oh i know what hypcrite the shiahs are
how is it that your khomaini can use a hadiath from your own books to prove his ''wilaya faqih'' but when it comes to defending abubaker he ignores the same hadith as if it never even existed
how is it that your khomaini can use a hadiath from your own books to prove his ''wilaya faqih'' but when it comes to defending abubaker he ignores the same hadith as if it never even existed
