The Hindkis of Pakhtunkhwa and Afghanistan

[Kakar-Wardak]

These Kakars are not that good looking but majority of Pathans are extremely good looking. Look up Pathan chai wala from Pakistan and Chai wala from India. Huge difference

This dalkhoor is posting pics of politicians, yet a regular pashtun would be a bollywood star in their country, when they try to show you their own people they will post actors, models and other celebrities.

[Charsi Malang]

This dalkhoor is posting pics of politicians, yet a regular pashtun would be a bollywood star in their country, when they try to show you their own people they will post actors, models and other celebrities.

Very true. Funny you should mention that because a lot of Bollywood stars do actually claim Pashtun ancestry.

[Charsi Malang]

my Dravidian friend, i knows several Hindu and Sikhs who came from Afghanistan. They said there ancesters was living in afghanistan more than 350 years ago.

There were defiantly Hindus living in Kabul around the time of the first Anglo Afghan war. Read some of the accounts of the campaign and you will see. What difference does it make?

[Friends of Baloch]

There were defiantly Hindus living in Kabul around the time of the first Anglo Afghan war. Read some of the accounts of the campaign and you will see. What difference does it make?

What these smelly pakis are trying to infer is that Hindus in Afghanistan are the original population and that Afghanistan is originally 'Indian'. The fact however is that Hindus in Kabul and some of the other trade hubs have always been back and forth migrants from the Indian subcontinent.

In some minor times in history Hindu immigrants may have contributed to the economy of Kabul but culturally and politically Hindus and other Indians are irrelevant to the history of Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras, Baloch, Turkmen and Nuristanis, but pakis and Hindu nationalist are always desperate to try and relate themselves to Afghans and place themselves at the center of Afghanistan's history.

They try to see West and Central Asia through the prism of their own historical experience of always having been invaded and conquered by people from there without understanding that while small bands of invaders were invading and slaughtering these pakis in their own Bundjab homeland and across Hindustan, life was going on for the rest of the peoples of West and Central Asia without any connection to those invasions or what was happening in Pakiland-India while they were under the occupation of these small bands of invaders.

Subcontinentals know only what these West and Central Asians did in Pakiland-India (and even then their 'knowledge' is questionable) but have no clue what West and Central Asians were doing in actual West and Central Asia, which is what matters. But farted up pakis and Indians think that what West and Central Asian invader did in the subcontinent is at the centre of the history of those regions too when in fact it is only a footnote for them

[Charsi Malang]

What these smelly pakis are trying to infer is that Hindus in Afghanistan are the original population and that Afghanistan is originally 'Indian'. The fact however is that Hindus in Kabul and some of the other trade hubs have always been back and forth migrants from the Indian subcontinent.

In some minor times in history Hindu immigrants may have contributed to the economy of Kabul but culturally and politically Hindus and other Indians are irrelevant to the history of Pashtuns, Tajiks, Uzbeks, Hazaras, Baloch, Turkmen and Nuristanis, but pakis and Hindu nationalist are always desperate to try and relate themselves to Afghans and place themselves at the center of Afghanistan's history.

They try to see West and Central Asia through the prism of their own historical experience of always having been invaded and conquered by people from there without understanding that while small bands of invaders were invading and slaughtering these pakis in their own Bundjab homeland and across Hindustan, life was going on for the rest of the peoples of West and Central Asia without any connection to those invasions or what was happening in Pakiland-India while they were under the occupation of these small bands of invaders.

Subcontinentals know only what these West and Central Asians did in Pakiland-India (and even then their 'knowledge' is questionable) but have no clue what West and Central Asians were doing in actual West and Central Asia, which is what matters. But farted up pakis and Indians think that what West and Central Asian invader did in the subcontinent is at the centre of the history of those regions too when in fact it is only a footnote for them

I see now.

I've also come across many Desis (includes Bangladeshis, Indians and Pakistanis) who seem to think that all the above mentioned countries, including Afghanistan were one country before the 1947 partition. Somehow I got the impression that this is what they are either taught in school, if they've ever been or that is what their misinformed parents tell them. But I suppose it equates to what you are stating.