Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

PTI’s road blockade attracts veiled complaints from Afghan officials

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • PTI’s road blockade attracts veiled complaints from Afghan officials

    PTI?s road blockade attracts veiled complaints from Afghan officials - DAWN.COM

    PESHAWAR: A Pakistani trade delegation’s talks with Afghan counterparts and senior functionaries were overshadowed by veiled complaints from the hosts about the ‘unpredictability’ of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa’s land route due to protests and insecurity.

    Trade delegates, who just returned after a three-day visit to Kabul, told Dawn that Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf’s road blockade at Peshawar had added salt to injury for Pakistan’s trade with Afghanistan, making Afghans to go for other options to fulfill their import needs.

    “They told us in plain words that Pakistan is no more their first option for bilateral and transit trades,” said Zahidullah Shinwari, president of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chamber of Commerce and Industry.

    A delegation of the Pakistan-Afghanistan Joint Chamber of Commerce and Industry, involving 21 businessmen and professionals from Karachi, Peshawar and other cities, undertook a three-day visit to Afghanistan from December 23.

    Ziaul Haq Sarhadi, a director of the joint chamber, said Afghan businessmen and officials expressed displeasure over the ongoing road blockade at Peshawar.

    “They complained that the road blockade in the name of stopping supplies to North Atlantic Treaty Organisation has proved a last nail for the normal trade, adding to their costs of doing business with or via Pakistan,” said Mr Sarhadi.

    The echoes of complaints about obstacles to normal trade because of the blockade made rounds during the delegation’s meetings with Afghans during the visit, according to delegates.

    “We were not feeling comfortable about easing restrictions on trade with Pakistan because of troubles at home,” said Mr Shinwari when asked about the level of confidence with which they raised their issues with Afghan authorities in the face of PTI’s ongoing road blockade against drone strikes since Nov 23.

    He said the road protests had done more harm than good to strengthen trade ties between the two countries.

    According to Mr Sarhadi, the delegation, led by the chamber’s co-chairman Zubair Motiwaala from Karachi, held meetings with senior Afghan functionaries, including the country’s vice-president Ustad Mohammad Karim Khalili, commerce minister Kargar, deputy commerce minister Muzzamal Shinwari, customs director Gul Bacha, and private businessmen.

    The delegation focused on convincing the Afghans to lower import duties on Pakistani items from the existing ratio of 110 per cent. It solicited favourable treatment for visa applications by Pakistani businessmen. A case for waiving $100 fee on Pakistani containers on way to Central Asian markets via Afghanistan was also made.

    Mr Sarhadi said they also suggested the Afghan authorities to construct ‘export houses’ and warehouses to help exporters save money spent on handling charges and demurrage.

    On their part, said Mr Shinwari, the Afghans raised the delays in clearance of their transit trade items at Karachi. Afghans, he added, complained that delay in clearing the consignments caused them Rs200,000 to Rs250,000 additional costs on account of detention charges.

    “They said that they had already diverted their transit business to Iran,” said the KPCCI chief, adding the recent road blockade had strengthened their idea of taking Pakistan as the second option for trade.

    Though the senior Afghan functionaries, said Mr Shinwari, did not refer to the PTI’s ongoing road seizure, they did express their reservations tacitly.

    The Afghan authorities, said the businessman, pointed out that Pakistan had subjected the transit good to Afghanistan to five different types of securities, including insurance, digital trackers and other conditions, at a time when it could not guarantee an unhindered land route for transporters.

    They told the delegates, said Mr Shinwari, that they did not consider Pakistani route dependable and as a result they had already shifted 70 per cent of the transit business to Iran.

  • #2
    Imran should go and protest in jacob abad where the drones fly from.
    This is another dirty politics of punjabi establishment.
    If he is realy honest he should protest in front of GHQ to stop drones or shoot it down.



