Split Discussion: 'Aryan Race' Etc.

[Nima Khan Abdali]

Stormfront?????????



This Stormfront?

No. The Stormfront that you are talking about is only a forum, and does not have any affilities or financial basis. But the Stormfront that I am talking about is a company that supplies facts and information to that forum that you are talking about, and it has a financial basis. They are not run by the same person or same environment, but they have the same orientation.

Like, saying two organizations with the phrase "Crimson" in both of their names will be both speaking about crimson but not neccessarily they are the same thing.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

No. The Stormfront that you are talking about is only a forum, and does not have any affilities or financial basis. But the Stormfront that I am talking about is a company that supplies facts and information to that forum that you are talking about, and it has a financial basis. They are not run by the same person or same environment, but they have the same orientation.

Like, saying two organizations with the phrase "Crimson" in both of their names will be both speaking about crimson but not neccessarily they are the same thing.

So your organization is a white supremacist organization?

[Nima Khan Abdali]

So your organization is a white supremacist organization?

Yes!

[faye]

which one of you guys, has had the sex change?

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Yes!

Why do you want to affiliate with a group which would stir animosity in your country which has numerous people who are not considered "caucasian".

[Nima Khan Abdali]

which one of you guys, has had the sex change?

What does it mean?

[Nima Khan Abdali]

Why do you want to affiliate with a group which would stir animosity in your country which has numerous people who are not considered "caucasian".

In Afghanistan there are hazaras and other s h i t like turks which are used by some shia groups in the world against Pashtuns, so I'd rather side to any other Aryans - English, Dutch, anything Aryan - true brothers of Pashtuns by blood than them.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

In Afghanistan there are hazaras and other ****s like turks which are used by some shia groups in the world against Pashtuns, so I'd rather side to any other Aryans - English, Dutch, anything Aryan - true brothers of Pashtuns by blood than them.

**** that they're not true brothers of Pashtuns; the English have been the biggest enemies of Afghanistan. They're not even our brothers by blood , they come from a totally different DNA maker group. They're not even Aryan, since they don't descend from the tribes of Aryana.

What about the Ghilzai Pashstuns who are descended from Turks?

[Nima Khan Abdali]

**** that they're not true brothers of Pashtuns; the English have been the biggest enemies of Afghanistan. They're not even our brothers by blood , they come from a totally different DNA maker group. They're not even Aryan, since they don't descend from the tribes of Aryana.

What about the Ghilzai Pashstuns who are descended from Turks?

Oh my God, what you are saying? What a shame! First of all, Pashtuns are Aryans (Indo-European ethno-linguistic group), and no Pashto can be descendand from those sons of b i t c h e s (turks).

English is an Aryan group, which can be very obviously seen.

Aryan DNA maker is R1b, which should be over 86% in the blood of a person for that person to be a full Aryan.

I am a true Indo-European, for example, with 97% R1b and 3% H4.

[RevolutionThroughReason]

In 689/1290 Jalal al-din Firuz Khalji succeeded the Mamluk kings on the throne of Delhi and his short-lived dynasty lasted till 1320. [10]

Another Khalji dynasty, descended from a brother of Firuz, ruled in Central India (Malwa) AD. 1436-1531. Equally the Lodhi kings of Delhi (AD. 1451-1526) belonged to a Khalji family which was established in Multan already towards AD 1005.

The Khalji in India were considered as Afghans and perhaps in the fifteenth century possessed no knowledge of Turkish but we must remember what Najib Bakran says on the changes undergone by the Khalaj of Afghanistan. In Afghanistan and India the descendants of the Khalaj are called Ghal-zae, i.e. "sons of the thief". [11] This later popular etymology and the legend built up round it are certainly artificial. The fact is that the important Ghilzai tribe occupies now the region round Ghazni, [12] where the Khalaj used to live and that historical data all point, to the transformation of the Turkish Khalaj into Afghan Ghilzai. Even the phonetic evolution of the name has nothing astonishing. The ancient Turkish form was Qalaj (or Qalach), and it is well known that Turkish q was heard by the Arabs now as kh and now as gh. [13] Qalaj could have a parallel form *Ghalaj of which it was easv to bring the end in conformity with the usual Afghan terminology of zae, zai (= Persian -zada).

[RevolutionThroughReason]

Oh my God, what you are saying? What a shame! First of all, Pashtuns are Aryans (Indo-European ethno-linguistic group), and no Pashto can be descendand from those sons of b i t c h e s (turks).

English is an Aryan group, which can be very obviously seen.

Aryan DNA maker is R1b, which should be over 86% in the blood of a person for that person to be a full Aryan.

I am a true Indo-European, for example, with 97% R1b and 3% H4.

Actually Many Pashtuns are descended from Turks, no Aryan DNA marker is R1a1


English isn't an Aryan group sorry.

The Ghilzai are derived from Turks ......it's true ...even some Abdali are of Turkish origins since Abdali were Hephtalites and they intermarried with Turks

http://www.khyber.org/articles/2005/TheKhalajWestoftheOxus.shtml

In 689/1290 Jalal al-din Firuz Khalji succeeded the Mamluk kings on the throne of Delhi and his short-lived dynasty lasted till 1320. [10]

Another Khalji dynasty, descended from a brother of Firuz, ruled in Central India (Malwa) AD. 1436-1531. Equally the Lodhi kings of Delhi (AD. 1451-1526) belonged to a Khalji family which was established in Multan already towards AD 1005.

