Originally posted by logical
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Is Pakistan going back to Pre 80's era of Booze , Bikini's and Bars ?
Collapse
X
-
Because you're so heavily brainwashed by nationalistic indoctrination, that you seem to be completely unaware that you're committing a straw man fallacy.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
-
Zip it wahhabi talib. Indian does not derive from indus river. Indian is now ubiquitously used as an umbrella term to denote indic ethnicities. Nationalities apart, reasserting my previous statement and fitting it seamlessly in your narrative will prove our point (without disambiguation). Sindhi-indic- indian-sindhi-desi :D pakistan. Not trying to disprove your assertions friendo. Make of this what you will.Originally posted by logical View PostThen why you sound like graduate from one of these madrassas? Indian derives from Indus river. Sindhi is ethnicity. Sindhi can be Pakistani or Indian.
Indian=ethnic group
fail
admit it you are stupid and dumb
Comment
-
----------
*You cannot climb the ladder of success with your hands in your pockets*
Originally posted by Karachilike I said, there was only one reason I pretended to be pathan, for a girl, who was from Afghan forums and also registered here
Comment
-
Kabul has never been a pashtun city, tajiks are the majority.Originally posted by Elite Pakhtun View PostI must admit... sometimes when i see videos of Afghanistan, particularly Kabul, i get taken aback by how many chinky faced people i see. It's not that few. I'm expecting to see people like me... And i see some of them, but there's always the chinky face ever present. More than i expect to see as well.
Is kabul the chinky face? That would make Islamabad more pakhtun than Kabul.
Comment
-
Why are you surprised by that? Every Central Asian country has Turkic origin people. Kabul was absorbed into Afghanistan in the late 18th century and the capital was moved to there from Kandahar. Before that Kabul wasnt part of Afghanistan (as in the historical, "non state" Afghanistan, being the land of Pashtun tribes).Originally posted by Elite Pakhtun View PostI must admit... sometimes when i see videos of Afghanistan, particularly Kabul, i get taken aback by how many chinky faced people i see. It's not that few. I'm expecting to see people like me... And i see some of them, but there's always the chinky face ever present. More than i expect to see as well.
Is kabul the chinky face? That would make Islamabad more pakhtun than Kabul.
Most people from Kabul are Tajiks but there is a huge number of Hazaras, maybe 1/4 of the population is. Nobody knows for sure. But there are still lots of Pashtuns there too.
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
sigpic
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
Comment
-
You're giving these stinking pakis too much credit if you think they can even understand what you're telling them.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostBecause you're so heavily brainwashed by nationalistic indoctrination, that you seem to be completely unaware that you're committing a straw man fallacy.
They dont possess the vocabulary or comprehension skills that you do.
Just look at Punjabi language after all. A cheap Dalit dialect that even its native speakers admit is an inferior language devoid of any sophistication and intelligence. Useful only for vulgar speech and making other people laugh by how ridiculous it sounds.
Stupid "Jats". What a disgusting vermin of a gypsy creature.
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
sigpic
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
Comment
-
exactly, I face palm any time I see "logical"'s posts, he's basically admitted that he's wiling to cuckold Pakistani women as long as Westerners think of them as modern and liberal.....pathetic example of low self esteem.Originally posted by Manzareh View PostHmmm
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
it very clear your Dravidian pretending to be Afghan.Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View PostYou're giving these stinking pakis too much credit if you think they can even understand what you're telling them.
They dont possess the vocabulary or comprehension skills that you do.
Just look at Punjabi language after all. A cheap Dalit dialect that even its native speakers admit is an inferior language devoid of any sophistication and intelligence. Useful only for vulgar speech and making other people laugh by how ridiculous it sounds.
Stupid "Jats". What a disgusting vermin of a gypsy creature.
Comment
-
Logical asserts that Indian derives from the Indus River, well guess where 93% of the Indus River is.
Indus River - Wikipedia

So even by that criteria, Logical is Indian.
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
The cradle of Dalit and Gypsy (un)civilization!Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostLogical asserts that Indian derives from the Indus River, well guess where 93% of the Indus River is.
Indus River - Wikipedia

