Hazaras 50% Pashtun 50% Mongol/Turk DNA

[Forreigner]

I believe this to be the case. How else they end up in the middle/center of Afghanistan bordering Pashtun lands to the southeast?



it also doesn't make any sense that even Uzbeks and Turkmen surrounding Hazaras in the north are less Mongoloid than Hazaras?

Uzbeks:





Uzbekistan has a sizeable Tajik population, some of these may actually be Tajik rather than Uzbek, but my point still stands.

Turkmen:






Hazara with the fierce aura of a Pashtun warrior:



look at that beard. Pure Mongols can't make such beards.

I strongly believe Hazaras are the result of Mongol Pathan mixing in central Afghanistan...Hazaras = 50% Pathan 50% Mongol DNA (likely rape, as Chengiz Chan was big on the rape, and also many Pashtuns also adopted Khan last name, specially Indians with Pathan ancestry such Shah Rukh Khan, Salman Khan, Saif Ali Khan, etc.)

[Iblis_Efreetzai]

Do something to productive with your life. You have more racial complex than White Nationalist Stormfront members. GTFO.

[Aryana]

The only people the Mongols raped in the region are Tajiks.

[khushal]

Khan is a Turk word not a Mongol word. In South Asia the title "Khan Sahib" was originally conferred by the Mughuls on Muslim subjects in recognition of public services rendered and was adopted by the East India company for the same purpose.

[DaZahroJaam.]

You believe?? What are you, Stephen hawking or Charles Darwin?? You believe something that has to do with DNA and your evidence for it is the way people seem to appear?? That is the most ignorant thing I have come across this week.