The Hypocrisy

[wasil]

Osama was the killer of Pashtuns, US Air jets were bombing on innocents in Kandahar, Helmand and Wazirestan to find him.....But he was Enjoying his life with his wives and children in Pakistan!!!!
In his last statements he called the muslim Ummah to do jihad, but persuades his own son just to be a good muslim, not calling him for jihad!!!!
And still some people stand on himm, i ask why??

[ScimitarXEdge]

Osama was the killer of Pashtuns, US Air jets were bombing on innocents in Kandahar, Helmand and Wazirestan to find him.....But he was Enjoying his life with his wives and children in Pakistan!!!!
In his last statements he called the muslim Ummah to do jihad, but persuades his own son just to be a good muslim, not calling him for jihad!!!!
And still some people stand on himm, i ask why??

That would technically make U.S. Killers of Pashtuns

Why is it Bin Laden is blamed for killing of the Americans when Americans had a choice not to?

[ghundal]

wasil,

the reason they bombed Afghanistan was because Afghans refused to sign an agreement with them on UNOCAL oil.
Its still was rejected, and the current paper is meaningless.

Afghans signed a deal with Argentina back then.

This is the reason.

[BarakzaiAbdali]

Osama was the killer of Pashtuns, US Air jets were bombing on innocents in Kandahar, Helmand and Wazirestan to find him.....But he was Enjoying his life with his wives and children in Pakistan!!!!
In his last statements he called the muslim Ummah to do jihad, but persuades his own son just to be a good muslim, not calling him for jihad!!!!
And still some people stand on himm, i ask why??

Proof Wasil, proof, not propaganda. Once you got some answers to this, come back. Regarding calling his son, you are referring to the supposed will he released. No proof of its authenticity. Per Najwa Bin Ladin's and Omar Bin Ladin's book they ran away exactly beacuse he wanted to send Omar to the front lines:

Hmmm, you haven't yet commented on how

A) Your mansion claims have been debunked:

http://english.aljazeera.net/video/a...301766561.html

Central Intelligence itself has recognized the tenacity and the patience of this fighter:


"However, Bin Laden was so adept at hiding that the CIA admit to admiring his commitment, having rejected the suspicious-looking trappings of bodyguards and vehicles.

According to Pakistan security officials, the al Qaeda leader spent
The claims were made by the terrorist leader's wife, who apparently told interrogators that she and her husband had not left the same room for the past half a decade

'You’ve got to give him credit for his tradecraft,' a former senior CIA official who played a leading role in the manhunt told The Washington Post."

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...nd-MONTHS.html


From the Gaurdian of London:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2011/may/05/bin-laden-death-family-compound

"Pakistani security officials arriving at the scene after the US raid found a spartan house."



B) Your commentary of him not seeing the front lines of actions in the past are historicaly innacurate per Scheuer's biographies as well as Bergen's. At this juncture he was, as those videos show, an operation leader of the whole movement.

C) Regarding Afghans being happy, you have to comment on this (which is actual footage versus Toramana's Tarhat Taj ANDERSEN propaganda pieces that allude to some random tribesmen somewhere that met her in the dark of night:

http://english.aljazeera.net/video/a...315358960.html

D) How does one cede the moral imperitive to the US when their Harem consists of Britney Spears, Faith Hill, etc visiting their bases to rile them up... We already knew from Paul Refsdahl's stunning documentary that front line Taliban fighters kept their wives and children with them and even involved them in the struggle. To you perhaps, you can propagandize this into making it seem as if they were getting sexual satisifaction instead of fighting a war.

However, to the rest of the public and those who are emotionally invested in this, they laugh at your attempts to morally reconcile this with consensual marital sex:

"Women in the U.S. military are more likely to be raped by fellow soldiers than killed by enemy fire. I know what you're thinking - it sounds too unbelievable to be true. But it's not.

The Department of Defense estimates that more than 19,000 service members were raped or sexually assaulted in 2010. Due to a military culture heavy on retaliation and light on prosecution, only 13.5 percent of the victims report the rape."

found here:
http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/articl...INS91J05RF.DTL