So even by that criteria, Logical is Indian.
See below:
European Roma descended from Indian 'untouchables', genetic study shows
Roma gypsies in Britain and Europe are descended from "dalits" or low caste "untouchables" who migrated from the Indian sub-continent 1,400 years ago, a genetic study has suggested.
Gypsies have long believed they have origins in India, citing common Sanskrit words in their languages and photographs of darker-skinned ancestors in South Asian clothes, while earlier research has offered some scientific support for their suspicions.
Now a study led by Indian and Estonian academics, including Dr Toomas Kivisild of Cambridge University, has confirmed their origins in the Indian sub-continent, and even identified the location and social background from which they emerged.
The findings have been welcomed by Britain's Gypsy Council, which said it would help to promote understanding of Roma people throughout Europe. "We are Britain's first Non-Resident Indian community," said council spokesman Joseph Jones.
The study, which was published this month in the journal Nature, examined Y chromosomes in DNA samples to compare the genetic signatures of European Roma men with those of thousands of Indians from throughout the sub-continent.
Scientists from Hyderabad's Centre for Cellular and Molecular Biology collaborated with colleagues in Estonia and Switzerland to compare more than 10,000 samples, including from members of 214 different Indian ethnic groups. They were analysed to match a South Asian Y chromosome type known as "haplogroup H1a1a-M82", which passes down male bloodlines, with samples from Roma men in Europe.
While there were matches with samples from men throughout the Indian sub-continent, the closest match and the least genetic variation occurred with those from north-west India.
When the researchers overlaid the closest matches onto a genetic map of India, the highest density was in areas dominated by India's "doma", "scheduled tribes and castes" – the low caste dalits or untouchables who suffer widespread and generational discrimination and usually do society's dirtiest jobs.
The researchers believe the descendants of today's Roma gypsies in Europe began their westward exodus first to fight in wars in what is today Punjab between 1001 and 1026 on the promise of a promotion in caste status.
Later, they left to flee the fall of Hindu kingdoms in what is today Pakistan, with many setting off from near Gilgit.
The exodus to North Africa and Europe suggested they may have been early refugees from the spread of Islam into the Indian sub-continent. Dr Kivisild said the study had provided "evidence for the further interpretation of history of what kind of processes were triggerimg these movements".
Gypsy groups in Britain trace their own roots back first to Egypt – where they believe the name "gypsy" comes from – and beyond that to India. Joseph Jones of the Gypsy Council said early photographs show British gypsies with Indian facial features and styles of dress until 100 years ago.
He said the new study was helpful because it had scientifically confirmed the Indian origin of Britain and Europe's Roma community and that their common heritage should be accepted now by newer Indian communities in Britain. "We're not outcasts here. I don't care if we are associated with dalits – I don't live in a community where caste exists. I do feel a bit Indian, I've always felt an affinity with Indians," he said.
Gypsies were first noticed in Britain in around 1500 and acquired a reputation as itinerant craftsmen, traders and horse dealers.
European Roma descended from Indian 'untouchables', genetic study shows - Telegraph
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
sigpic
Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
Comment
-
That might explain why Kabulis have such a terrible reputation as scam artists, thieves, and very undesirable people.Originally posted by Kakar-Wardak View PostKabul has never been a pashtun city, tajiks are the majority.
No... Indian he's referring to is the country India. Those guys in that country have polluted the meaning of the word to mean them now.Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View PostLogical asserts that Indian derives from the Indus River, well guess where 93% of the Indus River is.
So even by that criteria, Logical is Indian.
Besides, you love their nasty women... not sure why you're saying anything.
Comment
-
Well I'm not bigoted, if I like a woman I'll like them regardless of their background but that's neither here nor there.Originally posted by Elite Pakhtun View PostThat might explain why Kabulis have such a terrible reputation as scam artists, thieves, and very undesirable people.
No... Indian he's referring to is the country India. Those guys in that country have polluted the meaning of the word to mean them now.
Besides, you love their nasty women... not sure why you're saying anything.
This guy is peddling his nationalist rhetoric; so calling the clear fallacy of it is what's being done here ...two completely unconnected issues .....Mr. $10 Internet IQ test lol
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment
-
Actually, I never actually claimed Indian is an ethnic group. I said you're ethnically, culturally and hereditarily Indian. Which is true, nowhere does this mean Indian is an ethnic group.Originally posted by logical View Postdon't tell me you didn't get that?
"Indian=ethnic, fail
"
hopefully you get it now. Ibliss aka madrassa graduate think Indian is ethnic group not me, read some posts above.
Do you know what fallacy of composition is?
Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."
Originally posted by ذو الفقارdon’t try to be smart.
Comment

Comment