    Support pashto language and greater pukhtoonkhwa.

    pa prady jaba khabarai pakhtun naka
    be laila bala soda kho majnon naka
    gero jabo kre lahoo pa khpal tahzeeb ki
    be pakhtu ba de bal hestsok rastoon naka
    hamza baba
    پَښتو کښې اُولېکئ
    Pashto Keyboard Online (Afghan) LEXILOGOS >>

    Comment


    • #3
      This is the dirty and evil politics of isi and punjabi establishment under PTI.



      Support pashto language and greater pukhtoonkhwa.

      pa prady jaba khabarai pakhtun naka
      be laila bala soda kho majnon naka
      gero jabo kre lahoo pa khpal tahzeeb ki
      be pakhtu ba de bal hestsok rastoon naka
      hamza baba
      پَښتو کښې اُولېکئ
      Pashto Keyboard Online (Afghan) LEXILOGOS >>

      Comment


      • #4
        Buzdil Khan (coward khan) is destroying KP economy. Kick out this Punjani dog.

        Comment


        • #5
          This is the difference in slogan and reality. Imran can never stop the supply to NATO but definitely destroying the livelihood of many Pashtuns. Imran is a real enemy of Pashtuns. This man needs to be stopped.

          Comment


          • #6
            They still won't?Anyone wonder why?

            Because Iran and Pakistan case is different.

            According to UN.A landlocked country should get access to sea through his neighbour but paying nothing.Pakistan agree to this charter of UN while Iran doesnt.

            I have read a big article about this years back.They would have opted for Iran route long back But unlike us.Iran doesnt give a damn about muslim country and always think of its interest More

            Hence Afghanistan trader will have to pay more through Iran and nothing through Except the usuall cross border small transaction

            But this doesnt mean i am supporting Imran Khan.I do support Imran khan will to stop The NATO supply line though the civilian supply line should be continue
            "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

            Comment


            • #7
              Buzdil Khan's mindless populism

              Mindless populism - DAWN.COM

              IT has been over four weeks now since the Nato ground supply line through the Torkham border was blocked. The Pakistan Tehreek-i-Insaf has declared it a tactical victory for its anti-drone campaign. Yet, last week a drone strike in North Waziristan reportedly killed four militants.

              So, where does the PTI’s protest go from here? Imran Khan vows to continue his campaign till the US gives in. The latest strike, however, shows this is certainly not going to happen. It is something of a stretch to think that the US could be forced to change its policy by this isolated protest.

              Not only has the PTI led itself into a blind alley, its senseless action has undermined Pakistan’s position on the drone issue, increasing the country’s international isolation. Not surprisingly, the PTI”s solo flight finds support only from the Jamaat-i-Islami and the outlawed Tehreek-i-Taliban Pakistan. Both these groups have been directly affected by drone strikes, killing several of their members and commanders.

              The absurdity of the mob action has become more apparent as most of the Nato cargo shipment has long been diverted to other routes. While the stick-wielding PTI workers have blocked the Torkham crossing, the Chaman supply route is open. In fact, Torkham was not the main transit point prior to the PTI protest. The number of Nato cargo trucks passing through Khyber Pakhtunkhwa had declined sharply over the last several months.

              The US and Nato are now increasingly using the Central Asian route. That may be much costlier, but at least it is open and safer. Most of the shipment passing through Pakistan now consists of coalition withdrawal military hardware. What purpose does it serve to stop it?

              What the PTI does not understand is that Nato has nothing to do with the CIA’s drone operation. Pakistan is bound by international agreement to allow the passage of Nato cargo shipment to Afghanistan. But this irrational action has created an embarrassing situation for Pakistan. Drone attacks are a serious issue and concern Pakistan’s sovereignty, but they should be dealt with more prudently at the national level, not through mob action.

              It sets a dangerous precedent when a provincial government unilaterally takes a decision on an issue that involves international agreements and foreign policy. The PTI’s strange logic is that it is just implementing an APC resolution and the Peshawar High Court ruling ordering the Pakistan government to take measures to stop drone strikes.

              Imran Khan’s politics is full of paradoxes. His slogan for change got his party support from the youth and an educated urban middle class disillusioned with the established parties. A new generation of young professionals among the ticket holders made the party even more attractive for voters.

