Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
One Man Against an Empire - 'Faqir of Ipi' - Waziristan
Collapse
X
-
he wasn't pro establishment. he was giving sanctuary to TTP fighters that were fighting against the Pakistani state. The only reason he did not attack Pakistani troops was they had an agreement they would not enter each others territory.Originally posted by Da Bannu Mazdigar View Postyes,he was pro establishment until the launch of this operation.
He had upto 4k fighters strength
all your statements are weak and contradictory.
Comment
-
Really?Do you even know that Pak army had almost 15k presence in NW ever since 2006 and smaller numbers always.I hope you do know about razmak which is a military garrison.Originally posted by khushal View Posthe wasn't pro establishment. he was giving sanctuary to TTP fighters that were fighting against the Pakistani state. The only reason he did not attack Pakistani troops was they had an agreement they would not enter each others territory.
all your statements are weak and contradictory.
He didnt had any agreement that PA would not enter there area.Hell no such agreement was ever signed with anyone.
Kayani believed in proxy warfare and was COAS for 6 long years,he was the sole reason why operation in NW was not launched after 2008 because he believed in giving sanctuary to haqqani."[B][SIZE="3"]Seer Speen Wazeer[/SIZE][/B]"
Comment
-
kayani knew he could not win, it would be a waste of resources.Originally posted by Da Bannu Mazdigar View PostReally?Do you even know that Pak army had almost 15k presence in NW ever since 2006 and smaller numbers always.I hope you do know about razmak which is a military garrison.
He didnt had any agreement that PA would not enter there area.Hell no such agreement was ever signed with anyone.
Kayani believed in proxy warfare and was COAS for 6 long years,he was the sole reason why operation in NW was not launched after 2008 because he believed in giving sanctuary to haqqani.
so what is this agreement then.
http://www.criticalthreats.org/pakis...y-and-analysis
Like I said your statements are weak and contradictory.The first of these occurred in September 2006, when the Pakistani government, worn out after its two –and-half-year offensive against foreign militants and Taliban fighters in Waziristan, signed a deal with Hafiz Gul Bahadur and Maulvi Saddiq Noor, among other tribal leaders, many of whom had aided and abetted foreign fighters. Many analysts saw the deal as a victory for North Waziristan Taliban leaders, as the region had seen well over a year of fierce fighting.[71] The deal called for the Pakistani military to cease operations in the region, release detained militants, remove checkpoints, and reimburse local Taliban for damages during the operation. In return, the militants agreed to halt attacks on the government, refrain from setting up a parallel government, stop cross-border movement into Afghanistan, and expel foreigners, although the agreement made an exception for foreigners who remained and chose to “live peacefully in line with tribal customs and traditions
Comment

Comment