Tweet
was razia sultana a pashtun?
Nazia Iqbal & Javed Fiza ~~ Sok Gwari Che Shi Milonar - YouTube[/URL]
just listen to 9:09 min
Nazia Iqbal & Javed Fiza ~~ Sok Gwari Che Shi Milonar - YouTube[/URL]
just listen to 9:09 min
-
-
I thought she was turkic(central asian) but who really knows -
Yes history books do say she was Turkic of C Asian origin. But Hindustan was really a melting pot of all races/clans/tribes from C and W Asia. Indigenous Rajput blood also mixed.Comment
-
the tv programm is misleading its viewers by saying razia sultana was a pashtun.Comment
-
she was pashtana.
like some say Ghori was not pashtun,this way they also claim that Sultana was not pashtun.
Iranian claim sayed Jamaludin Al Afghani wasnt Afghan but iranian and they call him Sayed Jamaludin Asadabadi.
Comment
-
Iranians, at times(not all obviously) can be pretty snobby. They act as if all Afghan figures were Iranian, but they fail to realize that aside from being ruled, and conquered by Afghans, they share historical figures due to common language and bondage. Mawlana Rumi Balkhi, for instance, they claim was actually from Iran. Given their polluted way of speaking Farsi vis-a-vis Afghan Farsi, one can tell most of the literature was produced in what is now known as Afghanistan.
Cut it off, and stop the propaganda.Even Adobe Photoshop can't change me.
A line[Durrand line] of hatred that raised a wall between the two brothers -Hamid Karzai
For generations, the Hindus of India prayed for deliverance from "the venom of the cobra, the teeth of the tiger and the vengeance of the Afghan."
The men of Kábul and Khilj also went home; and whenever they were questioned about the Musulmáns of the Kohistán (the mountains), and how matters stood there, they said, "Don't call it Kohistán, but Afghánistán; for there is nothing there but Afgháns and disturbances." Thus it is clear that for this reason the people of the country call their home in their own language Afghánistán, and themselves Afgháns. The people of India call them Patán; but the reason for this is not known. But it occurs to me, that when, under the rule of Muhammadan sovereigns, Musulmáns first came to the city of Patná, and dwelt there, the people of India (for that reason) called them Patáns—but God knows!
-Ferishta, 1560–1620Comment
-
but we are not iranian to claim some one being a pashtun, he or she is not.Originally posted by بریدمل View Post
pashtun has been documented warriors in the history of Hind but not slaves.
Rulers of the Slave Dynasty (1206 - 1290)
- Qutb-ud-din Aybak (1206 - 1210)
- Aram Shah (1210 - 1211)
- Altamas(Shams ud din Iltutmish) (1211 - 1236)
- Rukn ud din Firuz (1236)
- Razia Sultan (Raziyyat ud din Sultana) (1236 - 1240)
- Muiz ud din Bahram (1240 - 1242)
- Ala ud din Masud (1242 - 1246)
- Nasir ud din Mahmud (1246 - 1266)
- Ghiyas ud din Balban (1266 - 1286)
- Muiz ud din Qaiqabad (1286 - 1290)
- Kayumars (1290)
Comment
Comment