No pants day in New York City

[sahil112]

bruv even dis is weird for me LOL dats jus nasty why walk around dey might aswell just have a big orgy right der group ting save them tym and ****

[sahil112]

dis is kinda perverted also and nuthing to do with tolrance ders limits 2 everything even freedom of speech its like we dnt like to hear ppl curse islam say bad things bout it ryt and in da sme way sum of us dnt wana wake up 2 catch a train and see a load of naked ppl

[kakargirl]

they might as well go nude such begharath people why stop at the pants it should be called no clothes day i think every day they go back to stone age when people were running around naked lol but even those people tried to cover them selves with animals skin ,leafs ect but they didnt have a choice then but this is such ignorance in this day and age .

[Catya Sher]

Good comments by all the usual people I like.
Don't have time to put a thanks by all them.
Appreciate that there are sane souls on earth.

Most righteous people would say that
there is so much wickedness - witness THIS - that
God will be taking this in hand soon....

Some would opine that the Day of Judgment
may be approaching.

Certainly some punishment will be in sight.

After all, evil is evil.
No apologies can be extended for such shameless displays
of immodesty.

[darwezkhail]

SO you are saying that freedom is telling a woman to walk around half-naked? Did you join them in not wearing pants??

First, I don't care how Americans dress or how they live. I also don't care what American guys or girls do before marriage. I could care less.

People around the world really don't care how Americans dress or live their lives. SOrry to disappoint you. And I suspect the average American does not give a crap how Muslims live their lives. Our culture is ours, and no one has a right to tell us anything, just as we don't have to tell them how to live.




HOWEVER, this is not a culture, and no normal person wants it, believe me on that.

That is what I asked him too.

If it hadn't been for negative effects on the economy, Americans would be the first to renounce clothing altogether, living and going about life completely naked with people like shlombay lined up right behind them in subservience and admiration. Why? Because they are a God-less people so how can you expect them to understand what morality and culture is? Morality as we observe and know it today stems from the teachings of God and his prophets to begin with so if a people do not recognize the source how can you expect them to observe and recognize the mandates thereof?

[randolph85]

why should a muslim be tolerant of stupidity?

[darwezkhail]

Darwezakail no I did not participate. You don't seem to get the point do you? The point whether they are naked or in a hijab, it is their free right. Be tolerant. Don't enforce your Taliban mentality on average New Yorkers.

There was a Hijabi and a girl in panties no one cared what they where wearing.

There is a reason NYC is the financial capital of the world. There is a reason why there is not a single Muslim city in the world that looks anywhere close to this

You may call my mentality a "Taliban" one for disagreeing with lewdness and depravity but in reality the real reference you are making is to the Islamic mentality wherein this form of "tolerance" should never be accepted ever. So what you are actually trying to condemn and insult is Islam.

The point is these very people whose tolerance you encourage and admire are the ones who have sent their military forces to fight in far-off lands claiming to want to liberate women from having to cover. And in the States, I can say for certain that a woman observing the hijab is not regarded as equal to her uncovered, lewd counterparts and treated in a drastically different manner.

What sort of tolerance is that? If these so-called open-minded beings truly believed in allowing for the freedom to live as people wish, they would not be violently enforcing their perverted modes of living on people whose modes and ideals differ.

As far as the financial capital of the world is concerned, it is actually all predicted to collapse in the near future anyway considering the nearly 14 trillion dollars of debt incurred, and the general political and economic disarray the country is in both internally and abroad. Such things are always transient and not meant to last forever.

[ScimitarXEdge]

Darwezakail no I did not participate. You don't seem to get the point do you? The point whether they are naked or in a hijab, it is their free right. Be tolerant. Don't enforce your Taliban mentality on average New Yorkers.

There was a Hijabi and a girl in panties no one cared what they where wearing.

There is a reason NYC is the financial capital of the world. There is a reason why there is not a single Muslim city in the world that looks anywhere close to this

You're completely wrong and your reasoning is flawed.

No Adult or Thinking person would believe such ideas because this is corruption and corruption is the opposite of freedom, all corruption oppresses humanity, the people who choose to do this are in reality suffering from oppression, and that's why they do such things. You can't use the "Taliban" excuse; because the Taliban murdered innocent people who were GOOD MUSLIMS; these people are not innocent or good at all.

And no Place in the world should look like that; It pollutes Nature and violates the Environment. You need to rethink your priorities. Buildings are not the standard of Progress, How well Humans live with Nature is.

You should start questioning these standards instead of blindly following them just because they comfort you, because that comfort is pacification and pacification is just to keep the flock of sheep in line.

