Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Habashi Dynasty of Bengal

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • #1

    Habashi Dynasty of Bengal

    Contrary to popular Bengali Folklore, it seems that many Bengalis/Bangladeshis who try to claim Persian, Arab or Afghan descent may in fact be mistaking this for their true heirtage of being of Habashi (Ethiopian) Ancestry.






    African Elites in India: Habshi Amarat - Google Books
    The Great Ethiopian Dynasty Of Bengal - Talk of the Day - Ligali Forums
    African Males, known for their insatiable appetites; probably made a very rapid campaign of genetic incursion with Bengali women; which would explain the current generation of Bangladeshis who claim to be Sayyids or Pashtuns and other foreign origin and provide a true basis for their foreign links

    This makes obvious sense since Pashtun men of the Sur Dynasty would most likely not be Physically Attracted to the average Bangladeshi Lady.




    Saifuddin Firuz Shah (reigned: 1487–1489) was the second ruler of the Habshi dynasty of Bengal. His original name is Malik Indil, who is also a descendant of Abyssinian or Habesha people

    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
    don’t try to be smart.
    Tags: None
  • #2
    [MENTION=18842]Samandri[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=17351]Friends of Baloch[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=19569]Hunter[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=19453]Win Butler[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=1547]khushal[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=1772]BarakzaiAbdali[/MENTION]
    [MENTION=1753]Manzareh[/MENTION] [MENTION=18674]Insight[/MENTION] [MENTION=19424]Firdousi[/MENTION] [MENTION=18717]sterge[/MENTION] [MENTION=19541]Myanthropologies[/MENTION]

    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
    don’t try to be smart.

    Comment

    • #3
      This is a major L for Bengal Tiger. He sought to portray himself as superior to Habesha people yet they ruled his ancestors as well.

      Comment

      • #4
        Originally posted by Win Butler View Post
        This is a major L for Bengal Tiger. He sought to portray himself as superior to Habesha people yet they ruled his ancestors as well.

        Haha you got it, he's trying to redeem himself but it ends up backfiring terribly.

        Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


        Originally posted by ذو الفقار
        don’t try to be smart.

        Comment

        • #5
          Ahbaash are a very noble race of people. I have only met the nicest people from East Africa. Can't imagine tandulkar being from habashi heritage. He is no way like them.
          Originally posted by Firdousi
          Never talk with Afghans about politics. All their political knowledge is limited to conspiracy theories, political demonization and contradictions. No logic, no reason.

          Comment

          • #6
            There's no real such thing as a bad race, even when I mention white inperiaism it's not a condemnation of white Europeans but a political doctrine. It's only in the minds of those suffering an inferiority complex that being a certain race bears shame. Which is why making this thread is important it either reveals people's complexes or it breaks them

            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
            don’t try to be smart.

            Comment

            • #7
              I did know that Habshis or Ethopians have ruled Bengal but you have made very interesting and correct observation.....Bengalis , on various forums, are silent about their Habshi kings while loudly talking about their Turk, Arab and Afghan heritage, insisting that majority of them are descendants of these races (skipping habshis). Thats shameful attitude by Bengalis, indicating their inferiority complex about their skin colour. While habshis were black, they were very tall folk with good physique....but in the gene pool of midget bengalis, recessive trait of tallness was not much of help. Habshis were particularly prominent in Deccan sultanates and produced many able administrators like Malik Ambar and Ikhlas Khan. Habshis and Afghans were considered to be most able and energetic factions in power structure of Deccan while native Deccanis were considered degenerates. Bengalis cant hold candles to Habshis in achievements in medieval india.

              Comment

              • #8
                Ethiopians ruled Gujarat, Sindh and central parts of India, I dont think there was a rule in Bengal, not sure. But anyways, I would personally rather be african, then central asian, I actually wish that central asians never ruled India

                Comment

                • #9
                  Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                  Ethiopians ruled Gujarat, Sindh and central parts of India, I dont think there was a rule in Bengal, not sure. But anyways, I would personally rather be african, then central asian, I actually wish that central asians never ruled India
                  Ethopians never ruled Sindh, Gujarat or central india. Bengal's is their only sizable dynasty (they had also very small chiefdoms on indian coast but those were under suzarainty of Deccan sultanates). The Africans that you see in Karachi, are descendants of slaves of Balochs (who gave them freedom on the onset of great drought in Balochistan in 18th century)

                  Moron, its because of central asians, that you have term "indo-muslim civilization" to boast about. Also your Dalit ancestors were converted to Islam by saints and rulers from central asia. Be sensible, you wannabe Tarek Fateh
                  Last edited by Samandri; 08-21-2016, 08:25 PM.

                  Comment

                  • #10
                    Originally posted by samandri View Post
                    be sensible, you wannabe tarek fateh
                    lol. But Lala he's an apostate now......by his own declaration.

                    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                    don’t try to be smart.

                    Comment

                    • #11
                      Originally posted by Samandri View Post
                      Ethopians never ruled Sindh, Gujarat or central india. Bengal's is their only sizable dynasty (they had also very small chiefdoms on indian coast but those were under suzarainty of Deccan sultanates). The Africans that you see in Karachi, are descendants of slaves of Balochs (who gave them freedom on the onset of great drought in Balochistan in 18th century)

                      Moron, its because of central asians, that you have term "indo-muslim civilization" to boast about. Also your Dalit ancestors were converted to Islam by saints and rulers from central asia. Be sensible, you wannabe Tarek Fateh

                      There is nothing to boost about that civilization, all the central asian rulers were bacha baaz and killed millions of non muslims, why should I celebrate such things? If I celebrate that, then I would have to celebrate ISIS as well, their doing exactly the same thing what muslims did in the past.

                      Also no, Islam came to India even before Afghanistan dumb idiot, it was brought by Arabs and the first mosque was built in Kerala

                      Comment

                      • #12
                        Originally posted by Karachi View Post
                        There is nothing to boost about that civilization, all the central asian rulers were bacha baaz and killed millions of non muslims, why should I celebrate such things? If I celebrate that, then I would have to celebrate ISIS as well, their doing exactly the same thing what muslims did in the past.

                        Also no, Islam came to India even before Afghanistan dumb idiot, it was brought by Arabs and the first mosque was built in Kerala
                        lol Tarek Fateh ki najaiz ulaad, for years you were wannabe central asian on anthroboards.

                        Comment

                        • #13
                          Originally posted by versatile View Post
                          lol Tarek Fateh ki najaiz ulaad, for years you were wannabe central asian on anthroboards.

                          I never wanted to be central asian, yuck

                          even on those forums I was always interested in ASI, the original Indians related to Andmanese Islanders, just like I am here.

                          Comment

                          • #14
                            I do recall a post where you claimed "Pathan" ancestry. I'll have to find it.

                            Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


                            Originally posted by ذو الفقار
                            don’t try to be smart.

                            Comment

                            Previous template Next
                            Working...
                            X