Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Women belong in the Kitchen :P

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #46
    only women could make such a big deal about cooking. cooking is easy, for me at least. i actually like cooking because its relaxing and also it allows me to be creative and pay attention. not to mention, i know what kind of food i like and how to cook it. so no tension

    Comment


    • #47
      Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
      Well I'm asking you a question, maybe by addressing this question we can have a greater understanding of the roles of men and women. So instead of trying to avoid the question. Give some sort of relevant response to it.

      So I'm going to re-state my question; if you avoid answering for a third time then it means you have something to hide or you're afraid of answering because you find the answer would interfere with your beliefs.

      Why did sexual dimorphism evolve the way it did and how did it get there in our species?
      I do not know why you ask this question when I categorically said that the topic is women role in cooking not biology of sexual dimorphism. I have studied biology as one subject in university and what I remember is that sexual dimorphism is evolved because of many reasons like sexual selection, anisogamy, sexy son hypothesis, handicap principal etc.

      In humans the genes , hormones, basal metabolic rate etc are responsible for this phenomenon. I have already mentioned that I do recognize the morphological and some physiological differences between men and women. Men are not exactly what women are or vice versa. But when we talk of a role like cooking, gender or sexual dimorphism has nothing to do. Here it is nurture what matters not nature. I have seen men who cook the best and women who cannot boil an egg.

      Comment


      • #48
        Well because your statements incorporated many assumptions which assumed equilaterality between genders. This is not consistent with Sexual Dimorphism. If equilaterality was the tendency of both genders then you should have a sound explanation for why Sexual Dimorphism arose.

        That's why you must answer, if your statement was JUST about cooking I wouldn't ask this question, but since you said MORE than that, It is now your intellectual responsibility to explain sexual dimorphism and how and why did it evolve in humans.

        Stop avoiding
        [QUOTE=Afghanistan2010;658085][B]He is no different [COLOR="Red"]than us[/COLOR][/B],[B]he[COLOR="Red"] blindly believes [/COLOR]in the words [COLOR="Red"]of other men[/COLOR][/B],:[/QUOTE]

        2010 Admitting he's a blind believer not in God, but what other men says.

        Comment


        • #49
          Originally posted by RevolutionThroughReason View Post
          Well because your statements incorporated many assumptions which assumed equilaterality between genders. This is not consistent with Sexual Dimorphism. If equilaterality was the tendency of both genders then you should have a sound explanation for why Sexual Dimorphism arose.

          That's why you must answer, if your statement was JUST about cooking I wouldn't ask this question, but since you said MORE than that, It is now your intellectual responsibility to explain sexual dimorphism and how and why did it evolve in humans.

          Stop avoiding
          you're so silly

          Comment

          Working...
          X