              But the so-called party for change has allied itself with the most retrogressive right-wing politics. In fact, the Jamaat-i-Islami having been marginalised in electoral politics is now piggybacking on the PTI.

              Imran Khan’s one-dimensional approach to the drone issue has blurred his party’s position on the much graver problem of violent extremism and militancy that has led to a thousand times more civilian deaths. Its vociferous support for reconciliation with the Taliban when the militants continue to attack Pakistani forces and civilians make us wonder which side of the conflict the party is on.

              It appears that the PTI’s anti-drone campaign is not as much a protest against the US breaching Pakistan’s sovereignty as a defence of militants under attack. The drone strike on a madressah in Hangu in KP that killed five senior members of the Haqqani Network triggered the blockade. No doubt, the attack inside Pakistani territory violating our sovereignty is unacceptable. But foreign fighters taking sanctuary inside the country is an equally serious national security issue.

              And it is certainly also the responsibility of the provincial administration not to allow Afghan insurgents to operate from its soil. It is very clear that the US drone strikes will not stop until Al Qaeda and other militant sanctuaries in the tribal areas are not cleared.

              Instead of keeping a singular focus on drone politics the PTI could serve the people of KP much better by getting its priorities right on militancy. In fact, the policy of appeasement has allowed the militants much more space in the province. The presence of the Taliban is reported to have increased in Peshawar and the surrounding areas.

              With a sympathetic government in the province they have nothing to be afraid of. Some 279 civilians and 40 security personnel were killed in 22 suicide bomb attacks in the province in 2013 alone.

              It is indeed commendable that the PTI chief has pledged to personally spearhead polio vaccination efforts in the troubled province that has remained the centre of the Taliban’s resistance to the immunisation campaign. Several vaccinators have so far been killed in the militant attacks in the province. The success of the vaccination campaign is directly linked to the battle against violent extremism.

              It is not the drone attacks, but militancy and terrorism which present the biggest threat to Pakistan’s security. The drone strikes are now taking place only in North Waziristan where Pakistani forces are also fighting local as well as foreign militants. That raises the question of whether drones targeting the common enemy are more dangerous, or the policy of appeasing the Taliban. Imran Khan’s populist drone politics only strengthens the militant narrative of war against the Pakistani state.

              The writer is an author and journalist

              Comment


              • #8
                Daily Mashriq Newspaper is the oldest and most authentic newspaper published in Urdu from Peshawar. This is the e-paper version of Daily Mashriq.


                Comment


                • #9
                  American agents have started crying... Good

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Originally posted by jankhan View Post
                    American agents have started crying... Good
                    They are worried about the supplies but not the drone strikes

                    Imran khan has no gains from blocking the supplies except Drone strikes.
                    "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Da Bannu Mazdigar View Post
                      They are worried about the supplies but not the drone strikes

                      Imran khan has no gains from blocking the supplies except Drone strikes.
                      First they used to say America will not be affected because they can have alternative routes and this and that... When blocked, now crying hahahah...

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Originally posted by jankhan View Post
                        First they used to say America will not be affected because they can have alternative routes and this and that... When blocked, now crying hahahah...
                        Estimated cost per month increase 5 folds when the supply line was closed after SALALA.

                        Some sources even claimed that the cost may go beyond 2billion dollars annually when winter hits.

                        Let them atleast pay 100million dollars more per month.

                        2011 NATO attack in Pakistan - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
                        "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Yeah let then spend more and more money because they are rich nations so it does not matter. Hahaha warka ddangg

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Originally posted by jankhan View Post
                            Yeah let then spend more and more money because they are rich nations so it does not matter. Hahaha warka ddangg
                            along with this i also enjoy when american puppet toramana and his likes cry

                            Warka dang che darr ki khwand :D
                            "[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              kind of late when you realise that US will withdraw most of the troops after 2014.....and the remaining ones wouldn't need that much supplies.
                              But if this makes you sleep better at night thinking you are now a good nation and muslims, keep beliving in this.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X