Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Punjabi and Pashto

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Originally posted by miniskit View Post
    Indians integrate better then muslims in western countries. If by integration you mean mass rapes of european women then Afghans are ahead. Otherwise Indians are better integrated in USA by any stretch of imagination. Only recent migrants will have problem adjusting early on. We don't have problem with alcohol or eating any food. That put us ahead of pretty much every muslim origin person out there. We also tend to be less conservative by order of magnitude compared to afghans. I don't believe afghans back home support taliban but when in western soil suddenly integrate like any other white, nice theory but not believable.


    That's funny because one of the largest demographoic representations of child sex predators in America are Indians.






    Not to mention the rape epidemic of India



    You're even raping tourists. So you have us beat by light years in that regards






    But even as much white bootlicking you do; You still get treated like dogs by Whites.




    Why Kansas killing won't stop Indians going to America - CNN.com

    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
    don’t try to be smart.

    Comment


    • #62
      Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
      That's funny because one of the largest demographoic representations of child sex predators in America are Indians.






      Not to mention the rape epidemic of India



      You're even raping tourists. So you have us beat by light years in that regards






      But even as much white bootlicking you do; You still get treated like dogs by Whites.




      Why Kansas killing won't stop Indians going to America - CNN.com
      Congrats you found few crimnals among millions of Indian Americans. We are richest comunity in USA for being rapists. Afghans in europe must doing great then.

      Comment


      • #63
        Originally posted by miniskit View Post
        Congrats you found few crimnals among millions of Indian Americans. We are richest comunity in USA for being rapists. Afghans in europe must doing great then.
        More specifically over-representation of Indians as sexual predators/sex offenders in not just America ...but India itself.

        Being a rapist and being wealthy are not mutually exclusive. For being such an extreme minority, the proportion of sex crimes by Indians is unusual.

        lol

        Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


        Originally posted by ذو الفقار
        don’t try to be smart.

        Comment


        • #64
          Originally posted by salman47 View Post
          Warsak(all of it,, lol)!

          ).
          Warsak, thats right on the outskirts of Peshawar. Which tribe do you belong to?

          Comment


          • #65
            Originally posted by toughpashtun View Post
            Warsak, thats right on the outskirts of Peshawar. Which tribe do you belong to?
            Khalilzai!
            My village is actually near the Dam(I don't know where Peshawar starts and ends, but in Peshawar Valley you can say.)
            Also where are you from? And your Kabila?

            Comment


            • #66
              Originally posted by salman47 View Post
              Khalilzai!
              My village is actually near the Dam(I don't know where Peshawar starts and ends, but in Peshawar Valley you can say.)
              Also where are you from? And your Kabila?
              Khalil or khalilzai?
              Originally posted by Kaushika

              majority of Hilly Rajputs are the product of these cross breeding and want to disassociate with their past. rajputs with rajwadi surnames consider themeselves superior but those native kings who look darker gets mocked as "gola" (mix breed, son of rakhile) so they actually invite light skinned rajputs and kshatriya tribes from Jammu region such as jamwals to sleep with their women so that their wives can give birth to pure white looking Native Child.

              Comment


              • #67
                Originally posted by Traveller View Post
                Khalil or khalilzai?
                Its the same thing!

                Comment


                • #68
                  Originally posted by salman47 View Post
                  Its the same thing!
                  Interesting, I've never heard of a Khalil reffering to themselves as Khalilzai.
                  Originally posted by Kaushika

                  majority of Hilly Rajputs are the product of these cross breeding and want to disassociate with their past. rajputs with rajwadi surnames consider themeselves superior but those native kings who look darker gets mocked as "gola" (mix breed, son of rakhile) so they actually invite light skinned rajputs and kshatriya tribes from Jammu region such as jamwals to sleep with their women so that their wives can give birth to pure white looking Native Child.

                  Comment


                  • #69
                    Originally posted by Traveller View Post
                    Interesting, I've never heard of a Khalil reffering to themselves as Khalilzai.
                    Yea i also have never heard of Khalils calling themselves Khalilzai.......its as unusual as Chamkanis calling themselves Chamkani-zai. Some sub-tribes exist by name of Khalilzai in Afghanistan and Pakistan, e.g Khalilzai branch of Khadarzai Gadoons.

                    Comment


                    • #70
                      Originally posted by salman47 View Post
                      Khalilzai!
                      My village is actually near the Dam(I don't know where Peshawar starts and ends, but in Peshawar Valley you can say.)
                      Also where are you from? And your Kabila?
                      Originally Khattak ,and from Karak.But born and bred in Peshawar.

                      Comment


                      • #71
                        Originally posted by Samandri View Post
                        Yea i also have never heard of Khalils calling themselves Khalilzai.......its as unusual as Chamkanis calling themselves Chamkani-zai. Some sub-tribes exist by name of Khalilzai in Afghanistan and Pakistan, e.g Khalilzai branch of Khadarzai Gadoons.
                        Serious question. How do you know about all these small subtribes?
                        Originally posted by Kaushika

                        majority of Hilly Rajputs are the product of these cross breeding and want to disassociate with their past. rajputs with rajwadi surnames consider themeselves superior but those native kings who look darker gets mocked as "gola" (mix breed, son of rakhile) so they actually invite light skinned rajputs and kshatriya tribes from Jammu region such as jamwals to sleep with their women so that their wives can give birth to pure white looking Native Child.

                        Comment


                        • #72
                          Originally posted by Traveller View Post
                          Interesting, I've never heard of a Khalil reffering to themselves as Khalilzai.
                          Yes you're right, but If you think about it, it means the same thing.

