammad Telai, an incompetent son of a donkey, from which to generate a lineage.

                        Either walk back across the Friendship bridge into your real native country with your gilaam jaam roots or the Afghanistan Tajikistan bridge. Either way, you have no claim to the title Afghan, just trash.
                        "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Originally posted by Shayesta View Post
                          Then what are they waiting for? Highest bid in money? Or better paid jobs?


                          People in West aren't here out love for West, they are here because the situation in Afghanistan wasn't safe enough and nor is it now stable enough for them to leave to Afghanistan permanently. West moreover provides way more opportunities to futures of its citizens and Afghan citizens in West can take full advantage of it and invest their earnings earned in West into poor people of Afghanistan. Those Northern Alliance members were mainly born and bred in Afghanistan who are into politics of Afghanistan, what good have they as Afghan citizens done to Afghanistan? Nothing but looting, rapes and destructions. At least those sincerely wishing to help Afghanistan from West haven't got their hands guilty of innocent blood, or you could perhaps prove otherwise?


                          Even the Taliban is considered foreign puppet and supporters of aggression by many Afghans. Our country politically seen is in a big mess but there is no guarantee of when the war will finish, at least people can try to build something with the money they get flowed into the country. I had seen a documentary a very long time ago about two Afghan women, one a Kandahari and the other Kabuli, both of them American citizens. One of them was building homes for the homeless in Kabul, mainly widows. And the other was fetching Kandahari orphans in an orphanage they built in Kandahar. They didn't throw their passports away to show their patriotism, but while the dirty politics continued they resumed their work of helping the poor and needful ones, and no one else than an Afghan educated and earning in West can do that for Afghanistan.
                          I respect you a lot and see you have good faculty of reasoning, but here my rejoinder to you:

                          1. In the past you have showed that you do not understand basic human responses. For example, in the Najib thread you indicated that the average Afghan was better off not fighting the Russians. That goes against 5000 years of human history. If you put a base in Alabama of Afghans or you put a base of China men in Holland, and the people felt that their government was being either influenced, or their way of life was under attack, or that their religion was at stake, they would take up arms. It happened in Ireland (and continues to), it happened in Iraq (and continues to), and it even happened here in the US. If the current status is that the kalaay waal Pashtun does not even know about 9/11 per surveys, they likely did not know or care why a Russkey was sitting in their backyard with a gun, ready to enforce Leninism.

                          2. The logic behind 1 shows that people generally will oppose foreign incursions into their land. No matter how hard you try, you have not yet produced a picture of a single Pakistani rifleman and tank occupying Kabul or Kandahar. So if they did it deftly through paying the right people and the average kalaay waal saw Mullah Omar as a native ruler, but had no idea he was on Pakistan's pay roll, it matters little, because it is wholley different than an actual infidel occupying force per Islamic and Pashto cultural dictums. A similar response, as was given to the Russians, was seen in the FATA region to the British.

                          3. So with 2 and 3, now you have a situation where people are called to defend their country. If it was the Americans that lured the Russians in, or if Satan himself beckoned them, or if country music super star Kenny Chesney gave them a gilded invite, it matters little to not at all. Why? Because it then became the duty of every able bodied Afghan male to oust the occupier because that is exactly how the masses viewed them. Just as the Americans viewed it as a "you are with us or against us" struggle against AQ, and just as Patrick Henry proclaimed, in the US Revolution: "Give me Liberty of Give me Death!" so too did this automatic defense of the land become obligatory whether you are a secularist Christian like Washington, Jefferson, Henry, etc or if you are an Islamist.

                          In fact the whole of the world supported that struggle. The emigres that ran away to the West, beat their chests proclaiming that they were the might Afghans that ousted the Russian empire and that they were the defeaters of empires. On the contrary, they were not that. These people, Mullah Omar included, were that because they stayed behind and did their duty by their country. Ashraf Ghani, Mr. Karzai, Mr. Daudzai, and a whole host of others, however, ran away and left their people to struggle against the Red Army juggernaut. They are like parasites and in now way resemble the founding fathers of truly independent states like the Washingtons, the Jeffersons, the Simon Bolivars etc. They are installed rulers.

                          4. So now that these failed parasites (failed because like Mr Karzai, most of them could barely wash dishes in the West) decided they would come back to power on the shoulders of an invading empire. They are protected by groups like Dynacorps security and can barely walk beyond the parameters of Kabul without risking their lives. They are hardly any different than Chalabi, Maliki, and a whole host of other Iraqi leaders.

                          5. I have seen it on here that you and others use the canard of peace and security in order to say to those sons of the soil that decided that they would do what Afghans have done since time immemorial, which is to take up the gun against an infidel invader (they did it against Gurgin the Christian and his shiah backers, they did against the Mughals, they did it against The great Khan, they did it against British, and the Russians, and now they are doing it again against the Americans). So it was OK for Patrick Henry and for the Irish or for the others to take up arms... it was OK for the Chinese to oust 7 world powers... but because you like Karzai better... the sons of the soil should just shut up, sit down, and sacrifice a key word that is lost on you... sovereignty... because somehow you have constructed the phantom menance of Pakistan... despite the fact that Omar was a Hotak, despite the fact that Dadullah was a Kakar and so on and so forth. But rather, you would that they slave under Petreus or under Gates? Which zai or zaath or kabaeel is Gates from? Which madhaab or which sect if Petreus from?

                          6. Just as the Americans toiled and sacrificed, and just as General washington lost battle after battle... and they struggled for a decade... sovereignty does not come with laying down your dignity.

