Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

An interesting reference about Khaljies (1220 A.D)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • An interesting reference about Khaljies (1220 A.D)

    So there is document of 1220 A.D, fihan-namah, in which the Khilji Turks are still to be found in and around Ghazni , and Zabulistan. The contemporary author Najib bakran is saying that "their language has undergone alterations and has become a different dialect". It might be this "alteration" and "dialect change" is actually Pashtunification,



    @Iblis_Efreetzai @Afghanfootball @Sarbani @Dilawerkhan

  • #2
    Yeah, that explains why Ghalji tribes have many Turkic sounding names.

    like "Kharoti" and "Hotak"

    Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


    Originally posted by ذو الفقار
    don’t try to be smart.

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by Iblis_Efreetzai View Post
      Yeah, that explains why Ghalji tribes have many Turkic sounding names.

      like "Kharoti" and "Hotak"
      And Andar and Taraki

      Comment


      • #4
        [MENTION=18842]History of Pashtuns[/MENTION]

        I've always asked mashran what do these words mean in Pashto, and no one could tell me. One guy told me Kharot comes from Kharat, which he claims means really large lungai, ..... but Kharoti just wear regular lungi like everyone else.. Khudai khabar dai.

        What annoys me is Pashtun habit of making stuff up when they really don't know anything.

        Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


        Originally posted by ذو الفقار
        don’t try to be smart.

        Comment


        • #5
          Do you know what I find funny? That Pashtuns are a conglomerate of Turkic, Iranian and Hindu tribes that speak Pashto while Tajiks are a conglomerate of Iranian tribes who speak Farsi. But for some reason its ok for Pashtuns to call themselves "Pashtun", despite being most of them non-Aryan but its not ok for Tajiks to call themselves "Persian" despite being most of us Aryans.

          Pashtun stupidity at work I guess lol
          "For thirty years, I endured much pain and strife,
          I awaken the Ajam by this Persian [language]. "

          -Ferdowsi.

          Comment


          • #6
            Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
            Do you know what I find funny? That Pashtuns are a conglomerate of Turkic, Iranian and Hindu tribes that speak Pashto while Tajiks are a conglomerate of Iranian tribes who speak Farsi. But for some reason its ok for Pashtuns to call themselves "Pashtun", despite being most of them non-Aryan but its not ok for Tajiks to call themselves "Persian" despite being most of us Aryans.

            Pashtun stupidity at work I guess lol
            Call yourself a Tajik, no one doubts that. Call yourself Persian and there's a problem, Tajik =\= Persian.
            "If a lion comes and takes your share, go get it back from the mouth of the lion"

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Firdousi View Post
              Iranian and Hindu tribes that speak Pashto while Tajiks are a conglomerate of Iranian tribes who speak Farsi.l

              Tajiks also have some Non-Aryan stuff in them too. If the historical record is correct.

              Also, as economist Kaushik Basu says: "For a nation to progress it is important for people to spend time on science, mathematics and literature instead of spending time showing that 5,000 years ago their ancestors did science, mathematics and literature."


              Originally posted by ذو الفقار
              don’t try to be smart.

              Comment

              Working...
              X