If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Agreed with everything in this post (excellent post by the way), especially the irrelevance of the Pashtun POV. I started this thread out of curiousity, as a comparison between the Pashtun vis-à-vis the Indian mentality. Indians have in the past argued that India was the proto-Indo-European urheimat. This is not uncommon with other modern Indo-European speaking ethnic groups, that they argue a geographic poition based on their own ethnic background.
Of course, although the Out-of-India camp usually campaign for the "indigenousness" of the Aryans rather than Proto-Indo-European itself.
If a pro-Indian PIE perspective exists, it will be thoroughly contrived and unscientific given the lack of anything distinctly Indo-European which isn't Indo-Iranian before 1000 B.C.
For sure it is somwhere arround the Caspian sea, if You lok with that almost all theories agree.
I Think genetically it seems in an aspect that Armenian highland, Anatolia or Western Iran will fit well, in the sense of Y chromosome haplogroups.
Ա՜խ, ընկել եմ քար ու քարափ,
Իմ սրբություն, ե՛տ արի, ե՛տ, Ես ծովակ եմ առանց կարապ,
Իմ էություն, ե՛տ արի, ե՛տ: Ես անտառ եմ առանց եղնիկ
Իմ վեհություն, ե՛տ արի, ե՛տ:
Comment