Tweet
Why do some of these stinking pakis pretend that the imaginary provincial border between Sindh and Punjab is a physical obstacle that has historically prevented people from moving back and forth from when there is no such obstacle in reality either culturally or physically and never has been?
The boundary between Sindh and Punjab is nothing but line in the sand drawn by the British "Raj" for administrative reasons that was later inherited and kept by Pakiland. It isnt a natural or historical border that was decided by two different neighbouring and opposing peoples. It is a line drawn and imposed on the natives from the outside by the conquerors, just like the border between Pakiland and India is or the imaginary border between Pakhtunkhwa and Afghanistan.
Sindhis only became "Sindhis" during the British "Raj", just like how Punjabis only became "Punjabis" during British rule. These are very recently formed ethnic identities. They are not historical or natively evolved that is why you find no mention of a "Punjabi people" in history before the British rule.
Before the British introduced the notion of linguistic based regional and ethnic identities into India, the subcontinental natives all had 'castes' as their primary communal identities, seconded by religion. The concept of language based primacy to define an "ethnicity" was non-existent before the British ruled India and changed their culture and society.
It is amazing how little to nothing subcontinentals, both Paki and Indian, know or want to learn about their own native history before the British reinterpreted and reinvented it for them, filling their half empty heads with stupid myths and pseudo anthropological studies from an Orientalist British lens.
Actually it is both sad and funny at the same time how mentally colonized Pakis and Indians are. Most of them, especially Pakis, are incapable of challenging the myths they have about themselves and are fixated only on trying to differentiate from each other and identify with foreigners to try and feel "special" and "different" from the rest of their fellow Dravidians
The British legacy of divide, rule , colonzie and plunder runs deep in South Asia.
The boundary between Sindh and Punjab is nothing but line in the sand drawn by the British "Raj" for administrative reasons that was later inherited and kept by Pakiland. It isnt a natural or historical border that was decided by two different neighbouring and opposing peoples. It is a line drawn and imposed on the natives from the outside by the conquerors, just like the border between Pakiland and India is or the imaginary border between Pakhtunkhwa and Afghanistan.
Sindhis only became "Sindhis" during the British "Raj", just like how Punjabis only became "Punjabis" during British rule. These are very recently formed ethnic identities. They are not historical or natively evolved that is why you find no mention of a "Punjabi people" in history before the British rule.
Before the British introduced the notion of linguistic based regional and ethnic identities into India, the subcontinental natives all had 'castes' as their primary communal identities, seconded by religion. The concept of language based primacy to define an "ethnicity" was non-existent before the British ruled India and changed their culture and society.
It is amazing how little to nothing subcontinentals, both Paki and Indian, know or want to learn about their own native history before the British reinterpreted and reinvented it for them, filling their half empty heads with stupid myths and pseudo anthropological studies from an Orientalist British lens.
Actually it is both sad and funny at the same time how mentally colonized Pakis and Indians are. Most of them, especially Pakis, are incapable of challenging the myths they have about themselves and are fixated only on trying to differentiate from each other and identify with foreigners to try and feel "special" and "different" from the rest of their fellow Dravidians
The British legacy of divide, rule , colonzie and plunder runs deep in South Asia.
Comment