Tweet
Originally posted by torkham
View Post
-
His cabinet is full of Panjshiris, what do you expect?Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620 -
No it was becuase of the taliban, every time I hear a racist Tajik discriminate Pashtuns they always talk about taliban.Originally posted by khushal View Post
Yes the peopel who are now in power in Kabul also contribute to it but the bigest reason are talib whith there baning of Farsi from goverment. And other meaningles discrimination that they did against the minorities.Comment
-
-
-
Not anymore, they once upon a time looted.Originally posted by Midnight_Sun View PostEven Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620Comment
-
Probably still explains why they got their own province.Comment
-
all these videos and this is done by a couple of guys.
they makes videos against pashtuns while acting like tajiks hazaras etc and vice versa.
they arent even Afghan,but tajokistani ,they also make the videos for youtube and had multiple accounts on this forum.
kabulzada is one of them.
Comment
-
they are afghan tajiks. do you really think a tajik from tajikistan cares enough to troll afghans? they are completely out of touch with their own tajiks from afg.
the tajik nationalists that troll across forums, youtube, and wikipedia are the same small group of losers. when i mean small i mean like literally a few guys. look what happened to their tajikam forum, their top poster who got ran out of this forum was too extremist even for the nationalists there and the forum died. its all russian penis enlargement ads now.There are people today who think that admitting God’s absolute greatness decreases the value and importance of humans in the creation, as if God and mankind are rivals competing in greatness and power. Meanwhile I feel that whenever our perception of God’s greatness increases, with it we become greater, because we are the creation of a great God.
Sayyid QutbComment
-
Incorrect, the Uzbeks rebelled against the Durranis......Ahmed Shah was not a Nationalist, he was a Jamiet, Islamist backed by ISI, he took his Tajik side "during" civil war as naturally people do in such a conflict, but he was not a Nationalist, Rabbani was not a nationalist, Ismail Khan was not a Nationalist, they all supported sharia, they had support from ISI.Originally posted by Kushan Prince View Post
I don't think a real Nationalist ever existed in Afghan history, all i see are tribal warlords fighting one another for power and terrority.Comment
-
However, hatred between Farsibans and Pashtuns exist...........I know plenty of Pashtuns in Afghanistan who have suffered due to these Mongoliod Turkmen called Tajiks.Originally posted by ډګروال View Post
but there are Pashtuns who kiss the but cheek of Arabs and Punjabis as well.
Well, its a tribalistic society, Afghanistan, they will side with the winner and make profit from the loser as usual, so dont be shocked to see such trolls.Comment
-
I was talking about Ahmad shah durrani, not Ahmad shah massive because he was a stupid Tajik nationalist who worked with the Russians.Originally posted by Soldat_Amir View Post"Revenge is a dish best served cold".
-Old Pashtun proverb
"My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"Comment
-
Tajiks should return to Tajikstan, they complain too much and hate on others, nothing but trouble. We Pashtuns are the natives, it's our land.Yama Pukhtoon da Pukhtano sara zam.Comment
-
-
Natives of what? Not Afghanistan that's for sure.Originally posted by KGODB View Post"Revenge is a dish best served cold".
-Old Pashtun proverb
"My Pashtun Pride i will not hide!"Comment
-
They are natives, otherwise Herat, Mazar and Kabul wouldn't be majority Farsi spekaing citys.Originally posted by Kushan Prince View PostComment
Comment