                          P.S. It shouldn't be an issue, I just happen to use Khalilzai instead of Khalil. It's small thing you know!

                          Comment


                          • #73
                            Originally posted by Traveller View Post
                            They do but the thing is that they can't "drown" themselves in Western society. As [MENTION=19985]maneatinglizard[/MENTION] stated it is largely due to their overtly "foreign" facial features.
                            I don't think that's accurate. Most Afghans don't look that white, I mean they're not terribly dark, but even facially, they're distinct from most people.

                            PLUS Afghan guys, as much as they tend to be more appealing to women physically than some dupa dupa head bopping Indian guy, ...ACT LIKE DOUCHE-BAGS ...trying to emulate Urban Ghetto culture is incredibly common among Afghans...they come off as pretentious and awkward posers, thinking they're being macho ...but it turns MOST women off.



                            If anything it's the women that are more vulnerable to being lured away. You have this concerted social agenda in Western culture that targets women.(whatever that **** means) and fixates on trying to manipulate and persuade women into particpating in certain behaviors, whether it's through celebrity role models or product placement, entertainment, lifestyle habits ...there's a predominant agenda to make women feel that unless they're stripped down and spread wide, they're disempowered and pathetic. If the woman is Muslim or from some very strong valued background, then the agenda is even more aggressive because they represent a forbidden fruit that "needs to be liberated". And the flipside to that is that they need to be rescued from "their men" , hence a similar agenda to throw men under the bus and encourage this surrogate form of false masculinity portrayed by this macho-thug culture is enabled for them. This is part of the reason why women assimilate more readily than males do in Western culture, they're a prized sexual resource hence, there's more interest in trying to facilitate them under their influence. Males are sexual competition, so there's more interest in undermining them.

                            (edit) I was supposed to send this reply over a week ago and never got around to it.

                            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                            don’t try to be smart.

                            Comment


                            • #74
                              Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                              I don't think that's accurate. Most Afghans don't look that white, I mean they're not terribly dark, but even facially, they're distinct from most people.

                              PLUS Afghan guys, as much as they tend to be more appealing to women physically than some dupa dupa head bopping Indian guy, ...ACT LIKE DOUCHE-BAGS ...trying to emulate Urban Ghetto culture is incredibly common among Afghans...they come off as pretentious and awkward posers, thinking they're being macho ...but it turns MOST women off.



                              If anything it's the women that are more vulnerable to being lured away. You have this concerted social agenda in Western culture that targets women.(whatever that **** means) and fixates on trying to manipulate and persuade women into particpating in certain behaviors, whether it's through celebrity role models or product placement, entertainment, lifestyle habits ...there's a predominant agenda to make women feel that unless they're stripped down and spread wide, they're disempowered and pathetic. If the woman is Muslim or from some very strong valued background, then the agenda is even more aggressive because they represent a forbidden fruit that "needs to be liberated". And the flipside to that is that they need to be rescued from "their men" , hence a similar agenda to throw men under the bus and encourage this surrogate form of false masculinity portrayed by this macho-thug culture is enabled for them. This is part of the reason why women assimilate more readily than males do in Western culture, they're a prized sexual resource hence, there's more interest in trying to facilitate them under their influence. Males are sexual competition, so there's more interest in undermining them.

                              (edit) I was supposed to send this reply over a week ago and never got around to it.
                              If males assimilate, women will follow suit. Existence of cultures and values depend solely on men (and the strenght of these men). Women will follow whatever culture men create and uphold.
                              Last edited by Nertj; 07-27-2017, 08:40 AM.

                              Comment


                              • #75
                                Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
                                I don't think that's accurate. Most Afghans don't look that white, I mean they're not terribly dark, but even facially, they're distinct from most people.

                                PLUS Afghan guys, as much as they tend to be more appealing to women physically than some dupa dupa head bopping Indian guy, ...ACT LIKE DOUCHE-BAGS ...trying to emulate Urban Ghetto culture is incredibly common among Afghans...they come off as pretentious and awkward posers, thinking they're being macho ...but it turns MOST women off.



                                If anything it's the women that are more vulnerable to being lured away. You have this concerted social agenda in Western culture that targets women.(whatever that **** means) and fixates on trying to manipulate and persuade women into particpating in certain behaviors, whether it's through celebrity role models or product placement, entertainment, lifestyle habits ...there's a predominant agenda to make women feel that unless they're stripped down and spread wide, they're disempowered and pathetic. If the woman is Muslim or from some very strong valued background, then the agenda is even more aggressive because they represent a forbidden fruit that "needs to be liberated". And the flipside to that is that they need to be rescued from "their men" , hence a similar agenda to throw men under the bus and encourage this surrogate form of false masculinity portrayed by this macho-thug culture is enabled for them. This is part of the reason why women assimilate more readily than males do in Western culture, they're a prized sexual resource hence, there's more interest in trying to facilitate them under their influence. Males are sexual competition, so there's more interest in undermining them.

                                (edit) I was supposed to send this reply over a week ago and never got around to it.
                                I don't know but it's something I've noticed. I personally don't assimilate well into western society(care about my Islamic values too much).
                                And I have seen evidence for that thing you said about macho-culture
                                Originally posted by Kaushika

                                majority of Hilly Rajputs are the product of these cross breeding and want to disassociate with their past. rajputs with rajwadi surnames consider themeselves superior but those native kings who look darker gets mocked as "gola" (mix breed, son of rakhile) so they actually invite light skinned rajputs and kshatriya tribes from Jammu region such as jamwals to sleep with their women so that their wives can give birth to pure white looking Native Child.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X