The Khalji in India were considered as Afghans and perhaps in the fifteenth century possessed no knowledge of Turkish but we must remember what Najib Bakran says on the changes undergone by the Khalaj of Afghanistan. In Afghanistan and India the descendants of the Khalaj are called Ghal-zae, i.e. "sons of the thief". [11] This later popular etymology and the legend built up round it are certainly artificial. The fact is that the important Ghilzai tribe occupies now the region round Ghazni, [12] where the Khalaj used to live and that historical data all point, to the transformation of the Turkish Khalaj into Afghan Ghilzai. Even the phonetic evolution of the name has nothing astonishing. The ancient Turkish form was Qalaj (or Qalach), and it is well known that Turkish q was heard by the Arabs now as kh and now as gh. [13] Qalaj could have a parallel form *Ghalaj of which it was easv to bring the end in conformity with the usual Afghan terminology of zae, zai (= Persian -zada).

[Nima Khan Abdali]

In 689/1290 Jalal al-din Firuz Khalji succeeded the Mamluk kings on the throne of Delhi and his short-lived dynasty lasted till 1320. [10]

Another Khalji dynasty, descended from a brother of Firuz, ruled in Central India (Malwa) AD. 1436-1531. Equally the Lodhi kings of Delhi (AD. 1451-1526) belonged to a Khalji family which was established in Multan already towards AD 1005.

The Khalji in India were considered as Afghans and perhaps in the fifteenth century possessed no knowledge of Turkish but we must remember what Najib Bakran says on the changes undergone by the Khalaj of Afghanistan. In Afghanistan and India the descendants of the Khalaj are called Ghal-zae, i.e. "sons of the thief". [11] This later popular etymology and the legend built up round it are certainly artificial. The fact is that the important Ghilzai tribe occupies now the region round Ghazni, [12] where the Khalaj used to live and that historical data all point, to the transformation of the Turkish Khalaj into Afghan Ghilzai. Even the phonetic evolution of the name has nothing astonishing. The ancient Turkish form was Qalaj (or Qalach), and it is well known that Turkish q was heard by the Arabs now as kh and now as gh. [13] Qalaj could have a parallel form *Ghalaj of which it was easv to bring the end in conformity with the usual Afghan terminology of zae, zai (= Persian -zada).

They should then have the turkmenid phenotype in their blood, as it is the only proof of one's being turk. But thanksgod they don't. Pashtuns are real Eastern Iranids, which is a subfamily of Iranids, which is a subfamily of Irano-Germanids, which is in turn a subfamily of Aryans (Indo-Europeans). Notice that the English (beside others) does also belong to Irano-Germanid subfamily. Pashtuns and English are not only both members of Aryans, but also they are even closer relatives, as both of them are members of a smaller family (Irano-Germanid).

[Nima Khan Abdali]

In 689/1290 Jalal al-din Firuz Khalji succeeded the Mamluk kings on the throne of Delhi and his short-lived dynasty lasted till 1320. [10]

Another Khalji dynasty, descended from a brother of Firuz, ruled in Central India (Malwa) AD. 1436-1531. Equally the Lodhi kings of Delhi (AD. 1451-1526) belonged to a Khalji family which was established in Multan already towards AD 1005.

The Khalji in India were considered as Afghans and perhaps in the fifteenth century possessed no knowledge of Turkish but we must remember what Najib Bakran says on the changes undergone by the Khalaj of Afghanistan. In Afghanistan and India the descendants of the Khalaj are called Ghal-zae, i.e. "sons of the thief". [11] This later popular etymology and the legend built up round it are certainly artificial. The fact is that the important Ghilzai tribe occupies now the region round Ghazni, [12] where the Khalaj used to live and that historical data all point, to the transformation of the Turkish Khalaj into Afghan Ghilzai. Even the phonetic evolution of the name has nothing astonishing. The ancient Turkish form was Qalaj (or Qalach), and it is well known that Turkish q was heard by the Arabs now as kh and now as gh. [13] Qalaj could have a parallel form *Ghalaj of which it was easv to bring the end in conformity with the usual Afghan terminology of zae, zai (= Persian -zada).

History always tends to lie, so it sucks.

[Nima Khan Abdali]

Actually Many Pashtuns are descended from Turks, no Aryan DNA marker is R1a1


English isn't an Aryan group sorry.

The Ghilzai are derived from Turks ......it's true ...even some Abdali are of Turkish origins since Abdali were Hephtalites and they intermarried with Turks
http://www.khyber.org/articles/2005/...ftheOxus.shtml

Why are you insulting me? I am an Abdali too.

[Nima Khan Abdali]

"It is true because khyber.org said so" revolutionthroughQatNigga

Pashtuns are very pure Aryans. No turk mongrel is related (God forbid) to Pashtuns. Pa forum ki jasus dai, yar!