.... cont ....
As for my remark about military PR. The military have their own PR who meet with the media to put out complete distortians of what they do. This would not unique to the Pakistan army, but since you yourself single them out, I believe that my comment has some validity. It appears that you are trying your best to promote them. It's unecessary, but that's my own personal opinon.
Check your second link. The first takes me to a comment by BLS.
What bothers you more?
That BLS called the non-Pashto speakers Pathans (who claim Pashtoon ancestry, but who are viewed rather seperately) or that these Pathans were, in effect, in servitude to the colonial masters?
And no, we should revert to name calling, but that in itself is indicative of our racial and religious politics.
As for my remark about military PR. The military have their own PR who meet with the media to put out complete distortians of what they do. This would not unique to the Pakistan army, but since you yourself single them out, I believe that my comment has some validity. It appears that you are trying your best to promote them. It's unecessary, but that's my own personal opinon.
Check your second link. The first takes me to a comment by BLS.
What bothers you more?
That BLS called the non-Pashto speakers Pathans (who claim Pashtoon ancestry, but who are viewed rather seperately) or that these Pathans were, in effect, in servitude to the colonial masters?
And no, we should revert to name calling, but that in itself is indicative of our racial and religious politics.