[Gulalai]

let me just say... i agree that this is disgusting.. but not only because the women are dressed in panties... but also then men are too! akh.. no one wants to see his junk
It is as awkward (or maybe even more awkward) for a women to get off a train and see a man with out pants on as much as it is for a man to get off a train and see a woman with out pants on
& i know those of you who have mentioned gender are men... so obviously you would talk about not wanting to see a woman with out pants on but i'm just saying we don't want to see pantless guys walking around as much as you don't want to see pantless girls walking around.

Some of you here are saying "let them do what ever they want"... well we did not say that we are going to force them to wear pants... we are just saying that we believe it is morally incorrect, it's disgusting, we don't want to see that, and we believe that no one should be promoting such a thing.
(well i am at least speaking for myself.)

[Catya Sher]

^ Good comment, Unknown - it's really true, women are pressured and don't have the WILLPOWER to say NO
Not to this
Not to anything wrong whatsoever
One has to realize this place is a group of zombies for the most part who simply
take their cue from Devil-ridden rock stars, movie actors and actresses,
immoral politicans, each of which gets simply more and more flagrant in
showing off their rebellion against Allah [swt].

For THIS is what it is all about. Including the event which Shlombey PROUDLY
created a thread to advertise.

I looked at it because strangely I had suddenly remembered a travel writer
who had contacted my newspaper and arranged a meeting with me.
I thought he was a little weird... but try to imagine my shock when I
looked at his web site which showed a picture of presumably him or some guy
running along Ocean Beach in SF -- sans clothes.

I was so appalled at how low this guy had sunk over some years.

I quickly immersed myself in religious sites to get the bad energy out of my eyes.

That guy had come from a respectable family, too.

What about those who didn't - how low may some of them sink as the years go by ???

[~Gangster~]

Lmao Yeh no pantless guySsS

On the other hand............

[ScimitarXEdge]

You may call my mentality a "Taliban" one for disagreeing with lewdness and depravity but in reality the real reference you are making is to the Islamic mentality wherein this form of "tolerance" should never be accepted ever. So what you are actually insulting and labeling intolerant is Islam.

The point is these very people whose tolerance you encourage and admire are the very ones who are sent their military forces to fight in far-off lands claiming to want to liberate women from having to cover ? Moreover, in the States, I can say for certain that a woman observing the hijab is not regarded as equal to her uncovered, lewd counterparts and treated in a drastically different manner.

What sort of tolerance is that? If these so-called tolerant beings truly believed in allowing for the freedom to live as people wish, they would not be militarily enforcing their perverted modes of living on people whose modes and ideals differ.

It's time we stopped letting people exploit and distort these words like Freedom and Tolerance

We need to reclaim these words and call things for what they really are. This is a form of corruption and Corruption oppresses people by enabling dysfunctionality in society.

These people are not tolerant or free, they're brainwashed and lost their self respect; it's time people call a Donkey a Donkey instead of letting the Donkey wear silk robes and portray itself under Noble phrases and terms such as Freedom. No way can such things ever be freedom.

[ScimitarXEdge]

let me just say... i agree that this is disgusting.. but not only because the women are dressed in panties... but also then men are too! akh.. no one wants to see his junk
It is as awkward (or maybe even more awkward) for a women to get off a train and see a man with out pants on as much as it is for a man to get off a train and see a woman with out pants on
& i know those of you who have mentioned gender are men... so obviously you would talk about not wanting to see a woman with out pants on but i'm just saying we don't want to see pantless guys walking around as much as you don't want to see pantless girls walking around.

Some of you here are saying "let them do what ever they want"... well we did not say that we are going to force them to wear pants... we are just saying that we believe it is morally incorrect, it's disgusting, we don't want to see that, and we believe that no one should be promoting such a thing.
(well i am at least speaking for myself.)

Actually I am saying this; this is public lewdness and these people should be sent to a Mental Institution or Prison. They can walk around pantless in the privacy of their own Mental Ward or Prison Cell.


There are children who have to go on these trains; these shameless disgraceful people have no regards

what shall we do then ....hide our kids from the world so these dysfunctional individuals act out the warped mentality their society has oppressed them with?

[Manzareh]

were im from 'pants' means 'underwear'

[Gulalai]

Actually I am saying this; this is public lewdness and these people should be sent to a Mental Institution or Prison. They can walk around pantless in the privacy of their own Mental Ward or Prison Cell.


There are children who have to go on these trains; these shameless disgraceful people have no regards

what shall we do then ....hide our kids from the world so these dysfunctional individuals act out the warped mentality their society has oppressed them with?

Well that's also nice way to put it.

ahh Good point! i didn't even think of the children! Touba