Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

The 1930 Civil Disobedience Movement in Peshawar Valley from the Pashtoon Perspective

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • The 1930 Civil Disobedience Movement in Peshawar Valley from the Pashtoon Perspective



    The 1930 Civil Disobedience Movement in Peshawar Valley from the Pashtoon Perspective: Part I

    By Syed Wiqar Ali Shah

    This is the first of a three part series adapted from Syed Wiqar Ali Shah's article "The 1930 Civil Disobedience Movement in Peshawar Valley from the Pashtoon Perspective", published in the journal: Studies in History. The original article can be accessed here.

    In 1930, the Indian National Congress under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi launched its civil disobedience movement against the British Indian government demanding ‘Complete Independence’. Responding to the call of Gandhi, like other parts of India, the North–West Frontier Province’s (N–WFP, renamed as Khyber–Pashtoonkhwa) Congressmen also embarked on the civil disobedience but in view of their small number the local authorities ignored it. To give a boost to their movement, the local Congress leaders requested Abdul Ghaffar Khan, the prominent social worker of the Province, famous for his altruism, to support them in the next round of the intended civil disobedience in Peshawar to which he agreed. The colonial administration had no further tolerance for such activities. They decided not to allow the scheduled activities of the local political workers which might cause disturbance to the peace and tranquility of the province. On the selected day, that is, 23 April 1930, brutal force was used to disperse the demonstrators. The tragic firing on the peaceful mob in the Qissa Khani Bazaar, Peshawar, resulted in the killing of more than two hundred people in one single day and can be ranked at par with the massacre at the Jallianwala Bagh, Amritsar, in April 1919. It was followed by a reign of terror in the whole Frontier Province. The Khudai Khidmatgars and their supporters were subjected to the worst kind of humiliation. After Peshawar, similar atrocities were committed at Takkar, Utmanzai and Bannu. Despite the worst kind of repression by the government, the Pashtoons remained non-violent. Under the circumstances they were compelled to join INC, a friendship which continued till the partition of India in August 1947.

    While lot of research has been done on the civil disobedience movement in other parts of India, the Frontier Province and in particular the Peshawar Valley have been neglected hitherto for unknown reasons. Very little research has been conducted on this particular region. The absence of written record on this area and subject has meant that the social scientists, historians, analysts and other scholars belonging to various disciplines who have special interest in South Asi

  • #2
    Ghaffar was so concerned of massacre of Sikh and Indians, but didn't care about massacre of Shi'a pashtuns at the hands of Afghani king emir abdur Rehman,
    "I bow to no one, except ALLAH. I dont bow to punjabay, do not bow to kabulay and afghanay, do not bow to faujay and mullay, do not bow to asfandyarwalay and petty khanays...i am traitor to all of them." - Smartay

    Comment


    • #3
      Originally posted by tripledouble View Post
      Ghaffar was so concerned of massacre of Sikh and Indians, but didn't care about massacre of Shi'a pashtuns at the hands of Afghani king emir abdur Rehman,
      Amir Abdur Rahman Khan was Amir and did the things he did before Ghaffar Khan become politically active.

      And as a representatives of Islam and Muslims what did the founding fathers of Pakistan do? Did they do something about that? What about the genocide and rape of brothers and sisters in Islam in East Pakistan not to mention the participation in the killing and subjugation of Muslims by the British Empire around the world by playing the role of its imperial mercenaries and tools?

      If you couldn't produce a single leader that fought for freedom and rather did the opposite at least be honest enough to accept the role of others instead of being jealous.
      Last edited by Toramana; 04-24-2015, 03:46 PM.

      Comment


      • #4
        Originally posted by tripledouble View Post
        Ghaffar was so concerned of massacre of Sikh and Indians, but didn't care about massacre of Shi'a pashtuns at the hands of Afghani king emir abdur Rehman,
        Shia Pashtun? Where did you get that from you diiot.

        Ghaffar Khan and Abdur Rahman lived during different times moron and different places.

        you used to be brighter killzai, I think those drugs have messed up your brain.

        Comment

        Working...
        X