Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Gandharis were Pactyans?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #91
    Originally posted by Samandri View Post
    By Indian civilization you mean this ?







    Hindu culture looks primitive, I dont know why these gandu Indians are gloating so much on this thread like they are some advanced culture lol

    This is Indian culture in its purest form.

    Also this:



    Some advanced culture...lmao

    Comment


    • #92
      Originally posted by miniskit View Post
      Are we really discussing this stupid theory? Afghans are east iranics, go look how these people have been described historically to know if they can be responsible for any civilisation. Forget about a second Gandhara is indic as it gets. Afghans are like mongols and turks, good at adopting other people culture but poor at coming up with their own or influencing others. Afghans life style was also same as mongols and turk, nomads. Correct me if I am wrong but 60% of Afghans still live like in ancient times, nomadic people with goats.

      Only two civilisations exist in this region, Indian and persian.
      Lol some "civilized":









      Comment


      • #93
        They are all dalits, their life style is similar to nomadic afghans and not like rajputs. I have nothing against Afghans but stop claiming our civilisation Gandhara.

        Comment


        • #94
          Originally posted by miniskit View Post
          They are all dalits, their life style is similar to nomadic afghans and not like rajputs. I have nothing against Afghans but stop claiming our civilisation Gandhara.
          Whats the difference between Dalit and rest of Indians? This is Hindu culture in purest form.

          Gandharans werent even Hindu. They were a Buddhist culture and racially different from dark skinned Indians.

          Comment


          • #95
            Originally posted by miniskit View Post
            They are all dalits, .
            Here is your Brahman Aryan


            Comment


            • #96
              Originally posted by Jinnah View Post
              Lol some "civilized":

              Poor pony......instead of riding horses like Central Asian warriors and using it for warring, Brahmans and other Hindus were interested in the holes of horses

              Comment


              • #97
                Originally posted by miniskit View Post
                They are all dalits, their life style is similar to nomadic afghans and not like rajputs. I have nothing against Afghans but stop claiming our civilisation Gandhara.

                Nomadic Afghans have more honor than all of Indians combined.

                You just can't compare those 'somethings' with Kochi!!

                Comment


                • #98
                  Originally posted by Samandri View Post
                  Here is your Brahman Aryan


                  [IMG]httpsQ/1.jpg[/IMG]
                  Sadhus are not brahmins.

                  Comment


                  • #99
                    Originally posted by Indian boss
                    First you denied any hindu genocide has taken place in Peshawar and jalalabad valley during Mahmud ghazni' s conquest then I proved you wrong and now You are digging old graves of hepathelites and pactayns.
                    lol... dumbass. You pasted a link to a book, and referred me to page 24. You obviously didn't read page 24 yourself, because had you read it you would've noticed that page 24 was talking about Hepthalites, NOT Mahmud of Ghazni. I can't make it simpler... you should pay attention to your "evidence" next time.

                    I gave you location of where these afghans were during medieval time through Alberuni(a local).Al Bruni (Iranian) never gives your(afghan) ancestors location anywhere close to jalalabad valley forget about Peshawar valley.Denying al Bruni's reference the last great Iranian historian from Afghanistan itself is a proof of your ignorance and he lived most part of his life in Afghanistan.Al Bruni mentions of how hindu civilisation declined in Northwest India and hindus were forced to retreat to indian inner lands from frontier

                    Now Pakthas or pactayns
                    You digged these old people's grave just to prove yourself wrong.Pakhtas were mentioned in Rig-Veda as indic tribe living south of kruma(khuram valley) not in Gandhara.And Greek historian Herodotus too mentions pactayns as living in south of Arachosia (southeastern AFGHANISTAN) not in Gandhara or jalalabad valley.Still modern historians don't approve that ancient pactayns are modern day pashtuns . Except similar sounding name there is no commonality between these two tribes . Pactayns were an indic tribe and pashtuns are Iranian.LOL
                    Map of Persian empire in 500bc see where pactayns were and where Gandhara was.http://www.pashtunforums.com/attachm...1&d=1500537002
                    Million dollar question:are pashtuns Indian or Iranian race?
                    Are pashtuns pactayns ,an Indian tribe, mentioned in rig Veda as living in kruma and Herodotus living south of Arachosia(southeastern AFGHANISTAN )
                    OR
                    Are pashtuns afghans,an Iranian tribe,metioned by al Bruni living in Suleiman range during 11th century.
                    If pashtun or afghans consider themselves indian race I don't have any problem but conflict of interests arises when pashtun consider themselves as Iranian race but steal the history of indian race.
                    Yet I provided a source, and you just showed me some map (of which there are numerous variations). lol... what a low rank, low caste, sub-par, inferior you are. Go away, don't touch me. I don't want your dravidian soul in contact with my high ranking superior soul. lol.
                    Last edited by Elite Pakhtun; 07-21-2017, 12:56 AM.