                          7. Spare me the response that it is easy to say that from the West. If every Afghan today, within the confines of Afghanistan decided that they would lay down their weapons and that they would embrace Gates as a godhead and Karzai as a Prophet, it would not bother me in the least. However, if the sons of the soil decide they want to fight, as is their right, as was the right of all human beings wanting sovereignty, then it is not my right, in the West, to promise them false comforts that will never come and to force them to lay down their weapons. So my response to this canard is simply: How dare you tell the sons of Afghans that they do not have the right, if they choose to, to fight for their independence of all?
                          Last edited by BarakzaiAbdali; 07-03-2011, 04:04 PM.
                          "2 crackheads don't become any better or stronger by sharing the same crack pipe." - Greatest PF quote

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Originally posted by BarakzaiAbdali View Post
                            I respect you a lot and see you have good faculty of reasoning, but here my rejoinder to you:

                            1. In the past you have showed that you do not understand basic human responses. For example, in the Najib thread you indicated that the average Afghan was better off not fighting the Russians. That goes against 5000 years of human history. If you put a base in Alabama of Afghans or you put a base of China men in Holland, and the people felt that their government was being either influenced, or their way of life was under attack, or that their religion was at stake, they would take up arms. It happened in Ireland (and continues to), it happened in Iraq (and continues to), and it even happened here in the US. If the current status is that the kalaay waal Pashtun does not even know about 9/11 per surveys, they likely did not know or care why a Russkey was sitting in their backyard with a gun, ready to enforce Leninism.

                            2. The logic behind 1 shows that people generally will oppose foreign incursions into their land. No matter how hard you try, you have not yet produced a picture of a single Pakistani rifleman and tank occupying Kabul or Kandahar. So if they did it deftly through paying the right people and the average kalaay waal saw Mullah Omar as a native ruler, but had no idea he was on Pakistan's pay roll, it matters little, because it is wholley different than an actual infidel occupying force per Islamic and Pashto cultural dictums. A similar response, as was given to the Russians, was seen in the FATA region to the British.

                            3. So with 2 and 3, now you have a situation where people are called to defend their country. If it was the Americans that lured the Russians in, or if Satan himself beckoned them, or if country music super star Kenny Chesney gave them a gilded invite, it matters little to not at all. Why? Because it then became the duty of every able bodied Afghan male to oust the occupier because that is exactly how the masses viewed them. Just as the Americans viewed it as a "you are with us or against us" struggle against AQ, and just as Patrick Henry proclaimed, in the US Revolution: "Give me Liberty of Give me Death!" so too did this automatic defense of the land become obligatory whether you are a secularist Christian like Washington, Jefferson, Henry, etc or if you are an Islamist.

                            In fact the whole of the world supported that struggle. The emigres that ran away to the West, beat their chests proclaiming that they were the might Afghans that ousted the Russian empire and that they were the defeaters of empires. On the contrary, they were not that. These people, Mullah Omar included, were that because they stayed behind and did their duty by their country. Ashraf Ghani, Mr. Karzai, Mr. Daudzai, and a whole host of others, however, ran away and left their people to struggle against the Red Army juggernaut. They are like parasites and in now way resemble the founding fathers of truly independent states like the Washingtons, the Jeffersons, the Simon Bolivars etc. They are installed rulers.

                            4. So now that these failed parasites (failed because like Mr Karzai, most of them could barely wash dishes in the West) decided they would come back to power on the shoulders of an invading empire. They are protected by groups like Dynacorps security and can barely walk beyond the parameters of Kabul without risking their lives. They are hardly any different than Chalabi, Maliki, and a whole host of other Iraqi leaders.

                            5. I have seen it on here that you and others use the canard of peace and security in order to say to those sons of the soil that decided that they would do what Afghans have done since time immemorial, which is to take up the gun against an infidel invader (they did it against Gurgin the Christian and his shiah backers, they did against the Mughals, they did it against The great Khan, they did it against British, and the Russians, and now they are doing it again against the Americans). So it was OK for Patrick Henry and for the Irish or for the others to take up arms... it was OK for the Chinese to oust 7 world powers... but because you like Karzai better... the sons of the soil should just shut up, sit down, and sacrifice a key word that is lost on you... sovereignty... because somehow you have constructed the phantom menance of Pakistan... despite the fact that Omar was a Hotak, despite the fact that Dadullah was a Kakar and so on and so forth. But rather, you would that they slave under Petreus or under Gates? Which zai or zaath or kabaeel is Gates from? Which madhaab or which sect if Petreus from?

                            6. Just as the Americans toiled and sacrificed, and just as General washington lost battle after battle... and they struggled for a decade... sovereignty does not come with laying down your dignity.

                            7. Spare me the response that it is easy to say that from the West. If every Afghan today, within the confines of Afghanistan decided that they would lay down their weapons and that they would embrace Gates as a godhead and Karzai as a Prophet, it would not bother me in the least. However, if the sons of the soil decide they want to fight, as is their right, as was the right of all human beings wanting sovereignty, then it is not my right, in the West, to promise them false comforts that will never come and to force them to lay down their weapons. So my response to this canard is simply: How dare you tell the sons of Afghans that they do not have the right, if they choose to, to fight for their independence of all?
                            Well said, the only thing I would add is that this war was not possible without Pakistan. 90% of the supply routes to USNATO have been through Pakistan. They are a menace to Afghanistan, but not in the exact way that Shayesta thinks.

                            Without Pakistan's support, the USNATO war against Afghanistan is not possible.

                            Comment

                            Working...
                            X