Tajik troll caught on Wikipedia

[Pakhtun]

They are natives, otherwise Herat, Mazar and Kabul wouldn't be majority Farsi spekaing citys.

Stupid logic.

Aboriginals are natives of Australia yet overwhelming majority speak English in every city across the continent.

[Kushan Prince]

They are natives, otherwise Herat, Mazar and Kabul wouldn't be majority Farsi spekaing citys.

Your Logic is flawed. Kabul is a predominitly Pashtun city btw. I agree with pakhtun here. The majority of Farsi speakers in these are Pashtuns who speak Farsi because of political reasons. As of all kings of Afghanistan have.

[Admin Khan]

Kabul is 60-70% Pashtun, and they speak Pashto.

[randolph85]

Natives of what? Not Afghanistan that's for sure.

that's totally untrue. tajiks are native to the north,central, and west of the country and there are more tajiks living in these areas inside afghanistan than outside of afghanistan. this is while most afghans don't even live in afghanistan.

[randolph85]

Your Logic is flawed. Kabul is a predominitly Pashtun city btw. I agree with pakhtun here. The majority of Farsi speakers in these are Pashtuns who speak Farsi because of political reasons. As of all kings of Afghanistan have.

the rise of kabul's pashtun population has mostly happened in the last 10 years with the return of refugees from pakistan. just from observation, kabul is not majority pashtun.

[randolph85]

trying to erase any tajik link to our soil is like what the kikes are doing to the palestinians.

[Admin Khan]

r u high?

This not my 'opinion'

The Afghan Ministry of Rural Rehabilitation & Development estimate that Pashtuns are approximately 60% of the population and make up the majority in the province

Kabul - The ethnic Pashtun make up the largest percentage of the population of the province Kabul - YouTube

This is according to AFGHANISTAN.

[randolph85]

while i have no doubt that pashtuns are the majority of kabul province, i have a hard time believing a government that hasn't been able to take a census of the country in the last 11 years.

[Kushan Prince]

that's totally untrue. tajiks are native to the north,central, and west of the country and there are more tajiks living in these areas inside afghanistan than outside of afghanistan. this is while most afghans don't even live in afghanistan.

I have to disagree here randolph. There are several theories about the tajiks. One of them is that they are desednandts of persian migration which happened when the mongols sacked iran and they came in as refugees into the north since the mongols attacked from the north. Even kuchis themselves say that pasthuns were once natives of the north and central parts until the mongols attacked. Another theory is that they are just Persianized pashtuns who adopted farsi and Persian culture. But it depends on who you ask really.

[randolph85]

I have to disagree here randolph. There are several theories about the tajiks. One of them is that they are desednandts of persian migration which happened when the mongols sacked iran and they came in as refugees into the north since the mongols attacked from the north. Even kuchis themselves say that pasthuns were once natives of the north and central parts until the mongols attacked. Another theory is that they are just Persianized pashtuns who adopted farsi and Persian culture. But it depends on who you ask really.

the physical differences rule out any pashtun connection, as a trained afghan eye can usually differentiate a tajik and a pashtun. there is no proof of older signifigant pashtun populations in modern day tajik areas such mazar, herat, or kabul city. to me, a kuchis 1000 yr old spoken word pseudo history holds no weight against real documented history.

tajiks and pashtuns are both of the same soil, trying to discredit ones history is unislamic.

[Kushan Prince]

the physical differences rule out any pashtun connection, as a trained afghan eye can usually differentiate a tajik and a pashtun. there is no proof of older signifigant pashtun populations in modern day tajik areas such mazar, herat, or kabul city. to me, a kuchis 1000 yr old spoken word pseudo history holds no weight against real documented history.

tajiks and pashtuns are both of the same soil, trying to discredit ones history is unislamic.

My family is from the north (Balkh to be exact) and it would be a slap to the face if it was just refereed to as "tajik land". It's an oxymoron to call it "tajik areas" since there is no real historical proof that tajiks were there before pasthuns. other then the Iranian encyclopedia (which is totally biased and against pasthuns) say that even tajiks were native to to the south. Can you believe that? Just because there are more pasthuns in the south, doesn't mean there can't be pasthuns in the north. Although i agree with your last post, but what makes you not believe the kuchis a thousand year old nomadic people, then to trust western propaganda writing history about Afghanistan?

[Khostai]

Stupid logic.

Aboriginals are natives of Australia yet overwhelming majority speak English in every city across the continent.

Don't bring Australie in to this, becuase thats totaly difrent, or are you gona claim now that those Tajiks killed all those Pashtuns????

[Khostai]

Your Logic is flawed. Kabul is a predominitly Pashtun city btw. I agree with pakhtun here. The majority of Farsi speakers in these are Pashtuns who speak Farsi because of political reasons. As of all kings of Afghanistan have.

Its can be now but that still don't proof the claim that Tajiks are not native to Afghanistan.

[randolph85]

My family is from the north (Balkh to be exact) and it would be a slap to the face if it was just refereed to as "tajik land". It's an oxymoron to call it "tajik areas" since there is no real historical proof that tajiks were there before pasthuns. other then the Iranian encyclopedia (which is totally biased and against pasthuns) say that even tajiks were native to to the south. Can you believe that? Just because there are more pasthuns in the south, doesn't mean there can't be pasthuns in the north. Although i agree with your last post, but what makes you not believe the kuchis a thousand year old nomadic people, then to trust western propaganda writing history about Afghanistan?

most northern pashtuns were settled there by abdur rahman khan. tajiks live in kandahar and helmand but we can call them "pashtun areas" and likewise there is no historical proof that pashtuns were there before tajiks. i don't trust kuchi stories 100% because unless something is written down, "facts" seem to fade away each time someone tells the story throughout time. i mean pashtuns are not even in agreement about the origins of our people, so of course there is room for doubt whenever something is discussed about pashtun history.

[Kushan Prince]

Its can be now but that still don't proof the claim that Tajiks are not native to Afghanistan.

You keep saying they are native while I keep saying they aren't. If these so called Tajiks are native then why are only pashtuns considered afghans and the natives while Tajiks aren't. Why can't Tajiks also be considered the natives? Just a quick sidenote: 2 different ethnic groups cannot be native to one region. It's called vast migration which people have been doing for thousands of years.