                    Comment


                    • Originally posted by miniskit View Post
                      Low caste people are not part of hindu dharma and neither responsible for Indian civilisation which is product of Rajput Kshatriya and brahmins.
                      Originally posted by miniskit View Post
                      They are all dalits, their life style is similar to nomadic afghans and not like rajputs.


                      You obviously are in denial about your own people and like a typical subcontinental suffer from massive self-loathing and racial inferiority complex.

                      Caste system is all BS socially constructed nonsense. Dalits and Rajputs and whatever other stinkers you have in India are all the same Dravidian race and share the same blood and ancestors.

                      Nobody outside of your 'culture' cares about the nonsensical Hinduness you divide yourselves up into. All of us just see you for what you are, Indians/Hindus/Pakis, because that is all that you stinkers are. No difference for us between a Brahman and a Dalit, they are all the same crappy thing,
                      Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
                      sigpic
                      Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post


                        You obviously are in denial about your own people and like a typical subcontinental suffer from massive self-loathing and racial inferiority complex.

                        Caste system is all BS socially constructed nonsense. Dalits and Rajputs and whatever other stinkers you have in India are all the same Dravidian race and share the same blood and ancestors.

                        Nobody outside of your 'culture' cares about the nonsensical Hinduness you divide yourselves up into. All of us just see you for what you are, Indians/Hindus/Pakis, because that is all that you stinkers are. No difference for us between a Brahman and a Dalit, they are all the same crappy thing,
                        I feel for your oppressed people. But said this of course there is difference between rajputs and dalits. Ask invaders who used to get beaten like donkeys even by divided rajputs. British found them most honourable race in all of Asia.

                        Dalits are distinct people with lifestyle similar to nomadic people and not royal rajputs.

                        Comment


                        • Originally posted by salman47 View Post



                          Nomadic Afghans have more honor than all of Indians combined.

                          You just can't compare those 'somethings' with Kochi!!
                          Honourable and nomadic? lol

                          Comment


                          • Originally posted by miniskit View Post
                            I feel for your oppressed people. But said this of course there is difference between rajputs and dalits. Ask invaders who used to get beaten like donkeys even by divided rajputs. British found them most honourable race in all of Asia.

                            Dalits are distinct people with lifestyle similar to nomadic people and not royal rajputs.
                            There is no difference between Rajputs and Dalits. Both are Indians, both have Dravidian ancestors, both have the same culture, both speak the same languages, both belong to the same Hindu society, both look, act and smell exactly the same.

                            Usually it is Punjabis who expose themselves as the biggest self-loathing Dravidians of all the Indics, but you match even your Paki brothers in the depths of Indic inferiority complex, making up false history and insulting your own people.
                            Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!
                            sigpic
                            Long Live Baloch Freedom Struggle Until Victory!

                            Comment


                            • Gandaharis were more similar to Pakhtuns despite being Indic.

                              Comment


                              • Originally posted by Friends of Baloch View Post
                                There is no difference between Rajputs and Dalits. Both are Indians, both have Dravidian ancestors, both have the same culture, both speak the same languages, both belong to the same Hindu society, both look, act and smell exactly the same.

                                Usually it is Punjabis who expose themselves as the biggest self-loathing Dravidians of all the Indics, but you match even your Paki brothers in the depths of Indic inferiority complex, making up false history and insulting your own people.
                                I don't have complex. Dalits are Indians like us but rajputs and them are not same. Dil ko behlane ko yeh heyal acha hai. People hate rajputs because they beat afghans like donkeys. They slaughtered arabs and turks despite being divided.

                                Hindu Rajputs ruled Kabul for thousand years...

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X