The anti-pashtun marwats khans

[graveyardofempires]

Gentleman, may I ask you what makes you upset with Pakistan? If you have had a bad experience at a personal level while I guess you were in Pakistan as a refugee, then I can sympathize with you, though generally the refugees here in Pakistan were treated well. They are still living a comfortable life in posh sector of F-10 in Islamabad, and having good businesses in G-9/4 (Peshawar More). Slavery and oppressions are your own imaginations, utterly devoid of facts. We are first Pakistani and then Pashtuns. By the way, only the moderator has the right to tell us that this forum is exclusively meant for Afghans, and if he does I assure you that this will be my last post to this forum. Once again, I request you to be polite and decent.

listen you ignporant potato

my problem with pakistan starts from the time of Ahmad shah abdali where ancesters of jinah allied themselves with hindus against muslim Afghans and than at the time of ranjeeth singh they allied themselves with sikh against muslim Afghans and at the time of british they were the running dogs who attacked along the british Afghanstan and got their jaws broken.Later they conspired with british to steal Afghan land Pukhtunkhwa and make it part of this seculer state created by kafirs such as jinah.
now my problem with them is that they are occupying my lands and are killing people in swat waziristan bajaur momand etc.

who says they treated refugees good?
you are either blind or willingly trying enforce ignorance upon us.

in pakistan Afghan refugees are to carry special ids in their own lands (pukhtunkhwa) andf the police is out hunting for them daily taking bribe from them ,from poorest.
yes i had personal experience with these reshwatkhors and munafiqs and they also took bribe from females and the paki women also take bribe.

so there you go


and About Pashtunforums
well it is a fact that we afghans own the term Pashtun ,Paki Pashtun is an oxymoron term which will never be accepted and pakistan has ntohing to do with Pashtuns,maybe you can call yourself phatan.

[Albani_Rahmat_Kabulzada]

listen you ignporant potato

my problem with pakistan starts from the time of Ahmad shah abdali where ancesters of jinah allied themselves with hindus against muslim Afghans and than at the time of ranjeeth singh they allied themselves with sikh against muslim Afghans and at the time of british they were the running dogs who attacked along the british Afghanstan and got their jaws broken.Later they conspired with british to steal Afghan land Pukhtunkhwa and make it part of this seculer state created by kafirs such as jinah.
now my problem with them is that they are occupying my lands and are killing people in swat waziristan bajaur momand etc.

who says they treated refugees good?
you are either blind or willingly trying enforce ignorance upon us.

in pakistan Afghan refugees are to carry special ids in their own lands (pukhtunkhwa) andf the police is out hunting for them daily taking bribe from them ,from poorest.
yes i had personal experience with these reshwatkhors and munafiqs and they also took bribe from females and the paki women also take bribe.

so there you go


and About Pashtunforums
well it is a fact that we afghans own the term Pashtun ,Paki Pashtun is an oxymoron term which will never be accepted and pakistan has ntohing to do with Pashtuns,maybe you can call yourself phatan.

You are not aware of history. Ahmad Shah Abdali was an imperator. He killed Muslims and non-Muslims when he marched toward Dehli. He killed many non-Muslims and gave their wmen and daughters to his soldiers. Even the mother of Timur was an Indian slave of one of his Qazalbash generals. If someone attack you and your best and close friend can be at this moment only a non-Muslim, wouldn´t you join him to defend your home, women, daughters and lands? Ahmad Shah Abdali was a warrior and not a saint. He had no natural enemies. By attacking India he caused Muslims and non-Muslims hating eachother till today.

[khalidmehmood]

listen you ignporant potato

my problem with pakistan starts from the time of Ahmad shah abdali where ancesters of jinah allied themselves with hindus against muslim Afghans and than at the time of ranjeeth singh they allied themselves with sikh against muslim Afghans and at the time of british they were the running dogs who attacked along the british Afghanstan and got their jaws broken.Later they conspired with british to steal Afghan land Pukhtunkhwa and make it part of this seculer state created by kafirs such as jinah.
now my problem with them is that they are occupying my lands and are killing people in swat waziristan bajaur momand etc.

who says they treated refugees good?
you are either blind or willingly trying enforce ignorance upon us.

in pakistan Afghan refugees are to carry special ids in their own lands (pukhtunkhwa) andf the police is out hunting for them daily taking bribe from them ,from poorest.
yes i had personal experience with these reshwatkhors and munafiqs and they also took bribe from females and the paki women also take bribe.

so there you go


and About Pashtunforums
well it is a fact that we afghans own the term Pashtun ,Paki Pashtun is an oxymoron term which will never be accepted and pakistan has ntohing to do with Pashtuns,maybe you can call yourself phatan.

Your post speaks volumes about how you were raised, and your knowledge of history. I will be insulting myself if I go to your level of indecency. Earlier, it was just a guess but now I am convinced that you have had a bad experience in Pakistan. If a bad Pakistani cop has molested you, I sympathize with you, but you should not curse the whole lot in retaliation, nor you should try to twist history to settle your score.

[BLS_1919v2.0]

^^What would be the right version of history Khalid?

[graveyardofempires]

You are not aware of history. Ahmad Shah Abdali was an imperator. He killed Muslims and non-Muslims when he marched toward Dehli. He killed many non-Muslims and gave their wmen and daughters to his soldiers. Even the mother of Timur was an Indian slave of one of his Qazalbash generals. If someone attack you and your best and close friend can be at this moment only a non-Muslim, wouldn´t you join him to defend your home, women, daughters and lands? Ahmad Shah Abdali was a warrior and not a saint. He had no natural enemies. By attacking India he caused Muslims and non-Muslims hating eachother till today.

all of your posts are full of **** and based on your personal fantasies combined with propaganda.

[graveyardofempires]

^^What would be the right version of history Khalid?

the right version according to him will eb that khushal khan khattak was a paki.

[Michin Khel]

the right version according to him will eb that khushal khan khattak was a paki.

Descendants of khushal khan khattak and his qaum are today strongely pro-pakistanis

[graveyardofempires]

^
your point is ?

[BLS_1919v2.0]

^^So? Even in Khushal's time, many Pashtuns were pro-Mughal.

[graveyardofempires]

^
and we know what khushal khan khattak said about them.

[Albani_Rahmat_Kabulzada]

all of your posts are full of **** and based on your personal fantasies combined with propaganda.

Didn´t Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked India 7 to 9 times? Didn´t he insulted the Indians by making out of their temples the temples of Indian blood? Go educate yourself or ask someone who have more knowledge about history.

[graveyardofempires]

Didn´t Ahmad Shah Abdali attacked India 7 to 9 times? Didn´t he insulted the Indians by making out of their temples the temples of Indian blood? Go educate yourself or ask someone who have more knowledge about history.

educated according to you is believing in lies and propaganda.
i know my history very well and dont need some anti Pashtun punk such as you to tell me.
take your false version somewhere else.

[Albani_Rahmat_Kabulzada]

educated according to you is believing in lies and propaganda.
i know my history very well and dont need some anti Pashtun punk such as you to tell me.
take your false version somewhere else.

So Ahmad Khan Abdali could go through hundred of villages and hundred of local powers without killing them? Have you read Ghobar´s book Afghanistan Dar Masir e Tarikh? Why should facts be anti-Pashtuns? Ahmad Khan Abdali was a warrior, a soldier.

[khalidmehmood]

^^What would be the right version of history Khalid?

My problem is not with history, it is a past now, and it cannot wipe out Pakistan. My problem is with the kind of attitude that graveyardofempires has. What makes him think that he can call names such as potato, ignorant, slaveboy. As a moderator, you should be the one asking him to behave decently. I do not accept if he says with this attitude that "Allah is One", let alone this history thing. Hope you understand that his style is very irritating. Look at all his posts and you will understand where he belongs. Bottomline of all his posts is that he says that you have to be indecent if you are Pashtun. I encourage you to make this place a good forum for Pashtuns to have good discussions in a decent atmosphere. This gentleman is bent upon discouraging decency.

[graveyardofempires]

^
there should be clear difference between pashtuns and paki loving phatans.

if you bring your paki propaganda here than expect reaction.

dont even talk about pashtuns cuz you are anti pashtuns who supports paki agression